Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لیان - آموزش امنیت و تست‌نفوذ

Channel

لیان - آموزش امنیت و تست‌نفوذ

@AcademyLian

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,980subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001078431791
TypeChannel
Username@AcademyLian
Description🔻مسیر ورود به حوزه تست‌نفوذ و امنیت ارتباط با ادمین : 🆔 @LianTrain کلیه حقوق متعلق به شرکت مهرنا رایانه لیان می‌باشد. 🌐 LianGroup.net ☎️ 021-91004151
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AcademyLian

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,94415,04114,992.514,9806 August 202612 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 99 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,929–15,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 13:5914,980+6
10 Nov 2026, 08:5514,974+26
8 Nov 2026, 22:0814,948+2
7 Nov 2026, 13:0514,946-1
6 Nov 2026, 16:1614,947-1
5 Nov 2026, 15:0614,948+1
4 Nov 2026, 15:3114,947+3
3 Nov 2026, 16:4514,944-1
2 Nov 2026, 14:3414,945-2
1 Nov 2026, 15:3714,947+1
31 Oct 2026, 15:1814,946-5
30 Oct 2026, 15:5614,951-4
29 Oct 2026, 18:2114,955-3
28 Oct 2026, 16:2814,958-3
27 Oct 2026, 16:5514,961-4
26 Oct 2026, 15:5514,965-8
24 Oct 2026, 20:3014,973-1
23 Oct 2026, 23:2814,974+4
22 Oct 2026, 21:1614,970+3
21 Oct 2026, 14:3914,967first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 14,980 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.479%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held55 (1 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total35,300
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,520
Videos
≈259
Links
≈1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29m 03s
Average length
29m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

758 reactions across 55 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27836.7%
🔥15520.4%
👍11815.6%
👌709.23%
👎709.23%
⚡91.19%
👏91.19%
😨70.923%
🤯70.923%
💯60.792%
❤‍🔥50.66%
😱50.66%
🙏40.528%
🥱40.528%
🏆20.264%
👀20.264%
😁20.264%
🤨20.264%
🎉10.132%
🤓10.132%
1 further kind10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 758 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,580 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⬅️ دوره SANS SEC575 - دوره تست نفوذ موبایل ⬅️ شروع دوره: پنجشنبه، 05 آذر 1405 ⬅️ با تدریس: مهندس مهرشاد علیزاده ⬅️ تخفیف 20% برای خرید نقدی: SEC575 ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و خرید: https://liangroup.net/academy/pentest-course/sans-575 🔄 توضیح کوتاه در مورد دوره: دوره SANS SEC575 به تحلیل امنیت و تست نفوذ اپلیکیشن‌های اندروید و iOS می‌پردازد و روش‌های شناسایی آسیب‌پذیری‌ها را با بررسی ساختار و رفتار برنامه آموزش می‌دهد…

👍4❤2🔥2👌1💯1

8 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤11👌2🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈3,010 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

◀️ انتشار کامل دوره آمادگی عملی برای ورود به SOC بصورت رایگان ◀️ با تدریس مهندس سجاد تیموری ◀️ مدت دوره: 19 ساعت 🎞 مشاهده در آپارات: قسمت اول | قسمت دوم | قسمت سوم | قسمت چهارم | قسمت پنجم | قسمت ششم | قسمت هفتم | قسمت هشتم | قسمت نهم 🎞 مشاهده در یوتیوب: قسمت اول | قسمت دوم | قسمت سوم | قسمت چهارم | قسمت پنجم | قسمت ششم | قسمت هفتم | قسمت هشتم | قسمت…

🔥9❤7👌1

6 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,820 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ آسیب‌پذیری ۱۰ ساله در OpenSSH؛ دور زدن احراز هویت SSH بدون دانستن رمز عبور! یک آسیب‌پذیری امنیتی با شناسه CVE-2026-123158 و نام *sshole در OpenSSH شناسایی شده که می‌تواند تحت شرایط مشخص، به مهاجم اجازه دهد بدون اطلاع از رمز عبور معتبر، فرآیند احراز هویت SSH را دور بزند. ◀️ جزئیات فنی آسیب‌پذیری ریشه این مشکل به تعامل OpenSSH با کتابخانه musl libc و نحوه پردازش مقدار بازگشتی تابع crypt() مربوط می‌شود. در سیستم‌ها…

