Channel
@programmers_gathering
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,567subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001016492087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @programmers_gathering |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/programmers_gathering |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 9,567 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 9,575 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 9,599 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 9,616 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 9,620 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 9,635 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 9,655 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 9,661 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 9,663 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 9,666 | +70 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 9,596 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 9,603 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 9,615 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 9,616 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 9,616 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
184 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 121 | 65.8% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 28.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.72% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.17% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.543% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😍 هرچی که یه مهندس کامپیوتر نیاز داره رو اینجا جمع کردیم: آموزشهای حرفهای، فایلهای رایگان، اخبار فناوری و تکنولوژی، فرصتهای شغلی ، کتاب و دوره های خارجی و ... 🔻بچه ها بزنید رو لینک با خیال راحت اد کنید کانال غیرمرتبط داخلش نیست.👇🏻 https://t.me/addlist/zyayYek1g143MThk
📍 مرجع آموزشهای هوشمصنوعی |علم داده و یادگیری ماشین @Ai_Tv ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍دنیای آموزش های موبایل و کامپیوتر @PcAndMob ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍دورههای رایگان به همراه گواهینامه @udemyforever ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍پردازش تصویر ایران @digital_image_processing ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍راهکار تحول هوش مصنوعی @NextBrain_ir ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍هوش مصنوعی دانشگاه تهران @MrArtificialintelligence ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📍انرژی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف @sharif_ene…
🔮آموزش K9s؛ مدیریت سریعتر و سادهتر کوبرنتیز اگر بهصورت روزانه با کوبرنتیز کار کرده باشید، احتمالاً بارها برای بررسی وضعیت پادها، مشاهده لاگها یا ویرایش YAML، بین چند دستور مختلف جابهجا شدهاید. 🔘ابزار K9s برای سادهتر کردن همین تجربه توسعه داده شده است؛ یک رابط کاربری متنی برای مشاهده، پیمایش و مدیریت منابع کوبرنتیز، بدون نیاز به اجرای مکرر دستورهای مختلف. در این مطلب: • توضیح دادهایم K9s چیست و چه کاربردی …
👍1
تفاوت Shell، Terminal، Console و Command Line چیه؟ 🤔 اینها اغلب بهجای هم استفاده میشن، ولی دقیقاً یکی نیستن: - ترمینال (Terminal) پنجره یا برنامهای که با آن متن وارد میکنی و خروجی میبینی. مثال: Windows Terminal، GNOME Terminal، iTerm2 - شل (Shell) برنامهای که دستورهای تو را میفهمد و اجرا میکند. مثال: Bash، Zsh، PowerShell، Fish - خط فرمان (Command Line) خودِ روش تعامل متنی با سیستم؛ یعنی تایپ د…
❤5
راننده اسنپ بهم گفت پایتون به درد نمیخوره چون همه چی توش آمادهاس..! تصمیم گرفتم یه ویدیو بسازم و در این مورد حرف بزنم: https://youtu.be/CwnyWATu0zQ خوشحال میشم شما هم نظراتتون رو بنویسید #python #youtube ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
😁6
5 زبان برنامهنویسی که توی 2026 ارزش یادگیری بالایی دارن: 1. Python 2. Go 3. Rust 4. Zig 5. Java (plus Kotlin) 🔻 منبع: کلیک کنید #programming ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
❤6
😂😂😂 #fun ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
😁21
5 کتاب عالی توی سطوح مختلف برای جاوا اسکریپت 🔥 Eloquent JavaScript (4th Edition) بهترین کتاب برای یادگیری جاوااسکریپت از پایه با تمرینهای کاربردی. You Don't Know JS Yet مجموعهای عمیق برای درک مفاهیم داخلی و پیشرفته جاوااسکریپت. JavaScript: The Definitive Guide (7th Edition) مرجع جامع و کامل برای یادگیری و مراجعه در تمام سطوح. JavaScript: The Good Parts آموزش نوشتن کد تمیز و استفاده از بخشهای قدرتمند زبان. Secrets…
❤1
اگر براتون جالبه بدونید از چه ابزارها و نرمافزارهایی توی سریال MrRobot استفاده شده اینو بخونید: https://alternativeto.net/lists/66/software-used-in-mr-robot/ #mrrobot #tools ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
❤5
لینوکسهای مخصوص برای کارهای مخصوص ✅ #linux ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
❤2
یاد گرفتین؟ 😁 #fun ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
😁4❤2
وای 😂😂😂 #fun ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ @programmers_gathering
😁15
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @programmers_gathering. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دورهمی برنامه نویسان” (@programmers_gathering), 9,567 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/programmers_gathering.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.