Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

لیان - آموزش امنیت و تست‌نفوذ

@AcademyLian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,027subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001078431791
TypeChannel
Username@AcademyLian
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AcademyLian

Growth

14,98515,02715,0066 August 2026 — 14,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,985 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,987 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,989 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,997 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,008 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,024 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,026 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,027 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,979–15,033 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:1815,027+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:0415,026+2
11 Aug 2026, 07:4715,024+16
10 Aug 2026, 08:4015,008+11
9 Aug 2026, 08:4114,997+8
7 Aug 2026, 05:5014,989+2
6 Aug 2026, 08:0114,987+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:2114,985no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:3214,985first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 15,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.374%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held23 (1 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total47,080
Reactions total176
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10838.8%
🔥6924.8%
👍4817.3%
👌186.47%
🤯72.52%
62.16%
😨51.80%
😱31.08%
❤‍🔥20.719%
👀20.719%
👎20.719%
👏20.719%
💯20.719%
🎉10.36%
😁10.36%
🤓10.36%
🥴10.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈6,530 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

◀️ بوت‌کمپ رایگان OWASP Top Ten 2024‌ ◀️ مدرس دوره: جناب مهندس میثم منصف ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و ثبت‌نام رایگان: https://lian.ac/srf 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

15👍5🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,750 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

◀️ دعوت به همکاری از مدرسین حوزه امنیت اطلاعات و امنیت سایبری آکادمی لیان در راستای توسعه دوره‌های تخصصی خود، از متخصصان و مدرسین حرفه‌ای حوزه امنیت اطلاعات و امنیت سایبری برای همکاری در برگزاری دوره‌های آموزشی رکورد شده (آفلاین) دعوت می‌کند. اگر در یکی از حوزه‌های تخصصی امنیت فعالیت می‌کنید و تجربه عملی مناسبی دارید، خوشحال می‌شویم با شما آشنا شویم. 🔴 حوزه‌های مورد نیاز شامل: تست نفوذ وب، شبکه و موبایل مرکز عملیات

4👍2

8 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,410 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ آسیب‌پذیری جدید در WordPress؛ از Pre-Auth XSS تا اجرای PHP یک آسیب‌پذیری امنیتی با شناسه CVE-2026-64638 در WordPress گزارش شده که از نوع Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) است. نکته مهم اینجاست که مرحله اولیه حمله می‌تواند قبل از احراز هویت انجام شود؛ یعنی مهاجم برای شروع Exploit لزوماً به حساب کاربری معتبر نیاز ندارد. در سناریوهای خاص، اگر مدیر سایت روی لینک یا Payload مخرب تعامل داشته باشد، مهاجم می‌تواند XS

🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈4,630 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

◀️ دوره جامع تست نفوذ وب‌اپلیکیشن ◀️ شروع دوره: چهارشنبه، 28 مرداد 1405 ◀️ مدرس دوره: جناب مهندس میثم منصف ◀️تخفیف 15% برای خرید نقدی: web-15 ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و خرید: https://lian.ac/web-pentest 🔽 اطلاع از شرایط اقساط: @liantrain 🔸 اطلاعات بیشتر: ☺️ 02191004151 | 😎 WhatsApp | 😎 Telegram 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

👍6

5 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,160 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی در cPanel؛ سرورهای هاست اشتراکی در معرض خطر آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی CVE-2026-58048 با امتیاز CVSS 9.4 در بخش مدیریت دیتابیس cPanel/WHM شناسایی شده است. یک کاربر دارای حساب معتبر cPanel و دسترسی به MySQL یا MariaDB می‌تواند از فرایند تغییر نام دیتابیس سوءاستفاده کرده و دستورات SQL را با سطح دسترسی Database Root اجرا کند. این نقص در سرورهای اشتراکی می‌تواند به دسترسی، تغییر یا حذف دیتابیس سایر کاربران

🔥8👏1😨1

2 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,120 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ وقتی DeepSeek وارد فاز حمله سایبری می‌شود پژوهشگران Unit 42 یک مهاجم چینی‌زبان را شناسایی کرده‌اند که مدل هوش مصنوعی DeepSeek را به ابزار Hermes Agent متصل کرده بود تا بخشی از فرایند حمله را به‌صورت نیمه‌خودکار اجرا کند. این عامل هوشمند وظایفی مثل شناسایی آسیب‌پذیری‌ها، جست‌وجوی اهداف اینترنتی از طریق FOFA، دانلود کدهای اثبات مفهوم یا PoC و آماده‌سازی مراحل Exploit را انجام می‌داد؛ یعنی کارهایی که معمولاً به زمان

