https://rumble.com/v7g5rc6-episode-176-hunter-biden-the-fbi-and-the-federal-judges-beyond-scrutiny-w-g.html

Channel
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,430subscribers
-847 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001234401504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarcoPolo501c3 |
| Description | Nonprofit investigative group / marcopolo501c3.org / Founder: @GMZUSA |
| Created | 25 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarcoPolo501c3 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 32,430 | -123 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 32,553 | -51 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 32,604 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 32,624 | -26 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 32,650 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 32,690 | -44 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 32,734 | -40 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 32,774 | -42 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 32,816 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 32,835 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 32,852 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 32,861 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 32,886 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 32,899 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 32,913 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 32,930 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 32,951 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 32,968 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 32,975 | -32 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 33,007 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.3%
- avg views ÷ 32,430 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,960
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (14 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 79,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 09:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈965
- Videos
- ≈139
- Links
- ≈1,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://substack.com/profile/53769075-marco-polo/note/c-349862940 BidenReport.com
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/2103680882666012933
https://substack.com/@marcopolo501c3/note/c-344370091 BidenReport.com
Sticker, posted without a caption
a.co/d/hvjuATy
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/2100420482788925565
https://www.marcopolo.icu/subscribe
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/2099715088630378562
https://substack.com/profile/53769075-marco-polo/note/c-337313163
https://donate.stripe.com/dR628l65hgDN8lq6ox
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/2097855410438840681
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @MarcoPolo501c3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@georgenews · 144,4386 postsPatriotN88
@PatriotN88Channel · 5,2554 posts🐸 🇺🇲 ULTRA Q LIFE ⭐️⭐️⭐️
@QLifeLIQNS17 · 733 postsCODE RED 🚨☘️🇺🇸
@RedPillDealer4833 · 11,6152 postsDown The Rabbit Hole
@DownTheRabbitHole777 · 2921 postG.M. Ziegler
@GMZUSA · 62,3621 postGarrett Ziegler
@GarrettMZiegler · 2711 postPolitical Moonshine
@PoliticalMoonshine · 5,6201 postSpiritual Reality Books
@SpiritualRealityBooks · 11 postThe Justice League
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 27,0341 postThe Patriot Experience
@The_PatriotExperience · 731 postWe The Media
@WeTheMedia · 142,8281 postWhisky Tango Foxtrot
@WhiskeyTangoFxtr0t · 341 postFreedom Truth Justice Patriots -COME SHARE YOUR TRUTH HERE
@freedom_truth_justice · 731 postFukurvax
@fukurmindup · 11 postGIVESENDGO
@givesendgo · 1531 postPatriot Chill Spot
@patriot_chill_spot · 61 postwhats this
@whats_tis · 101 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@georgenews · 144,438#1
@RealGenFlynn · 148,425#2
@gatewaypunditofficial · 110,404#3
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,727#4
@Jack_Posobiec · 116,972#5
@WeTheMedia · 142,828#6
@realx22report · 160,450#7
@ElectionHQ2024 · 69,154#8
@VigilantFox · 120,265#9
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 91,880#10
@ResisttheMainstream · 128,902#11
@SidneyPowell · 126,066#12
@OANNTV · 143,828#13
@dotconnectinganons · 27,575#14
@realjust_human · 30,649#15
@RaheemKassam · 7,762#16
@riseofthenewmedia · 18,079#17
@NoAgendaLara · 26,030#18
@PatrickMByrne · 43,287#19
@PepeDeluxed · 56,634#20
@professor_patriot_official · 13,129#21
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,027#22
@TheWashingtonPundit · 5,875#23
@ThePatriotAU · 14,045#24
@SGTnewsNetwork · 111,081#25
@M_JacksonQ · 70,551#26
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,461#27
@Voltron4444 · 11,566#28
@thepeoplesaudit · 3,254#29
@ElectionFraud20_org · 5,425#30
@KanekoaTheGreat · 116,639#31
@bioclandestine · 138,712#32
@PepeMatter · 146,341#33
@disclosetv · 321,989#34
@real_donaldjtrump · 591,100#35
@CodeMonkeyZ · 125,706#36
@TrumpJr · 355,467#37
@CharlieKirk · 151,701#38
@qthestormrider777 · 154,949#39
@police_frequency · 69,996#40
@ShadowofEzra · 146,732#41
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 27,034#42
@BannonWarRoom · 52,030#43
@JamesOKeefeIII · 166,322#44
@intelslava · 390,258#45
@insiderpaper · 108,525#46
@GeneralMCNews · 144,274#47
@RPPharmacistOfficial · 51,726#48
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 206,835#49
@PoliticalMoonshine · 5,620#50
@patelpatriot · 84,024#51
@MichaelJLindell · 78,848#52
@absolute1776 · 40,769#53
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 22,318#54
@RealEntheos · 31,490#55
@realelectionwizard · 21,366#56
@theprofessorsrecord · 50,604#57
@CognitiveCarbonPublic · 11,322#58
@reBurningBright · 12,460#59
@LizHarrington76 · 22,779#60
@realKariLake · 22,069#61
@LauraAbolichannel · 168,591#62
@Patri0tsareinContr0l · 20,008#63
@RealMarjorieGreene · 57,298#64
@dailyrealtimenews · 19,663#65
@Andy_Ngo · 34,258#66
@jeffdotpro · 24,014#67
@SantaSurfing · 123,811#68
@praying_medic · 97,406#69
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 109,236#70
@rsbnetwork · 103,061#71
@AlinaHabbaPatriot · 4,571#72
@project_veritas · 205,562#73
@vDarknessFalls · 26,474#74
@nyflipbucket · 9,588#75
@OperationOutlaw · 10,144#76
@jordansather · 47,655#77
@DanScavinoFORCE · 90,076#78
@grandoldmemes · 8,547#79
@Makaveli_Memez · 1,467#80
@The_Library_II · 18,895#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PatrickMByrne · 43,287
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
@TracybeanzOfficial · 26,479
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
@DrLynnFynn · 24,286
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
@NoAgendaLara · 26,030
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
@MichaelJLindell · 78,848
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,027
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@jeffdotpro · 24,014
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
@wendyrogersaz · 45,674
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@QtimeNetwork · 29,423
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
@realjust_human · 30,649
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
@ElectionHQ2024 · 69,154
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@InevitableET · 38,480
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@Andy_Ngo · 34,258
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@MarkRLevin · 39,050
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@Josh_Hawley · 26,107
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
@theprofessorsrecord · 50,604
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 91,880
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
@realKariLake · 22,069
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
@RealEntheos · 31,490
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 22,318
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
@LizHarrington76 · 22,779
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@Patri0tsareinContr0l · 20,008
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
@givealltheheart · 21,184
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
@RealMarjorieGreene · 57,298
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marco Polo” (@MarcoPolo501c3), 32,430 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarcoPolo501c3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.