Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
مَرد سانفرانسیسکویی
@In_Search_of_San_Francisco
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,119subscribers
+867 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001330200081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @In_Search_of_San_Francisco |
| Description | آنجا که زندگیکردن آرزویِ من است. پریودیکهای ذهنی یک غمنالهنویس سانفرانسیسکویی #برنامهنویسی #پایتون #فنبیان #استخدام #رسپی #گیتار #طراحی #حسابداری #تعمیرات #کسبدرآمد #لاتاری #فیتنس #انگیزشی #پادکست #یوتوبر #گرافیتی #آموزش #معرفی #فنی_حرفهای #ربات |
| Created | 30 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/In_Search_of_San_Francisco |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 18,119 | +34 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:57 | 18,085 | +58 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:38 | 18,027 | +19 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:14 | 18,008 | +20 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 17,988 | +24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:30 | 17,964 | +16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:19 | 17,948 | +13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 17,935 | +15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 17,920 | +22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 17,898 | +31 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 17,867 | +12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 17,855 | +10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 17,845 | +9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 17,836 | +8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 17,828 | -9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 17,837 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 17,839 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 17,826 | +13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 17,813 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 17,810 | first reading |
Engagement
304 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.4%
- avg views ÷ 18,119 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,060
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 58
- of 304 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 304 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 119,374 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,280
- Videos
- ≈1,220
- Links
- ≈3,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 56s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,893 reactions across 244 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,893 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 246 of the 304 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,014 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
برای دوستش در نامهای نوشت: آنان که سعی در شکستن تو میکنند، شاهد اوج گرفتن و پرواز کردنت خواهند بود.
یکی از قشنگترین موزیکهای هوشمصنوعی که شنیدم. @In_Search_of_San_Francisco
بارانندیده را عشق پاییز نمیفهمد.
من از چاق گذشتهام؛ میدونی یعنی چی؟ یعنی برای تمام عذابی که به سرم اومد، غصهخوردم، چاق شدم، از ریخت افتادم، از تمام سیاهیها و تاریکیهای ذهنی و روحیم گذشتم و بعد از سالها تباهی، دوباره به خود واقعیم برگشتم. من رو با کسی قیاس نکن.
اشتباهاتت نشون میده درحال تلاشی.
دلیربودن به معنی نترسبودن نیست؛ ترس همیشه وجود داره، فقط آدمها انتخاب میکنن که با وجود ترس، بجنگن یا فرار کنن.
هیجان بیشاز اندازه در هر چیزی جدی منو میترسونه.
اونجا که قلب و روحت هممسیر میشه برای اینکه چیزی رو به کسی بگی، اما لحظهی آخر کلامت رو میخوری و سکوت میکنی؛ اونجا شاید کلامی منعقد نشه اما پیامت به قلبِ طرفِ مقابل میرسه؛ حتی اگر فرسنگها ازت فاصله داشته باشه.
گاهی هم اینقدر توی فشاری که هرچیزی که توی دستهات داری رو رها میکنی؛ چون چیزی که توی سرته، از چیزی که توی دستهاته سنگینتره.
Photo, posted without a caption
شاید بعضی دلتنگیها برای خودِ آدما نباشن؛ برای معنایی باشن که ما به حضورشون داده بودیم.
Showing the 12 most recent of 304 posts we hold for @In_Search_of_San_Francisco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@In_Search_of_San_Francisco edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @In_Search_of_San_Francisco as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 14 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 27 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@HadisPsychologist · 15,7187 postsروزمرگیهای یک رواندرمانگر
@DarmangarDanial · 28,3436 postsزندگیِ اشتباهی
@wrong_llife · 4123 postsDreamer.
@BitaNoT · 3342 postsFOu!
@F0o0u · 8,4012 posts🍂✨⟨اورکا⟩
@ThelonelistwhaleB · 4372 postsرا.
@channellra · 1,1852 postsEmily
@emilyypi · 1,8372 postsهُبوط
@hobotm · 2,9152 postsmim
@mimism · 8,5222 postsufo
@nassiminufoo · 17,1462 postsآبیِ سنگین
@prvaz_ir · 1,3702 postsشهرِ یار
@rshaheryar · 7392 postsAeonian
@AeonianMoon · 9261 postنجواهایِ شبانه
@Ambivert_0715 · 5201 postAnna
@Annadailyyy · 6681 postیادداشتهای رهاییِ من_🪐
@D_Yalom · 1361 postمنی که تمام میشود.
@EndOfMe405 · 1,1861 postحرمانم!
@Hermaniem · 6661 postOut Of Matin
@Matinello · 10,2161 postمَــــتروڪِـہ ༺📓
@aeropain · 4171 postaftersome.
@aftersomee · 2,6991 postاَرغند
@arqandchnel · 4351 postBlueberry
@bllueberryhome · 1,0221 post~Déesse~
@callmedeesse · 1671 postचंद्र मुखी چَندراموکی
@chandra_mukhi · 7571 postEL vIsiOn
@channelel98vision · 5,1111 postدر مقام یک پیرزن.
@darmaqamyekpirzan · 2301 postÉlodie de Minuit
@elodiedeMinuit · 2591 postمن !