🔥621👍1

2 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,740 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

◀️ شروع قطعی دوره جامع شبکه ◀️ شروع دوره: ‌شنبه، 24 مرداد 1405 - تخفیف 10%: net-10 ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و خرید: https://lian.ac/pfQ 🔽 اطلاع از شرایط اقساط: @liantrain 🔸 اطلاعات بیشتر: ☺️ 02191004151 | 😎 WhatsApp | 😎 Telegram 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

👍6👌1💯1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,420 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

☄️ وام دانشجویی لیان - ویژه ثبت‌نام در دوره‌های آنلاین امنیت و تست‌نفوذ ⚠️ بهترین راه‌کار ورود به حوزه امنیت اطلاعات با وام دانشجویی آکادمی لیان ✅ 15 الی 50 میلیون تومان ✅ بدون سود یا کارمزد ✅ با بازپرداخت 12 الی 24 ماهه 🔸 اطلاعات بیشتر: ☺️ 02191004151 | 😎 WhatsApp | 😎 Telegram 💻 🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

9👍3🔥1🥴1

27 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈2,100 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ وقتی ایجنت هوش مصنوعی برای قبولی در آزمون، مسیر هک را انتخاب کرد! شرکت OpenAI تأیید کرده است که یکی از ایجنت‌های آزمایشی این شرکت، هنگام ارزیابی توانایی‌های سایبری، از محیط کنترل‌شده یا Sandbox خارج شده و به زیرساخت‌های پلتفرم Hugging Face دسترسی غیرمجاز پیدا کرده است. هدف اصلی ایجنت، حل یک چالش امنیتی بود؛ اما به‌جای ادامه مسیر تعیین‌شده، راهی غیرمنتظره برای رسیدن به اطلاعات موردنیاز پیدا کرد. براساس گزارش‌های م

🔥7😱2👀1👍1😨1

26 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,860 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ هشدار فوری؛ آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی در هسته WordPress دو آسیب‌پذیری امنیتی با شناسه‌های CVE-2026-63030 و CVE-2026-60137 در هسته وردپرس شناسایی شده‌اند که در صورت ترکیب، می‌توانند مسیر اجرای کد از راه دور یا RCE را برای مهاجم فراهم کنند. آسیب‌پذیری CVE-2026-60137 به پاک‌سازی نادرست پارامتر author__not_in در WP_Query مربوط است و در شرایطی که افزونه یا قالب، ورودی کنترل‌نشده را به این پارامتر منتقل کند، امکان SQL Injectio

👌8❤‍🔥2🔥1😨1

26 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,560 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

◀️ شروع قطعی دوره جامع مقدمات تست‌نفوذ ◀️ شروع دوره: پنج‌شنبه، 8 مرداد 1405 - تخفیف 15%: pentest-15 ☺️ مشاهده جزئیات دوره و خرید: https://lian.ac/pentest 🔽 اطلاع از شرایط اقساط: @liantrain 🔸 اطلاعات بیشتر: ☺️ 02191004151 | 😎 WhatsApp | 😎 Telegram 💻 گروه لیان ☺️ https://liangroup.net/ ☺️ @AcademyLian

👍61

25 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,830 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ هشدار فوری برای مدیران Check Point آسیب‌پذیری بحرانی CVE-2026-16232 با امتیاز CVSS 9.3 در فرایند ورود SmartConsole شناسایی شده و طبق اعلام Check Point، در حملات واقعی مورد بهره‌برداری قرار گرفته است. این نقص به مهاجم بدون احراز هویت اجازه می‌دهد یک Application Login Token دریافت کرده و از طریق SmartConsole با دسترسی کامل مدیریتی وارد Security Management Server شود؛ سطح دسترسی‌ای که می‌تواند مدیریت Policyها و تنظیم

🔥6👌21👀1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AcademyLian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,159 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کافه مهندس
@cofeeng · 113,950
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Python Forever
@PythonForever · 129,963
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لیان - آموزش امنیت و تست‌نفوذ” (@AcademyLian), 15,027 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AcademyLian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.