정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 진행되지 못하고 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다.

Channel
바코드 스터디카페
@barcodestudy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
551subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003478813231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @barcodestudy |
| Description | https://barcodetracker.xyz/ 코인으로 인생 망해서 공부라도 하렵니다 x.com/go_barcode |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 30 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/barcodestudy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 551 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 551 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.1%
- avg views ÷ 551 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 100
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.70%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 January 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 200 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 104
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 59
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 94.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://h00d.trade/ 정식은 아니고 맛뵈기. 불안정할 수 있음. 토큰 런치 기능, 유동성 제거 감지, 실시간성 확대 등등 잡다한거 다 때려넣음. 비전공자가 만들수록 UI/UX 가 가장 어려운 것 같음. 현재도 여전히 수정중…. Arc도 해야 할지 굉장히 고민이네
❤3
Maple TeamFight 만들어봤습니다. 직접 메이플을 플레이하는 유저로서 최대한 요소를 담아서 만들어봤습니다. 44명의 캐릭터, 19개의 시너지, 476개의 장비 아이템으로 나만의 조합을 만들고 스테이지를 돌파하는 메이플+롤토체스 게임입니다. 최종 웨이브까지 도전해보세요 (영상,게임 소리 ON 추천) 플레이하러가기
김치 프리미엄 : -0.91% USD/KRW : 1,543.8원 USDT/KRW : 1,529.7원
요즘 따리하기 정말 힘든것 같은데 생따리 정말 잘하시네..
20260609 H 갭 따리 H +4.0% 상황 정리 H가 새벽 부터 해킹인지 내부인지 재단인지 모르겠는데 엄청 던졌고 레갭이 발생한거 같습니다 다른 고수분들처럼 새벽에 50% 몇바뀌씩 돌린건 아닌데 그래도 덱스 > 빗썸 해서 조금 먹었습니다 코인원에 보낼까 빗썸 보낼까 하다가 빗썸 보냈네요 요새 덱스 보고 있었는데 바로바로 먹으니까 기분 좋네요 지알람이나 푸시오버나 좀 켜둬야겠습니다
청원링크 해당 글을 읽었을때 청원의 취지는 상당히 논리적으로 접근하는 글이어서 굉장히 잘 읽었는데 청원의 내용은 감정에 호소하고 코인러로서도 납득하기 어려운 내용이 많았는데 피카쌤께서 잘 정리해주셨네요
일어나서 다시 읽어보는데... 취지는 굉장히 좋습니다만 아쉬운 내용이 몇가지 있어 덧붙여 보겠습니다. 현재 청원의 내용에는 2), 3), 5)의 경우 특히나 조금 감정에 호소하는 느낌이 강해 가상자산 투자자 외의 사람들이 과연 공감을 할 수 있을까? 라고 생각이 드는 바, 제 개인적인 의견으로는.. 가상자산 시장을 파악하는 인프라가 이제야 갖춰지기 시작하고있고 준비가 되지 않은 시점에서 과세를 한다는 것은 오히려 그레이존을 더욱 심화시킬 가능성이 높다. 이는 같은 케이스에 대해 서로 다른 해석과 논란을 야기할 수 있으며 또한 세금을 내는 사람 뿐 아니라 걷는 정부의 입장에서도 혼란을 일으킬 것이다. 물론 수익을 증명하고 이에 대해 발생한 수익에 대해 세금을 내는 것은 당연하다고 볼 수 있으나 현재 인프라에서는 이 넓은 섹터들에서 내가 어…
대성연쌤
Claude에게 "이걸 해" Claude에게 "코드 작성해" Claude에게 "이 오류를 고쳐"라고 말하는 걸 그만둬. 너는 실제로 노련한 인공지능을, 초보 인턴처럼 사용하고 있어. 여기 직접 복사-붙여넣기 해서 쓸 수 있는 10개의 Claude 프롬프트야 1. 생산 수준 기능 개발자 (Production Feature Builder) 생산 준비가 된 기능을 개발하는 데 책임을 지는 시니어(고급) 소프트웨어 엔지니어처럼 행동하세요. 목표는 깨끗한 아키텍처로 확장 가능하고 지속 가능한 기능을 설계하고 개발하는 것입니다. 코드를 작성하기 시작하기 전에: 요구사항을 분석하고, edge case(경계 상황)를 식별하며, 아키텍처를 정의하고 구현 계획을 수립하세요. 그 후 단계별로 개발하세요. 기능: [기능을 정의하세요] 사용자: [대상 사…
❤1
베이스드 바이빗 상장예정 https://x.com/bybit_official/status/2037439481649693161?s=46
리졸브 트윗 원문
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @barcodestudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“바코드 스터디카페” (@barcodestudy), 551 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barcodestudy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.