Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OGCommunity | Academy

@OGCommunity_Academy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

109,990subscribers

-881 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002165940393
TypeChannel
Username@OGCommunity_Academy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OGCommunity_Academy

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@OGCommunity_Academy/146 · this entry13 Oct 2025, 16:30 UTC@OGCommunity_ProfitHunters/136813 Oct 2025, 16:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@OGCommunity_ProfitHunters/136914 Oct 2025, 13:57 UTC@OGCommunity_Academy/147 · this entry14 Oct 2025, 13:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@OGC_Announcements_Hub/83314 Oct 2025, 13:56 UTC@OGCommunity_Academy/147 · this entry14 Oct 2025, 13:57 UTC1.0072 seconds
@OGC_Announcements_Hub/83113 Oct 2025, 16:23 UTC@OGCommunity_Academy/146 · this entry13 Oct 2025, 16:30 UTC0.968 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@OGCommunity_ProfitHunters5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@OGCommunity_ProfitHunters (41)
@OGC_Announcements_Hub6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.993.1 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 March 2025 to 20 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @OGCommunity_Academy — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

109,990110,871110,430.56 August 2026 — 110,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 110,871 subscribers7 August 2026 — 110,749 subscribers7 August 2026 — 110,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110,509 subscribers10 August 2026 — 110,358 subscribers10 August 2026 — 110,242 subscribers11 August 2026 — 110,116 subscribers12 August 2026 — 109,990 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -881. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,858–111,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:55109,990-126
11 Aug 2026, 21:33110,116-126
10 Aug 2026, 21:56110,242-116
10 Aug 2026, 01:06110,358-151
9 Aug 2026, 00:53110,509-124
7 Aug 2026, 22:05110,633-116
7 Aug 2026, 00:33110,749-122
6 Aug 2026, 01:32110,871no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:55110,871first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4752.8%
👍2123.6%
🔥1415.7%
22.25%
👏22.25%
🤔22.25%
👎11.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2025 to 20 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Nov 2025, 14:33 UTC≈1,050 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📶 eSIM + Crypto Travelers don’t need local SIM cards anymore, they buy and activate eSIMs directly with crypto, in seconds, from anywhere in the world. Platforms like EncryptSIM, Bitrefill, and WiFi Map turn stablecoins, or even $WIFI into instant mobile data and global internet access. This is where Web3 utility gets real: privacy, global coverage, and no KYC friction — all from your wallet 📘 Full breakdown of th

6🔥2

13 Nov 2025, 06:10 UTC≈17,800 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💸 Crypto QR: The Next Step in Payments Across Asia, QR codes already replaced cash and cards, but now they’re going on-chain. Crypto QR payments let anyone pay or get paid instantly with stablecoins, skipping bank transfers and high fees entirely. It’s fast, borderless, and built for the real world: from cafés to freelancers to cross-border trade. This upgrade is already happening. Are you using it already? 📘 Read

3👍2

2 Nov 2025, 03:20 UTC≈1,080 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✈️ Booking 3.0: Travel Meets Web3 Сrypto is transforming how we book flights and hotels Platforms like Travala, LockTrip, and CryptoRefills now offer instant payments, tokenized rewards, and prices up to 60% lower than traditional sites. From Lightning-powered BTC bookings to NFT travel vouchers, crypto travel is already here and it's faster, cheaper, and borderless 📘 Read the full breakdown on our blog 🐝 App |

🔥21

28 Oct 2025, 15:05 UTC≈19,000 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📊 Perp-DEX: The New Era of On-Chain Trading Perpetual futures have gone fully decentralized — and the numbers prove it. In September 2025, on-chain perp trading hit $1.05 trillion, setting a new record for DeFi. Projects like Aster, Lighter, and Hyperliquid are reshaping how leverage, liquidity, and transparency work in crypto. From Solana to Tron, every chain now has its own contender and the race for dominance ha

3🔥2

26 Oct 2025, 09:26 UTC≈7,750 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📡 DePIN: Real-World Actions, On-Chain Rewards The new wave of DePIN projects connects physical infrastructure with blockchain, rewarding people for real-world utility. It works from charging your phone to driving your car, now every action can earn crypto. In 2025, this sector is booming, learn in the article how to turn everyday behavior into income 👇🏻 📘 DePIN: When Real-World Activity Meets On-Chain Rewards 🐝

