14 measurements spanning 13 days, net -149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,385–20,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 16:33
20,407
-12
18 Aug 2026, 15:23
20,419
-12
17 Aug 2026, 11:52
20,431
-18
16 Aug 2026, 03:34
20,449
-27
14 Aug 2026, 10:18
20,476
-7
13 Aug 2026, 00:18
20,483
-6
12 Aug 2026, 01:43
20,489
-5
11 Aug 2026, 01:14
20,494
-15
10 Aug 2026, 01:21
20,509
-8
8 Aug 2026, 21:43
20,517
-18
7 Aug 2026, 21:31
20,535
-17
6 Aug 2026, 21:20
20,552
-4
6 Aug 2026, 09:51
20,556
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:41
20,556
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
164.9%
avg views ÷ 20,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,700
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (12 December 2025 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
67,300
Reactions total
417
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,130
Videos
≈3,280
Links
≈1,620
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 29s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,506 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
1,036
23.0%
🤡
914
20.3%
🤣
502
11.1%
👍
444
9.85%
💩
318
7.06%
🖕
312
6.92%
🤬
264
5.86%
😈
236
5.24%
😁
116
2.57%
❤
104
2.31%
🔥
96
2.13%
👎
44
0.976%
👏
23
0.51%
🤮
21
0.466%
👀
14
0.311%
🥴
14
0.311%
🌭
9
0.2%
🙏
9
0.2%
🤨
8
0.178%
🤪
5
0.111%
8 further kinds
17
0.377%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,506reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hahaha oh man. Listen to how racist Democrat lawyer Marc Elias is. He says black people are less likely to have passports, and older blacks in the South weren’t even born in hospitals so they don’t have birth certificates.
This is his argument against voter ID. Yikes.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2083201355007549848
Adam Schiff says there is no evidence in the documents that China attempted to alter votes in the 2020 Election.
Rather, it was RUSSIA who interfered in the Election in an attempt to get Trump reelected 😂
Speaking of Russia, still patiently waiting on Schiff’s “evidence” he has that Trump colluded with Russia 🤡
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2079965414126239813
Washington Post’s David Ignatius says the quiet part out loud.
He’s asked if it would be nice if millions of Americans read through all the Chinese election interference documents.
His response says it all: “NO. I did it so they didn’t have to.”
They want you asleep. They want you ignorant. It’s how they get away with lying 24/7 without the sheep ever questioning a single thing.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/statu…
ABC News: “The President offered no proof that the Election in 2020 was stolen. There was nothing in the documents that spoke to some of what he said in his speech.”
Speaking of proof, remember when ABC News had proof that Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and killed the story? Good times.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2078852224885952736
CBS News: “President Trump has been lighting a fire of falsehoods about the 2020 Election… This Administration has found nothing to show or even hint that a SINGLE VOTE in America has been altered— a single election outcome manipulated.”
Reminder that CBS News reported on Russia collusion for YEARS without even a hint of evidence.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2078502479600259470
LOL John Brennan says Trump is misrepresenting the facts and misleading Americans regarding Chinese election interference in 2020.
During the interview, he doesn’t address a single thing Trump said or any piece of the declassified documents that were released.
They have no explanation. The only thing they can do is blatantly lie at this point.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2078217386763939918
Well well well… here’s Biden’s Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, stating UNDER OATH in 2024 that China did not attempt to change the outcome of the 2020 Election.
Look at the massive gulp she takes as she commits perjury.
These people are traitors.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2078133068691394743
You know Spencer Pratt had the election stolen from him when the media starts putting out their hit pieces.
Nothing to see here! It’s totally normal for the 3rd place finisher who conceded to make a miraculous comeback via mail-in ballots after Election Day! 🤡
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2063995756613091381
🤡 James Comey, appearing on MSNBC, accuses Kash’s FBI of “screwing around” with the crime stats, and says Kash won’t be able to clean up the FBI during his tenure.
He says the “quality people” (criminals) will hang on and the corrupt FBI will be back in business in short order.
This guy needs to be locked away for the rest of his miserable life.
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2055305749702557763
MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian on the Trump DOJ indicting James Comey: This is political weaponization of the Justice Department! Biden NEVER did this.
MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian on the Biden DOJ indicting Trump on 37 counts: This is the most DEVASTATING and POWERFUL indictment I’ve ever seen!
Ken Dilanian is a political operative for the Democrat Party and the furthest thing from a legitimate journalist.
https://x.com/patri0tcon…
One of Fauci’s top advisors, David Morens, was indicted today for his role in a COVID coverup and hiding email communications via a personal email account 💥
Here he is in 2024 getting grilled on this exact issue. He plays dumb and ends up pretending he can’t hear the questions 🤡
How satisfying to know that this scumbag is now facing justice.
Now do Fauci!!!
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/2049150193325465632
Hello frens. I’ve been posting almost exclusively to X these days. If you want to follow there, you can find me at the link below 😌
https://x.com/patri0tcontr0l
👍54👎41❤13😐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Patri0tsareinContr0l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 138,362 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸 @PepeMatter · 150,531 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
TheStormHasArrived17 @TheStormHasArrived17 · 94,472 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ @ElectionHQ2024 · 70,722 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
BioClandestine @bioclandestine · 140,795 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
And We Know® @andweknowLT · 87,706 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Praying Medic @praying_medic · 99,526 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat · 119,236 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Patri0tsareinContr0l ⭐️⭐️⭐️” (@Patri0tsareinContr0l), 20,407 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Patri0tsareinContr0l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.