Голос правды в потоке лжи.
----------------------------------------------
Зарегестрирован в РКН: N_012319
Для рекламы и предложений:
[email protected]
Мой RUTUBE: https://rutube.ru/channel/23480387
Created
22 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,702–9,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 12:37
9,722
+9
11 Aug 2026, 23:06
9,713
+8
6 Aug 2026, 17:35
9,705
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,707
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:56
9,707
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.34%
avg views ÷ 9,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
125 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
125
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 123 of 125 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
125 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
40,593
Reactions total
1,676
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,600
Videos
≈21,000
Links
≈17,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 52s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,676 reactions across 123 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
523
31.2%
😁
233
13.9%
🔥
141
8.41%
🙏
117
6.98%
🖕
104
6.21%
❤
67
4.00%
🤬
62
3.70%
🤮
62
3.70%
💯
56
3.34%
🤡
49
2.92%
👏
41
2.45%
😱
35
2.09%
💊
28
1.67%
🍌
25
1.49%
🤣
25
1.49%
💩
19
1.13%
🤝
16
0.955%
🤯
15
0.895%
🤔
12
0.716%
🥴
10
0.597%
12 further kinds
36
2.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Женская сборная России выиграла чемпионат мира по художественной гимнастике в командном многоборье.
Наши спортсменки набрали 278,300 балла. Команду России представляли Мария Борисова, София Ильтерякова, Арина Лавренова, Алиса Еремеева, Анна Николаева, София Солонская, Агата Барекзай и Дарья Мельник.
Второе место заняли спортсменки из Болгарии (276,050), тройку лидеров замкнули представительницы Китая (275,400).
В Днепропетровске снесли памятник советскому военачальнику Василию Маргелову.
Маргелов — уроженец Екатеринослава, Герой Советского Союза, участник советско-финской и Великой Отечественной войн, более двадцати лет командовал Воздушно-десантными войсками.
🇷🇺Подпишись на КРЫМЧАНИНА В МАХ 👉https://max.ru/Krymchanin_Z
Просьба Зеленского к США продать американские ракеты Patriot — это признак отчаяния, пишет Die Welt.
Острая нехватка боеприпасов ощущается во всём мире. Газета называет «плохими новостями для Зеленского» сообщения о резком сокращении запасов ракет в США из-за иранского конфликта.
При этом Трамп передумал давать третьим странам, в том числе Киеву, лицензию на производство снарядов для Patriot.
Польская газета Rzecz…
Зимой возможны графики поставок газа, - эксперт в области энергетики Корольчук.
А это как, спросят украинцы? Такого еще не было, но все происходит в жизни впервые и у этого есть причины, о которых украинцам знать не следует.
Мониторинговые каналы противника сообщают о поражении объектов ВСУ в Чугуеве Харьковской области, в Кировограде и в Кривом Роге
Также сообщается о том, что часть Кривого Рога осталась без света.
🇷🇺Подпишись на КРЫМЧАНИНА В МАХ 👉https://max.ru/Krymchanin_Z
На этой неделе в Европе прогремели взрывы на двух предприятиях оборонного профиля — заводе EMCO в Болгарии и подразделении KNDS в Италии. Оба объекта напрямую задействованы в обеспечении Украины вооружением и боеприпасами.
Болгарское предприятие EMCO специализируется на выпуске боеприпасов, совместимых с советской артиллерийской системой: в его номенклатуре — снаряды калибров 122 мм и 152 мм, реактивные боеприпасы д…
Спасибо всем тем,у кого есть возможность и желание поддержать мой канал :
НА БЛАГИЕ ДЕЛА👉: https://donatepay.ru/don/KRYMCHANIN
ДЛЯ ПОДДЕРЖКИ АВТОРА В ДЗЕН👉 dzen.ru/id/5fe07b13b9c8f5701fcdab30?donate=true
Карта ВТБ : 2200 2418 7978 9711
Карта Сбера: 4276 3000 6267 8407
ЮMoney: 4100 1763 5574 755
Мой ДЗЕН :
https://dzen.ru/id/5fe07b13b9c8f5701fcdab30
ВНИМАНИЕ,Я НА RUTUBE:
https://rutube.ru/channel/23480387/
Мой Teleg…
ВС РФ продолжают методичную работу по уничтожению объектов военной инфраструктуры противника
Очередная серия ударов — на этот раз по логистическим и топливным объектам ВСУ в Одесской и Днепропетровской областях.
В городе Белгород-Днестровский Одесской области поражены складские помещения, использовавшиеся ВСУ для хранения грузов военного назначения.
В посёлке Синельниково Днепропетровской области нанесён удар по А…
👍9❤2🖕2
Signed Крымчанин
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @Krymchanin_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Krymchanin_Z named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРЫМЧАНИН 🇷🇺 Z” (@Krymchanin_Z), 9,722 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Krymchanin_Z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