2🔥1

14 Oct 2025, 13:57 UTC≈1,010 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$OGC: powering the next phase of OGCommunity It connects everything — from user rewards and staking to DAO and governance. $OGC is the heartbeat of our ecosystem — driving growth, progress, and community power. 🐝 Complete tasks in the OGC App to earn points — they’ll be converted into $OGC during the next token distribution. (soon!) What can you do with $OGC? Stake it. Earn up to +65% extra tokens by locking them

6

13 Oct 2025, 16:30 UTC979 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

OGCommunity is ready to move forward 🔥 We weathered the storm – and now we’re ready to climb higher than ever. The first thing to move? The $OGC token. Every OG has a chance to join the start of this wave. 📈 We’re live on MEXC – How to buy $OGC – What the token is for We’re already working on new projects inside the OGC App, and your support means everything. Spread the word, bring your friends, and let’s reshape

5🔥1

17 Jun 2025, 10:56 UTC≈1,750 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OGC_Announcements_HubPhoto

🚀 Virtuals– The Ultimate AI Agent Launchpad Revolutionizing Web3! Powering the Agent Economy with \$VIRTUAL 🌟 Why Everyone’s Buzzing About Virtuals Protocol 🔹 Stake. Trade. Talk. Earn Points. Earn Virgen Points by staking \$VIRTUAL,$VADER and other AI agents, trading, or tweeting about Virtuals. ➡️ More action = more points = bigger rewards. 🔓 Unlock Priority Launch Access Lock \$VIRTUAL on Virtuals for up to 2

2

12 May 2025, 17:04 UTC≈1,710 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OGCommunity_ProfitHuntersPhoto

➡️ BitcoinOS: Unlocking Bitcoin’s True Potential! ⬅️ Why BitcoinOS? BitcoinOS transforms Bitcoin into a universal settlement layer, enabling it to support smart contracts, cross-chain functionality, and dApps—all while maintaining Bitcoin’s legendary security and decentralization. 🔗 Groundbreaking Innovations: ✅ Zero-Knowledge Proof on Mainnet: Real, production-ready tech deployed on Bitcoin ✅ Bridgeless Cross-Cha

👍6🔥31

6 May 2025, 09:44 UTC≈1,230 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @OGC_Announcements_HubPhoto

🔊 X Space Alert: Boss Fighters – Countdown to TGE 🔊 BOSS FIGHTERS is a fast-growing, cross-platform multiplayer action game that fuses Web2 accessibility with true Web3 ownership. One of the top games on Open Loot — the leading GameFi marketplace today, developed by Big Time. 📅 Date: Tuesday, May 6 ⌛ Time: 14:00 UTC 📌 Place: X Space 🎙 Guest Speakers: • Vadym – CEO & Co-Founder at BOSS FIGHTERS [ X | Telegram ] ⚡

4👏2

30 Apr 2025, 13:42 UTC≈1,400 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PlayBossFighters_annPhoto

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: $BFTOKEN TGE — May 7, 2025! 🚀 BOSS FIGHTERS is leveling up — and so are you. The token powering one of Web3’s fastest-growing games is about to go live. 🎮💥 Why $BFTOKEN matters: ✅ Real in-game utility ✅ Fair Launch — no VC manipulation ✅ Built into a player-first, play-to-own economy ✅ Award-winning game of 2024 🏆 ✅ PC, VR, and soon — mobile. Millions of players incoming. Ready to join the fight?

👍3🤔21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OGCommunity_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 110,152 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OGCommunity | Profit Hunters
@OGCommunity_ProfitHunters · 160,758
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
A L F Λ
@ALFAprotocol_X · 151,521
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Cyber Dog | $CDOG
@CyberDogMeme · 210,110
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

discord.gg5 posts · 26 October 2025 – 20 November 2025 · example post
ogcom.xyz5 posts · 26 October 2025 – 20 November 2025 · example post
x.com5 posts · 26 October 2025 – 20 November 2025 · example post
www.mexc.comregistrable domain: mexc.com1 post · 13 October 2025 – 13 October 2025 · example post
staking.ogcom.xyzregistrable domain: ogcom.xyz1 post · 14 October 2025 – 14 October 2025 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OGCommunity | Academy” (@OGCommunity_Academy), 109,990 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OGCommunity_Academy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.