Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,599–3,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 07:11
3,797
+31
5 Nov 2026, 12:45
3,766
+10
2 Nov 2026, 09:09
3,756
+10
30 Oct 2026, 17:08
3,746
+7
27 Oct 2026, 15:19
3,739
+7
24 Oct 2026, 07:07
3,732
+2
20 Oct 2026, 23:56
3,730
+9
17 Oct 2026, 16:49
3,721
+17
15 Oct 2026, 00:01
3,704
+5
11 Oct 2026, 16:40
3,699
-4
5 Oct 2026, 06:56
3,703
+11
26 Sept 2026, 18:01
3,692
+19
17 Sept 2026, 23:19
3,673
-7
13 Sept 2026, 11:37
3,680
+11
9 Sept 2026, 07:01
3,669
+15
3 Sept 2026, 13:56
3,654
+17
30 Aug 2026, 23:06
3,637
+3
24 Aug 2026, 23:09
3,634
+5
21 Aug 2026, 06:03
3,629
+3
18 Aug 2026, 04:42
3,626
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 26s
Average length
3m 17s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
633 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
579
91.5%
👎
54
8.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 رعدی آذرخشی؛ از دبیرستان فردوسی [تبریز] تا اندیشههای فردوسی
به بهانهٔ پانزدهم مردادماه، سالروز درگذشت رعدی آذرخشی
✍️ فاطمه محمدزاده
غلامعلی رعدی آذرخشی، شاعر، نویسنده، محقق و سیاستمدار، در اول مهرماه ۱۲۸۸ در تبریز متولد شد. تحصیلات خود را در دبیرستان محمدیه و فردوسی تبریز گذراند و در دبیرستان فردوسی با محمدحسین شهریار، همدرس بود. سال ۱۳۰۶ را باید نقطهٔ عطفی در زندگی هنری و شاعرانگی رعدی دانست. در این سال ب…
🔴 راهنما برای آموزش شاهنامه به کودکان و نوجوانان
نامِ کتاب: «با کودکان شاهنامه بخوانیم»
نویسنده: جواد رنجبر درخشیلر
ناشر: نشر همرخ
به گزارش خبرگزاری کتاب ایران، «با کودکان شاهنامه بخوانیم» کتاب راهنمای والدین و مربیان برای آموزش شاهنامه به کودکان و نوجوانان ده تا هفده ساله است. نویسندهٔ این کتاب، جواد رنجبر درخشیلر، شاهنامهپژوه و دانشآموختهٔ دکتری علوم سیاسی است که سالها تجربه آموزش شاهنامه به بزرگسالان و کود…
🔴 شکوه مشروطیت؛ ابداع نوآیین در انطابق با منطق وجودی کشور
✍️ درگاه تلگرامیِ «سیاستِ ملّی»
مجلس دارالشورای ملّی بهعنوان مجلس مؤسسانِ نهادهای نوآیین دولت-کشور ایران، در شرایطی که بحران عمیق در حوزههای مختلف حیات ایرانیان فراگیر شده بود، دست به ابداعی استراتژیک در تأسیس نهادی زد؛ انتخابی برخاسته از آگاهی مؤسسان و در عین حال، مقید به مقدورات و الزامات ناشی از روح زمانه، مناسبات نیرو و امکانات موجود.
آگاهی مؤسسان، …
🎙 سخنرانی جواد طباطبایی - فیلسوفِ سیاسی ایران - پیرامونِ پیدایشِ مفهوم «مشروطه» در ایران
ایراد شده در مرکز مطالعاتِ ایرانی ساموئل جردن کالیفرنیا در اردیبهشت ماه ۱۴۰۱ خورشیدی
@IranDel_Channel
💢
🎥 دور مشروطهخواهان آمد...
ای امان از فراقت، امان
مُردم از اشتیاقت، امان
از که گیرم سراغت، امان (امان امان امان امان)
مژده ای دل که جانان آمد
یوسف از چَه به کنعان آمد
دور مشروطهخواهان آمد (امان امان امان امان)
عارف و عامی سر می نشستند
عهد محکم به ساقی بستند
پای خم توبه را بشکستند (امان امان امان امان)
چشم لیلی چو بر مجنون شد
دل ز دیدار او پر خون شد
خون شد از راه دل بیرون شد (امان امان امان امان)
شکرلله که …
🔴 «اساس مشروطیّت، جزئاً و کلاً تعطیلبردار نیست.»
نگاهی کوتاه به اصلِ هفتمِ متمم قانون اساسی مشروطه، به مناسبت سالروز صدور فرمان تأسیس مجلس شورای ملی
✍️ حامد عامری گلستانی
اصل هفتمِ متمم قانون اساسی مشروطه، یکی از مهمترین اصول آن است، که میتوان آن را محافظِ بنیان و اساسِ مشروطیت دانست.
عموماً هنگامی که سخن از مشروطیت به میان میآید، در کنار بحث دربارهٔ اساس آن، که مبتنی بر Constitution و اصولِ حکومتِ قانون است…
🔴 مفهوم و مصداق «جدید در قدیمِ» تاریخ معاصر/ تزهای ۱۴ و ۱۵ کتاب تأملی دربارهٔ ایران
✍ جواد طباطبایی؛ فیلسوف سیاسی ایران
در تاریخ و تاریخ فرهنگ ایرانِ پیش از آغاز دوران جدید، پیوسته، وجوهِ جدیدی وجود داشته است. تجربههای ایرانیان، در ۱۵۰ سال اخیر، در تجددخواهی، همچون گامهایی برای بازیابی این نقطههای قوّت بوده است: دربارهٔ اهمیت دریافت ایرانیان از «ملَت»، «دولت» و «وحدت در کثرتِ ممالک محروسهٔ ایران» پیشتر اشاره…
🔴 ایرانِ تمدنی؛ تقدّم امرِ ملّی و تأخر قومیّت
✍️ علی سعیدیاننژاد
ایران یک کشورملتِ تمدنی، قدیم و تاریخی است. ایران به عنوان یک پدیدار تمدنی علاوه بر این که یک واحد جغرافیایی است، به مثابه یک صورتبندی متداوم تاریخی ملی فهم میشود. تاریخ ایران همواره تاریخِ ملی بوده است و پیش از جعل واژۀ ملی، ایرانیان دارای زیست جمعی ملی بودهاند. امر ملی در تاریخ ایران به عنوان تمدن ایرانی و حافظۀ جمعی ایران و نه صرفاً آنچه دول…
🔴 «منافع الحَیَوان» و پاسخی متقن دربارهٔ زبان [قدیم] آذربایجان
✍️ عرفان ایمانی دارستانی
زاید[،] برپای ایستاده تا چون بر زمین اُفتَد استخوانش شکسته نشود و پیل[فیل] را شهوت اندک باشد.
چون آرزوی کَسی کُنَد بِزَمینهاءِ[به زمینهای] شرقیِ ولایتِ خویش رود[،] مَرغزاری اندر که گُلِ لقاح[،] بسیار باشد و بوی[بو] میکُنَد و میخورَد تا شهوت زیادت گَردد و ماده با او باشد و از نَر جدا نشود چون کَس آید تباهی و زیان بنیان کن…
👍33👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @IranDel_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @IranDel_Channel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دیپلماسی @Bestdiplomacy · 19,746 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
Discourse @Discourseees · 25,238 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
راه نو🖤 @Newwaypolitics · 21,932 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایراندل | IranDel” (@IranDel_Channel), 3,797 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranDel_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.