👍10❤5👌2😨1

2 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,110 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👌6❤2⚡1👍1💯1🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,230 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍7👌1🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,120 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔥 هک ۶٫۳ میلیارد دلاری بایننس؛ ردپای گروه مرتبط با لازاروس بایننس اعلام کرده شامگاه ۲۹ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶، زیرساخت کیف پول‌های گرم این صرافی هدف حمله قرار گرفته و حدود ۶٫۳ میلیارد دلار دارایی رمزارزی از طریق برداشت‌های غیرمجاز سرقت شده است. 🔴 مسیر نفوذ چه بوده؟ بررسی اولیه، احتمال نفوذ از طریق لپ‌تاپ یکی از مهندسان DevOps و دسترسی مهاجم به سرویس ثبت برداشت‌ها را مطرح کرد. با این حال، بایننس در بررسی‌های بعدی از کشف نقاط نف…

🔥8👌1😨1

26 Oct 2026, 11:20 UTC≈5,310 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

☺️ شرکت مهرنا رایانه لیان (گروه لیان) ☺️ کارشناس تست نفوذ وب ◀️ دانش تخصصی و توانمندی‌ها: ☺️تسلط نسبی به ارزیابی امنیتی و آزمون نفوذ برنامه‌های کاربردی وب ☺️آشنایی عملی با OWASP Top 10 و OWASP Testing Methodology ☺️درک مناسب از مفاهیم امنیت شبکه، پروتکل HTTP/HTTPS و حملات رایج ☺️آشنایی با حداقل یکی از زبان‌های برنامه‌نویسی تحت وب (مانند JavaScript، PHP، Python یا .NET) ☺️تجربه در تهیه گزارش‌های فنی ت…

👍7❤1👌1💯1🔥1

21 Oct 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,990 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @LianSec

◀️ انتشار کامل دوره Network Packet Analysis بصورت رایگان ◀️ با تدریس مهندس پویان زمانی ◀️ مدت دوره: 32 ساعت 🎞 مشاهده قسمت در آپارات: قسمت اول | قسمت دوم | قسمت سوم | قسمت چهارم | قسمت پنجم | قسمت ششم | قسمت هفتم | قسمت هشتم | قسمت نهم | قسمت دهم | قسمت یازدهم | قسمت دوازدهم | قسمت سیزدهم | قسمت چهاردهم | قسمت پانزدهم | قسمت شانزدهم 🎞 مشاهده در یوتیوب: قس…

❤17🔥4👍2❤‍🔥1

20 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,820 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⬅️ دوره Secure Coding (برنامه‌نویسی امن) ⬅️ شروع دوره: پنجشنبه، 28 آبان 1405 ⬅️ تخفیف 20% برای خرید نقدی: coding-20 ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و خرید: https://lian.ac/Secure-Coding 🟣 اطلاع از شرایط اقساط: @liantrain 🔸 اطلاعات بیشتر: ☺️ 02191004151 | 😎 WhatsApp | 😎 Telegram 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

👍5❤2👎1👏1🔥1

19 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC≈4,090 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

◀️ حفاظت از اطلاعات از طریق رمزنگاری و امضای دیجیتال؛ آشنایی با GPG ◀️ با بهره‌گیری از GPG امکان رمزنگاری فایل‌ها و پیام‌ها وجود دارد تا تنها دارنده کلید خصوصی مربوطه بتواند به محتوای آن‌ها دسترسی یابد. همچنین، از طریق امضای دیجیتال می‌توان اصالت فرستنده و عدم دست‌خوردگی محتوا را تأیید نمود. در این ویدئو که توسط مهندس علی خوشرو (از دانشجویان بورسیه شرکت لیان) ضبط شده است، به صورت ساده و روان توضیح داده شده است که GP…

