Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Just Human ⭐️⭐️⭐️

@realjust_human

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

31,451subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001560401142
TypeChannel
Username@realjust_human
DescriptionA Human, weathering my intuitions. Husband. Father. Texan. Researcher. Alt Media Anon. All of my links in one spot https://linktr.ee/just_human
Created28 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/realjust_human

Growth

31,45131,58331,5176 August 2026 — 31,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,583 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,564 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,505 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,472 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,461 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,451 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,431–31,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:5431,451-10
12 Aug 2026, 07:0231,461-11
11 Aug 2026, 06:0231,472-33
10 Aug 2026, 04:2031,505-19
9 Aug 2026, 03:1131,524-12
8 Aug 2026, 06:0231,536-28
7 Aug 2026, 08:0631,564-19
6 Aug 2026, 10:0131,583no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5331,583first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 31,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,290
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held27 (19 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total72,870
Reactions total884
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,020
Videos
1,230
Links
8,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,193 reactions across 24 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥77024.1%
👍72522.7%
54116.9%
👏37611.8%
🤪1504.70%
💯1394.35%
❤‍🔥1173.66%
🏆812.54%
😁732.29%
🤔672.10%
🤣652.04%
👀260.814%
🤯260.814%
🙏180.564%
😎60.188%
😨60.188%
👌40.125%
💔10.031%
😢10.031%
🥰10.031%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,370 views43 reactionsread 14 August 2026

The SPLC's Former CFO Was In a Romantic Relationship With a Right-Wing Extremist on SPLC's Payroll A 2nd Superseding Indictment Against SPLC Adds More Charges, Adds Former CFO as Defendant. As I and others have predicted would occur, a new superseding indictment adding more charges and another defendant has been filed this week in US v. SPLC. The added charges include wire fraud conspiracy, conspiracy to submit fa

👍25🔥161🤣1

13 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈1,930 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026

SPLC Says Federal Law Enforcement Used Some of the Same Informants —"What's the difference?" The SPLC has filed a motion to compel production of exculpatory evidence that it says is in the possession of the DOJ, FBI, DHS, and other federal agencies with which it has previously assisted or worked. The organization cites instances in which the same informants it paid and used to infiltrate extremist groups were also p

🤔26🔥11👍54

7 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC≈4,920 views117 reactionsread 14 August 2026

SPLC Fails to Get Fraud Case Dismissed, Judge Won't Accept "Orange Man Bad" Arguments Thread of highlights https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2085832808946155879.html Memo and Order https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.almd.90265/gov.uscourts.almd.90265.112.0_1.pdf Rumble vid https://rumble.com/v7dv708-judge-denies-the-splcs-motion-to-dismiss-and-the-order-is-well-worth-a-read.html YouTube vid htt

👍80🤣15👏106🔥6

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTCviews —

Just Human pinned «Just Human #376: Oxferd Comma, Fulton Co. 2020 Election Worker Subpoena, SPLC push for Show Cause In this episode, we go over the newly released Oxferd Comma investigation memos, which show that just days after Comey was fired, Acting FBI director Andy McCabe…»

7 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC≈4,260 views66 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Just Human #376: Oxferd Comma, Fulton Co. 2020 Election Worker Subpoena, SPLC push for Show Cause In this episode, we go over the newly released Oxferd Comma investigation memos, which show that just days after Comey was fired, Acting FBI director Andy McCabe opened a full investigation into Trump. The very next day, it was taken away from him and given to Special Counsel Mueller. We’ve long known this took place, b

50👍13🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈3,890 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Did the 2028 GOP primary begin today? https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2085414339805123050.html

🤔21

6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈8,790 views72 reactionsread 14 August 2026

The Oxferd Comma Memos: The FBI Investigated Trump as a Russian Asset, But Only For One Day. Just days after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, Acting FBI Director Andy McCabe opened a full investigation into the President. That investigation was titled 'Oxferd Comma,' the misspelling perhaps intentional so as to avoid FOIA searches should the name ever leak. This investigation sought to develop eviden

🔥59👍93🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC≈4,070 views85 reactionsread 14 August 2026

DOJ's Subpoena for Fulton County 2020 Election Worker Info QUASHED by District Court Fulton County, represented by Norm Eisen, Abbe Lowell, et al., has succeeded in quashing a subpoena for the contact information of thousands of workers and volunteers who worked the 2020 election, recount, and audit in the county. The judge found that the subpoena amounted to a fishing expedition, as it was overly broad, would not

👍30🤯26👀138🔥3💔1🤔1🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTCviews —

Just Human pinned «Just Human #375: Ramblings, Iran War, Ukraine War, WWIII, J5 Pipe Bomber, Fauci, Morens In this episode, I offer my observations and thoughts on the Iran and Ukraine conflicts, give updates on the J5 pipe bomber case, and highlight the many mentions of Fauci…»

30 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC≈5,740 views85 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Just Human #375: Ramblings, Iran War, Ukraine War, WWIII, J5 Pipe Bomber, Fauci, Morens In this episode, I offer my observations and thoughts on the Iran and Ukraine conflicts, give updates on the J5 pipe bomber case, and highlight the many mentions of Fauci in the David Morens indictment. Rumble: https://rumble.com/v7dgeke-just-human-375.html Substack: https://justhuman.substack.com/p/just-human-375 X: https://x

🔥65👍163😁1

30 Jul 2026, 00:51 UTC≈24,800 views233 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Whether it’s a Two-Minute Hate against Fauci, Comey, Biden, Trump, or some other villain assigned to us (deservedly or not) by leaders, influencers, the media, or our own animus… please take care not to step into that vortex of hatred. It’s a dark and dangerous place to venture into. It will turn you into a monster. You will take on the very attributes you once ascribed to the target of your rage. Guard your mind AN

❤‍🔥111💯70👍33🙏152😁2

29 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC≈13,100 views116 reactionsread 14 August 2026

The 29-page indictment of Dr. David Morens, Fauci’s former senior advisor, mentions Fauci 35 times. Thread https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2082160952988909578.html Video https://youtu.be/wLJep1Vkkeg https://rumble.com/v7dfzve-this-conspiracy-indictment-mentions-fauci-35x-in-just-29-pages.html

👍71🔥432

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @realjust_human. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 102,652 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Just Human ⭐️⭐️⭐️” (@realjust_human), 31,451 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realjust_human.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.