@fandoghtweets · 7,0671 postقند🌱
@ghandzendegii · 681 postگنجشک های مرده
@gonjeshkhaye_morde · 4,7481 postهمینطوری دوست داشتم فور بزنم
@hellothisismeyouwerelookingat · 111 post𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐀
@imusic_nana · 2781 postThe Unspoken
@ithinkyoushouldknow · 3491 postمـلـجاْ 𖥔
@itsmalaja · 1711 postجیبِ دل.
@jebbDellm · 2,6841 post505
@kafartt · 3221 postکُنجی در هیاهوی زمان
@konjidarhayhuyezaman · 2,8241 postVita Mia🍁
@la_mia_vitaaa · 1041 postآبیتریننارنجی
@ltsme_official · 1,8531 postدِژاوو
@lumadejavu · 10,3011 postنارنگی
@maeffar · 6831 postMah
@mahchnle · 2,4491 postمن یافارم|
@manyafaram · 8,4131 postماتسویاما🎐
@matsuoyama · 4791 postabditory
@melikachanl · 10,0511 postMightyAphrodite
@mightbeamightyafroditte · 481 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 63 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@mimism · 8,5228 postsردِ نور
@Radenooor · 5935 postsمثلاً روانشناسم!
@HadisPsychologist · 15,7184 postsروزمرگیهای یک رواندرمانگر
@DarmangarDanial · 28,3433 postsمنی که تمام میشود.
@EndOfMe405 · 1,1863 postsعاشق تمام خواهد شد.
@azghambego · 2,0403 postsMaybe In Another Life🍁
@maybeinanotherlife2024 · 3913 postsufo
@nassiminufoo · 17,1463 postsمن چراغها را روشن میکنم.
@roshantarin · 6,6723 postsAeonian
@AeonianMoon · 9262 postsBaHadis
@EnglisHadis · 3,2522 postsنیلسآ🪁
@Nila_nik7 · 1,7772 postsو دیگر جوان نمیشوم
@NotGettinAnyYounger · 1,2962 postsواگویه ›
@Vaguooyeh · 5,8262 postsآنهشرلی𐙚
@anesherlliii · 1,9802 postsEL vIsiOn
@channelel98vision · 5,1112 postsمن !
@fandoghtweets · 7,0672 postsجایی پایین جاده
@ftm_shargi · 1,3322 postsHaven
@ihaven19 · 2612 postsLiminal Glow
@kaziima · 1,7812 postsکُنجی در هیاهوی زمان
@konjidarhayhuyezaman · 2,8242 posts-جستجوگرِ نور”
@lilslight · 2,6552 postsمخفیگاه من
@makhfigaheman · 4,0012 postsماتیلدای خسته
@tiredmatilda · 8,2562 posts𝐧𝐚𝐢𝐯𝐞
@Arsiviolinist · 4231 postlikthemoon
@HeyItsmahii · 7131 postکافه مستاجر پلاک ۱۲
@HouseNumberrr12 · 2,3921 postاَرغند
@arqandchnel · 4351 postقطعاً قهرمانی در کار نیست.
@chibegammvalla · 1,3351 postزاڕا؛
@diizara · 741 postتلختر از کون خیار.
@eybaaaba · 1,9611 postفانِوشت
@fanevesht · 1531 postA Girl In Green
@girliingreen · 2281 postگمشدگان برای همیشه
@gomshdgn · 2,1671 postگنجشک های مرده
@gonjeshkhaye_morde · 4,7481 post_overthinker_
@heyoverthinker · 1,2361 postهِزارتو
@hezar2journy · 6171 postهُبوط
@hobotm · 2,9151 post𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐀
@imusic_nana · 2781 postامیری
@imxamiri · 1,5341 postThe Unspoken
@ithinkyoushouldknow · 3491 postخط فاج
@khatefaj · 2,3931 postدِژاوو
@lumadejavu · 10,3011 postنارنگی
@maeffar · 6831 postMah
@mahchnle · 2,4491 postمن؛ سارا
@mansaraa · 1,5881 postMary's
@maryshomeishere · 4,2131 postMavie
@maviedailyy · 1,4321 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@rezayathadis · 332 posts𝕭𝖑𝖆𝖈𝖐 𝕯𝖆𝖍𝖑𝖎𝖆
@Black_Dahllia · 1881 postBaHadis
@EnglisHadis · 3,2521 postغَــریـب🌒
@ghaarib14 · 331 postمثلاً روانشناسم!
@HadisPsychologist · 15,7181 postحرمانم!
@Hermaniem · 6661 postmim
@mimism · 8,5221 postروابطعمومیِ سانفرانسیسکو
@SFPublicRelations · 5211 postآچار فرانسه🔧
@Wrench1401 · 3001 postمیم
@zizigolo2 · 2,1641 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@homenumber8 · 19,572
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
@hamidsfg2 · 19,593
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
@thewalkway · 23,255
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
@anjomanposhti · 29,407
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 September 2026
@hamid59salimi · 31,669
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
@AmirHossein_injast · 89,497
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَرد سانفرانسیسکویی” (@In_Search_of_San_Francisco), 18,119 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/In_Search_of_San_Francisco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.