5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,593–9,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:38
9,596
-7
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
9,603
-12
6 Aug 2026, 21:41
9,615
-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
9,616
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:08
9,616
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 9,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.528%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
23 (16 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
14,403
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
114
65.1%
❤
51
29.1%
👍
5
2.86%
🔥
4
2.29%
👌
1
0.571%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔮آموزش K9s؛ مدیریت سریعتر و سادهتر کوبرنتیز
اگر بهصورت روزانه با کوبرنتیز کار کرده باشید، احتمالاً بارها برای بررسی وضعیت پادها، مشاهده لاگها یا ویرایش YAML، بین چند دستور مختلف جابهجا شدهاید.
🔘ابزار K9s برای سادهتر کردن همین تجربه توسعه داده شده است؛ یک رابط کاربری متنی برای مشاهده، پیمایش و مدیریت منابع کوبرنتیز، بدون نیاز به اجرای مکرر دستورهای مختلف.
در این مطلب:
• توضیح دادهایم K9s چیست و چه کاربردی …
تفاوت Shell، Terminal، Console و Command Line چیه؟ 🤔
اینها اغلب بهجای هم استفاده میشن، ولی دقیقاً یکی نیستن:
- ترمینال (Terminal)
پنجره یا برنامهای که با آن متن وارد میکنی و خروجی میبینی.
مثال: Windows Terminal، GNOME Terminal، iTerm2
- شل (Shell)
برنامهای که دستورهای تو را میفهمد و اجرا میکند.
مثال: Bash، Zsh، PowerShell، Fish
- خط فرمان (Command Line)
خودِ روش تعامل متنی با سیستم؛ یعنی تایپ د…
راننده اسنپ بهم گفت پایتون به درد نمیخوره چون همه چی توش آمادهاس..!
تصمیم گرفتم یه ویدیو بسازم و در این مورد حرف بزنم:
https://youtu.be/CwnyWATu0zQ
خوشحال میشم شما هم نظراتتون رو بنویسید
#python #youtube
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
@programmers_gathering
5 کتاب عالی توی سطوح مختلف برای جاوا اسکریپت 🔥
Eloquent JavaScript (4th Edition)
بهترین کتاب برای یادگیری جاوااسکریپت از پایه با تمرینهای کاربردی.
You Don't Know JS Yet
مجموعهای عمیق برای درک مفاهیم داخلی و پیشرفته جاوااسکریپت.
JavaScript: The Definitive Guide (7th Edition)
مرجع جامع و کامل برای یادگیری و مراجعه در تمام سطوح.
JavaScript: The Good Parts
آموزش نوشتن کد تمیز و استفاده از بخشهای قدرتمند زبان.
Secrets…
اگر براتون جالبه بدونید از چه ابزارها و نرمافزارهایی توی سریال MrRobot استفاده شده اینو بخونید:
https://alternativeto.net/lists/66/software-used-in-mr-robot/
#mrrobot #tools
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
@programmers_gathering
📣 هوش مصنوعی؛ دقیق، کاربردی و آیندهمحور
@rss_ai_ir
🤖 اینجا فقط یک کانال نیست — اینجا نقطهی تلاقی علم، فناوری و آیندهست!
جایی که هیاهوی شبکهها جاشو به دانش واقعی و تحلیل عمیق میده 👇
💡 منتظر چی باشی؟
🔹 بررسی فنی مدلهای روز مثل GPT-5، Gemini، DeepSeek، Qwen و Claude
🔹 معرفی ابزارها و پروژههای متنباز با لینک مستقیم GitHub
🔹 کاربردهای صنعتی هوش مصنوعی؛ از BCI و لیدار تا دیجیتالتوئین و رباتیک صنعتی
🔹 تحلیل امنیت…
چطور از گیتهاب استفاده کنیم؟
اگر هنوز کدهاتون رو توی کامپیوتر ذخیره میکنید، حتما این آموزش رو بخونید 😁
https://realpython.com/how-to-use-github/
#github
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
@programmers_gathering
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @programmers_gathering. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,969 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دورهمی برنامه نویسان” (@programmers_gathering), 9,596 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/programmers_gathering.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
