Channel
@UnvaccinatedMedia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,046subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001732022906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnvaccinatedMedia |
| Created | 10 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnvaccinatedMedia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 2,046 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 2,047 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 2,050 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,051 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,051 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📰 BREAKING NEWS: Trump Claims “I Will Bomb Israel” in Heated Exchange! 🇺🇸🇮🇱 President Trump reportedly stated he would be the first US President to order the bombing of Israel during a tense conversation with Netanyahu. According to Brics News! … Is this a major diplomatic meltdown or exaggerated rhetoric? Share your view. https://t.me/FreePalestineFreedom 🇵🇸
😱2
https://rumble.com/v71iigu-the-future-is-now.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a
💥 💥 BREAKING‼️ Telegram announced that Apple will remove the Telegram app from their phones without their joint notice. Telegram announced that to prevent this, apply the mentioned settings 👆👆👆 Note: 📝 There’s a step between 3 and 4. Tap on ‘iTunes’ and ‘App Store Purchases’ Keep always informed: 🗽Subscribe @UnvaccinatedNY 🍎Join @UnvaccinatedNewYork 🚫💉MAIN group @Unvaccinate
🚫UNVACCINATED🚫
🚫UNVACCINATED🚫
❤2🔥1🤯1
THE WEST HAS A TREASON PROBLEM - WEF database information More info extracted from the WEF. - The Global Surveillance & Control Network: The Nexus of CBDCs, Health Passes, and Behavioral Enforcement Introduction: The Architecture of Global Control The Global Surveillance & Control Network is no longer science fiction. It is a sprawling, interconnected system powered by AI, surveillance infrastructure, centralized …
We stand at a crossroads. The same technologies that can deliver convenience and safety can also be used to suppress, censor, and control. As CBDCs roll out and digital ID systems expand, the public must demand open standards, opt-out mechanisms, and constitutional protections. Once surveillance, money, and identity are merged—there may be no going back. - Title: The Rise of Digital Surveillance: A 20-Year Timeline…
Municipalities began implementing systems where access to public transit, venues, or financial services was linked to behavior scores. Digital wallets with integrated health and civic data became the norm. 14. 2028 – Global Score Federation Countries entered agreements to recognize each other's digital trust scores. Cross-border travel, employment, and commerce became conditional on a federated reputation system. …
❤2🤯1
JUST IN - Gold tops $3,490 for the first time. You need more Ponzischeme-USD to cover one ounce of gold🏅. Meaning that the USD is rapidly loosing purchasing power. Gold is real money, everything else is credit. @GoldenDinarDirham ✨
🤡3
https://gofund.me/30819cb9
🤡1
Please help if you can ❤️🙏🏽
🤡1
https://paypal.me/likemoon70k?country.x=IL&locale.x=en_US
🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @UnvaccinatedMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 774,208 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNVACCINATED MEDIA” (@UnvaccinatedMedia), 2,046 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnvaccinatedMedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.