🔥8❤2

18 Oct 2026, 09:56 UTC≈3,890 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

◀️ انتشار رایگان دوره Network Packet Analysis ◀️ با تدریس مهندس پویان زمانی ◀️ مدت دوره: 32 ساعت 🎞 مشاهده قسمت چهاردهم در آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/v/cbdl5fk 🎞 مشاهده قسمت چهاردهم در یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOac4MA4tI0 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

❤13👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @AcademyLian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

آکادمی لیان
@ITRoadMap · 443
6 posts
آگهی شغلی حوزه امنیت سایبری
@LianJob · 3,042
6 posts
Cyber Warfar
@cyberwarfar · 2,746
2 posts
آموزش شبكه و امنيت
@denait · 21,029
2 posts
‹ NetWork & Security ›
@DrSecCom · 37,936
2 posts
Windows APP
@Narmafzarpc · 55,519
2 posts
آموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل
@Pc_IT_Mob · 92,000
2 posts
کانال تکنولوژی هوش مصنوعی
@roidbest · 1,618,779
2 posts
شاخه دانشجویی انجمن رمز دانشگاه بوعلی سینا
@sb_Basusc · 88
2 posts
اطلاع رسانی مسابقه BASU-CTF
@basu_ctf · 50
1 post
ترفند آموزش تکنولوژی و فناوری
@CEngineer93 · 102,305
1 post
کدینکس
@codinex_web · 28
1 post
کافه مهندس
@cofeeng · 112,311
1 post
Computer Science | علم کامپیوتر
@Computer_Science100 · 46,750
1 post
برنامه نویسان و توسعه دهندگان
@dev_Iranian · 171
1 post
GeekTown
@GeekTown · 983
1 post
امنیت سایبری | Cyber Security
@intsec · 16,404
1 post
کالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی
@kali_linuxxx · 76,515
1 post
Network infrastructure & Security with M.Kheradmand
@kheradmand_iT · 107
1 post
شبکه و امنیت،تکنولوژی،هوش مصنوعی
@Netwo0rk · 53,999
1 post
OnlineSecurity
@onlinesecurity · 1,373
1 post
⚔️ Ethical Hacking ⚔️
@Sajjad_Teymouri · 1,776
1 post
شبکه کاران
@shabake_karan · 25,629
1 post
Computer Software
@Software_computerr · 40,916
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آموزش شبكه و امنيت
@denait · 21,029
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Black Security Team
@Black_Security · 63,925
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
𝐍𝐎𝐕𝐀 𝐏𝐀𝐂𝐊𝐀𝐆𝐄
@Nova_Package · 25,689
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 October 2026
‹ NetWork & Security ›
@DrSecCom · 37,936
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
خبرگزاری سایبربان| Cyberban News
@cyberbannews_ir · 106,239
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
کالی بویز | ترفند | تکنولوژی
@Kaliboys · 28,520
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
کافه مهندس
@cofeeng · 112,311
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
شبکه کاران
@shabake_karan · 25,629
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر
@amuzesh_computer · 41,250
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Learn Python
@learnpy · 21,296
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming
@Azad_Developers · 37,380
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Λ/Organizaτiοn
@AOrgan · 49,742
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
پک لرن | Pack Learn
@PackLearn · 20,123
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 27 September 2026
مای سکیور | Mysecure
@mysecure1 · 29,378
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Computer Help
@P30_H3LP · 24,829
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
کالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی
@kali_linuxxx · 76,515
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
شبکه و امنیت،تکنولوژی،هوش مصنوعی
@Netwo0rk · 53,999
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
برنامه نویسی | پایتون
@Pythoni_Developers · 75,488
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Power electronics
@electronicghodrat · 19,291
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 October 2026
houshang_academy
@zameeni · 98,126
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Computer Science | علم کامپیوتر
@Computer_Science100 · 46,750
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر
@WorldCodeLists · 30,959
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
Computer Engineers
@VIP30T · 19,607
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 September 2026
مهندسی کامپیوتر
@maghalecomputer · 60,393
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لیان - آموزش امنیت و تست‌نفوذ” (@AcademyLian), 14,980 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AcademyLian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.