Channel
@Mreza_Danaei
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,311subscribers
-459 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001149891794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mreza_Danaei |
| Created | 18 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mreza_Danaei |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 19,311 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 19,324 | -33 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 19,357 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 19,397 | -22 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 19,419 | -39 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 19,458 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 19,481 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 19,491 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 19,502 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 19,511 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 19,522 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 19,533 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 19,540 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 19,548 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 19,558 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 19,569 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 19,574 | -18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 19,592 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 19,618 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 19,627 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 May 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,750 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
120 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 61 | 50.8% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 16.7% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 10.8% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 7.50% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 5.00% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بهتره کاخ سفید یه نیمچه هزينهای هم برای هوش مصنوعی بکنه! این ویدیو بیشتر از اینکه قدرت آمریکا را نشان بدهد، حسِ "نسخه رایگانِ هوش مصنوعی" میده! 😂 بالاخره کاخ سفیده، نه کانال تلگرامی! 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
😁26👎14❤3🗿1🤪1
الان که بیشتر فکر میکنم، میبینم باید برم اسبسواری فقط قوانین تردد اسب توی شهر رو کسی میدونه؟
😁19🤔4👌3❤1👎1🤬1
من این اشتباه رو کردم شماها نکنید 😅
😁15👎5🤬5🤪2👌1🤔1
هر وقت تونستید پدرِ خودروسازیای رو دربیارید که ۶۰ ساله داره پدرِ ملت رو درمیاره، اونوقت بیاید از "درآوردن پدر ملت" با بنزین 87 هزارتومانی حرف بزنید!😏 هروقت قیمت خودرو و حقوق جهانی شد، اونوقت قیمت بنزین رو هم جهانی کنید.😏 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
👌9❤3
ادعای اینکه "عاصم منیر شیعه است و به همین دلیل ایران به او اعتماد کرده" درست نیست و او عموماً یک نظامی سنیِ محافظهکار شناخته میشود. وقتی یک تحلیل بر یک گزاره نادرست بنا شود، نتیجهاش هم قابل اتکا نیست. 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
👏2
وقتی بوی جنگ یا قطعی اینترنت میاد، برای دل خودم این کارارو میکنم: ۱. همهی دیوایسها و اپلیکیشنهام رو آپدیت میکنم. ۲. پاوربانکها و پاوراستیشن و هر کوفت و زهره مار برقی رو کامل شارژ میکنم. (باوجودیکه میدونم تهش دو سه روز جواب بده) ۳. مخزن آب و بطریهای خالی رو چک میکنم و پرشون میکنم. (محض دلخوشی) ۴. کیف اضطراری هم نمیبندم؛ حس میکنم اگر قرار باشه اتفاقی بیفته، اون کیف تفاوتی ایجاد نمیکنه. ۵. دعا میکنم و…
گاهی یک تماس تلفنی، از صدها تحلیل و خبر گویاتر است 🔹پس از انتشار خبر دستگیری فرد متهم به آزار و اذیت دختران، این بانو با تحریریه گروه رسانهای «خبرهای فوری مهم» تماس گرفت؛ با صدایی که هنوز ردِ سالها رنج در آن شنیده میشد. 🔹او گفت خودش نیز روزی قربانی خشونت و ظلم بوده و امروز، از دیدن برخورد پلیس با چنین افرادی احساس امنیت و امید کرده است. از پلیس، رسانهها، مردم و همه کسانی که اجازه نمیدهند صدای قربانیان نادیده گر…
❤1
تصور نمیکردم روزی بابت انتشار سخنان خود یک مسئول، طرف شکایت همان مسئول قرار بگیریم. آقای سید محمود نبویان از گروه رسانهای خبرهای فوری مهم به اتهام افترا، نشر اکاذیب شکایت کرده، رسانهای که فقط روایت و اظهارات ایشون رو پوشش داده بود. 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
😁1
از صبح تا الان، دفتر تحریریهمون پر از تماس و پیام از شهرهای جنوبی بوده. حرف اکثر خانوادهها یکیه: «دیشب با صدای انفجار خوابیدیم، صبح هم بچهمون با استرس رفت سر جلسه امتحان حضوری.» همین چند دقیقه پیش هم یکی از مخاطبهامون پیام داد: «سر جلسه امتحان در بندرعباس بودیم که صدای انفجار اومد...» واقعیت اینه که این نگرانی قابل درکه. وقتی دانشآموز و دانشجو با اضطراب و احساس ناامنی سر جلسه امتحان میشینه، سخته! به نظر می…
انتقام خون سید علی خمینی؟ 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
حجازی کشته شد. /اینترنشنال و اسرائیل ١٠ اسفند ١۴٠۴ تصویر حجازی و قالیباف در تشییع رهبری /١٩ تیر ١۴٠۵ 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
اگه تو اوج جنگ ایران و عراق، کسی به صدام میگفت: سرنوشتت تو عراق سیاهچاله و چوبهداره؛ اما رهبر ایران روزی در عراق و در میان انبوهی از مردم تشییع میشه، هیچکسی باورش نمیشد. عجب تاریخی رو داریم زندگی میکنیم... 📱📱 @Mreza_Danaei
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mreza_Danaei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“️محمدرضا دانایی | Mreza Danaei️” (@Mreza_Danaei), 19,311 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mreza_Danaei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.