Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The People's Audit - Kris Jurski

@thepeoplesaudit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,220subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587700090
TypeChannel
Username@thepeoplesaudit
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thepeoplesaudit

Growth

3,2113,2203,215.56 August 2026 — 3,218 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,218 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,211 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,214 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,220 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,210–3,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:133,220+6
10 Aug 2026, 11:123,214+3
7 Aug 2026, 07:443,211-7
6 Aug 2026, 10:523,218no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:533,218first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 3,220 subscribers
Avg views / post
645
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total16,123
Reactions total702
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 23s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

702 reactions across 25 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬13819.7%
🙏13519.2%
👍12217.4%
💯11316.1%
🔥9713.8%
182.56%
😁182.56%
👀162.28%
😡131.85%
😱121.71%
👏111.57%
❤‍🔥30.427%
🤔20.285%
🤣20.285%
👎10.142%
😢10.142%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 702reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC463 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Solomon finally addressing the elephant in the room https://fxtwitter.com/Bannons_WarRoom/status/2085402133759746097

👍13🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC372 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @VeteranPatriots

US soldier in Germany invents wearable drone detector to protect front-line troops The device scans for radio signals associated with nearby drones, alerting soldiers when it detects one. The detectors come in varying sizes, ranging from one that fits in a pocket with one battery to larger models contained in a pouch that also holds three batteries. The parts cost under $120 and can be put together in under an hour

🔥22🙏9👍8

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC524 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/voter-files-in-arizonas-largest-county-illegally-obtained-in-2020-records-show-6072022

😡13💯3🙏3🤬2

6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC319 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sandyyyceee

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/stunning-new-evidence-reveals-68-cities-where-dem/

🔥10🙏7

6 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC471 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dems may have voted NO on some bills... But Reps controlled both houses of Congress and the Presidency. They only "claim" to be fighting for you like a carnival game operator claims you can win a big teddy bear if you buy one more round. And as long as elections are rigged, they will dance on the stage and ask for you donate to their campaign so they can act like they really care about you.

👍22💯8🙏3🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 01:39 UTC288 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WeTheMediaPhoto

https://x.com/i/status/2084632539663155689 @WeTheMedia

💯31🤬4🙏4

6 Aug 2026, 01:38 UTC227 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @candlesinthenightVideo

John Solomon: “I can tell you with 100% certainty that republicans are obstructing the investigation into weaponization… I can name by name, John Thune and Tom Cotton — who are Blocking the DOJ From Obtaining the Brennan Transcripts, and for some reason, Todd Blanche Has Failed to Force the US senate to Release them.” https://rumble.com/v7drq2k-republicans-are-obstructing-the-investigation-into-weaponization.html

🤬28🙏7

6 Aug 2026, 01:36 UTC207 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sdcanvasschannel

ICYMI: KNOWINK runs New Jersey's voter registration system. New Jersey's KNOWINK voter registration system has been shut down because of the massive amount of non-citizens on the voter rolls. KNOWINK is in half of the states in the country. KNOWINK's Total Vote system is hosted on the Microsoft Azure Government cloud platform which has been compromised by China. Confirmed by @SecWar KNOWINK/Bpro/Liberty Vote/Dominion

🙏15👍4🤬2

5 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC579 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

My livelihood stems from datacenters. I have been building online applications for over 26 years now. But the only thing I need to keep doing what I am doing is a secure facility with super-fast connection and consistent power. WHERE you put that facility makes little difference to me as long as you can keep that fast connection going. There is no shortage of “compute” for the average company or individual. In a few

👍12❤‍🔥3🙏32🔥2😢1

4 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC457 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

I guess Apple was like... "Stop talking about Epstien or you get the hose again!"

🤬9🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC442 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

and just a few moments ago...

😁182🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC435 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Earlier today, just before Telegram was removed from the App Store.

🔥151🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @thepeoplesaudit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 37,393 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The People's Audit - Kris Jurski” (@thepeoplesaudit), 3,220 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thepeoplesaudit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.