Channel
@QTSR2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,504subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002220896626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QTSR2 |
| Description | CABLE'S> WIRES> BEHIND THE SCENES QTSR OFFICIAL PAGE & DROPS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QTSR2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 18,504 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 18,518 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 18,534 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 18,538 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 18,549 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 18,559 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 18,564 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 April 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 48,200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
This scenario is 70% percent certain..... (These WIRES are hitting world wide from Japan to mil. Leaks from Pentagon.... )//// _ You always have to remember we are only moving information and are not beholden to 100% for certain outcome.... With this being said, these WIRES are hitting countries @KatistheSea3 in Truth Social 7-25-26 🇺🇸 Q The Storm Rider @ Patreon WE’RE GOING INTO THIS HUGE NUCLEAR EVENT STANDOFF. Th…
Native American Indigenous Retreat & Ceremonies Sept. 4-6 in Germany https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaqBztdtEaQ/?igsh=c2wyYmNjYTV3cDM3
@Katisthesea3 in Truth Social 7-10-26 🇺🇸 Q The Storm Rider @ Patreon THE WIRES: THE DEPT OF WAR IS GOING TO LET YOU KNOW ABOUT BASES, INTELLIGENCE, UFOs & UAPs ON THE MOON & THE REASON THEY’RE REALLY THERE. Eventually they’ll let you know about THE MOON SAND.. We’re talking about U.S. Military ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. Not the stuff you see on TV. That’s super old tech. WE’RE TALKING ABOUT CLOAKING.. Tech that allows MI…
https://truthsocial.com/%40KatistheSea3/116908632499862284?fbclid=IwY2xjawTA_IlleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAwzNTA2ODU1MzE3MjgAAR6cpHr6IC4ckOgb56dcYNtnBaQVer3jsU04OXJWysJIWWXS83BY7h48Cl_13g_aem_lTqS5o88pVgJxOnLpAJeZw&sfnsn=scwspmo
CIA whistleblower James Erdman details his sworn testimony on the deliberate cover-up of the Covid-19 lab leak origin by the intelligence community. He claims the IC downplayed the lab incident to protect pharma interests and push MRNA mandates, and reveals how Dr. Anthony Fauci influenced their assessments.
Trump let's NATO leaders that NATO countries are involved in U.S. stolen/ rigged elections (Acts of War).... here is the real WIRES and much more Free video from NEWS17CHANNEL (Q The Storm Rider podcast) in Patreon and Spotify.... Come join the Channel in Patreon/Spotify https://youtu.be/vE5WqL9reYE?is=LwLgT23b5qNyTElW
X-MEN / HYBRIDS/ CYBORGS . ALBANIA> KUSHNER> CHROMIUM<<<<< The REAL INTEL ( Please consider joining NEWS17CHANNEL in Patreon or Spotify and get the full weekly reports and videos) https://rumble.com/v7bz268-chromium.-albania-kushner-x-men-reality.html
Disclosure exposure of the House of london CABAL operations/// ( also side note: thank you for your donations to our campaign that we put out last week we reached our goal.. Thank you ❤️) https://youtu.be/oUajptOrlz0?is=UbHGB9l0CpoDiw9D
CHATTER]: DC LEADERS. INTEL AGENCIES. > >OBAMA TO FACE SUPEONAS OVER RUSSIAGATE > ELECTION INTERFERENCE, (USING INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO RUN OPERATE A COUP. SEDITION. TREASON) _ OBAMA is protected by immunity but he can not use 5th amendment and avoid questions//) > and if caught lying can face separate charges not related to his presidential immunity. Obama could face criminal charges for perjury (lying under oath)…
Please watch both videos here is the link to our donation sites please consider us thank you dear Spirits, Patriots and world Awakening movement light holders https://www.givesendgo.com /getting-a-home-in-europe?utm_source=sharelink&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_campaign=getting-a-home-in-europe https://t.me/TruthPups/245 https://paypal.me/AllenRonnie23?country.x=DE&locale.x=de_DE https://youtu.be/DD29SFzMnj8?is=fBaY…
https://youtu.be/DD29SFzMnj8?is=Z1kEwimcEHg1bDd7
☝ These videos are connected in certain ways 👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QTSR2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 121,149 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@QTSR2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ONLY DROPS QTSR” (@QTSR2), 18,504 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QTSR2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.