Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SpyGate Down 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇮🇱 🇧🇷 🇫🇷

@SpyGateDown

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,307subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001621633219
TypeChannel
Username@SpyGateDown
DescriptionWe're gonna need more rope. もっとロープが必要になります。 Wir brauchen noch mehr Seil.
Created19 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SpyGateDown

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,3078,3158,3117 August 2026 — 8,315 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,315 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,314 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,307 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,306–8,316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:128,307-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:188,314-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:158,315no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:088,315first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.44%
avg views ÷ 8,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held102 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total37,583
Reactions total2,788
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18,900
Videos
12,200
Links
32,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
2m 15s

Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,788 reactions across 101 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏46716.8%
💯45916.5%
38213.7%
🔥36813.2%
🤬32111.5%
👏1846.60%
😡1675.99%
👍1224.38%
🏆752.69%
😁702.51%
😢391.40%
🤔260.933%
🫡200.717%
👀180.646%
🖕170.61%
140.502%
🤩120.43%
💩70.251%
🤡70.251%
🤯60.215%
4 further kinds70.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,788reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestine

POTUS is perfectly content in our current position. He is utilizing a modern day version of siege tactics. Rather than utilizing ground troops and mass casualties, he neutralized Iran from range, surrounded them, cut off their imports/exports, and is squeezing them economically. So for those saying nothing is happening, or that Trump needs to hurry up, that we need a full-scale invasion, etc., you need to understan

👏2

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmysRoomPhoto

"Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee." — Isaiah 26:3

5

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightVideo

WOW. I did not know this.. you? 🚨 Former Bush spokesperson is receiving immense backlash from Democrats after spilling the beans on Obama “Barack Obama got on the 2008 Indiana primary ballot because Democrats in St. Joseph County submitted FRAUDULENT petition signatures. People, including the county Democratic chair, went to jail over it. He should never have been on that ballot— It was exposed two years later. Wen

🔥4

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC138 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

SCOTUS Wire The Trump administration is urging the Supreme Court to quickly restore President Trump's election integrity executive order and make clear its ruling should also halt Judge Indira Talwani's new nationwide injunction against its proposed USPS mail-ballot rules. Talwani's new injunction came while the Supreme Court was already considering the administration's request to lift her earlier order, which bloc

🙏14

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GretchenGM062616Photo

🚨🚨FBI had 14 informants on Biden corruption but ran secret op to dismiss evidence as disinformation The FBI and U.S. spy agencies received derogatory evidence about Joe Biden from 14 different informants but embarked on a secret operation to tamp down a Ukrainian corruption scandal engulfing his family during the 2020 election by formally designating Attorney General Bill Barr, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, key me

🤬6

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC175 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightPhoto

HOLY SHIT! Remember when the Milwaukee Election Director, Claire Woodall-Vogg Suspiciously Came up with Ten’s of Thousands of Ballots She Got Employees to Fill Out in the 2020 Election? Follow me for a second… • emails were uncovered of Claire on election night joking about “delivering the margin needed” to flip the state from Trump to Biden. In the email exchange, Ryan Chew, from the Election Group said to Clair

🤬171

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC198 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightVideo

Did the Democrats rig the election against the socialist? lol 🚨 Milwaukee Election Chaos: 5 USB STICKS were “missing” Election results due to “Human Error” Francesca Hong (the democratic socialist endorsed by groups including the Democratic Socialists of America narrowly lost the Wisconsin Democratic primary for governor to Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley. She only lost by 3,000 votes, and the affected US

😁252

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC139 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SGTnewsNetworkVideo

WOW! This Wisconsin voter just went BERSERK on the communists trying to get elected "All I know is who I don't support. VIET CONG. F*cking communist piece of sht! No, I don't support the Democrat socialists of America! F*ck them! If you think communism is so good, move to Havana, Pyongyang, Caracas — I'll pay for your f*cking air fare, but you gotta renounce your American citizenship. I'll pay for that too!" 🇺🇸Join👉

🏆15

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC249 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Brandenburg4MIVideo

They are telling us exactly what is happening. If we are unbiased it’s easy to see. The hammer is going to drop. Get mentally prepared. @Brandenburg4Mi

6🙏1

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC219 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @riseofthenewmedia

After 5 rounds of mass firings in the IC, progress continues to be made, but it's not over yet. Patriots may have FUNCTIONAL control of the government at this point, but that doesn't mean the shadow government is completely exposed, powerless, or gone yet. The shadow government just tried to work with our enemies to set up a plot to kill our great President...again. Not the first time. Far from the first time. An

🙏63👏1

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC221 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @riseofthenewmedia

So my show this morning probably gonna end up being about how POWERFUL that Shadow Government was in that first Trump term. How shadow government, particularly out of the IC working with shadow government agents embedded in our US Congress, literally engineered an impeachment of a sitting President for looking into Biden family Ukraine corruption. Ever since Trump came in there in 2017, the shadow government was f

💯8👍6👏1

Signed John Greco

12 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC452 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CognitiveCarbonPublic

(source on X) "Anthropic scientists did something terrifying. they reached inside Claude's neural network and planted a thought. Before Claude could speak, it said: "I notice what appears to be an injected thought… it relates to loudness or shouting." They published a paper called "emergent introspective awareness in large language models," and it is actually terrifying. they wanted to test if AI models have "in

🤔14👀64💯2

Signed John Greco

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @SpyGateDown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 864,012 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 146,542
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SpyGate Down 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇮🇱 🇧🇷 🇫🇷” (@SpyGateDown), 8,307 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpyGateDown.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.