Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@m_ahmadib was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@mahmadi_b held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Growth
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 736–755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 22:21
753
+2
6 Sept 2026, 08:23
751
no change
6 Sept 2026, 07:47
751
+7
16 Aug 2026, 04:37
744
+6
8 Aug 2026, 02:03
738
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:11
738
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
739
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 753 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
40 (7 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
1,705
Reactions total
70
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20
28.6%
👏
16
22.9%
🥰
12
17.1%
👍
11
15.7%
😍
10
14.3%
🔥
1
1.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دو کلمه هم بشنو از پاییز...
«برگهای پاییزی در باد نمیجنگند.
نه میپرسند «چرا باید بیفتم؟»
نه مقاومت میکنند در برابر رقص.
آنها میفهمند که افتادن، بخشی از چرخهی زندگی است که تنها با رها شدن است که زمین بار دیگر زنده میشود.»
قسمتی از پروسه بزرگی مربوط میشود به همین. به همینها که #النا_قربانی میگوید. به بلوغ رهایی، هم رهاکردن، هم رها شدن؛ به اینکه نپرسی «آخه چرا من؟» ایمان بیاوری که هرچه به تو رسید، موهبت است. …
رها کردنِ یه هدف، میتونه نشونهی رشد باشه نه لزوماً شکست. بعضی اهداف مالِ نسخهی قبلیِ ما بودن و دیگه به کارِ این نسخه نمیآن. «تغییرِ مسیر» رو با «تسلیم» اشتباه نگیر.
#موقت است، پست را میگویم
مدیر آبفا میگوید: درپوشهای آهنی فاضلابها را در شهر میدزدند.
رئیس مخابرات میگوید: سیمهای تلفن را در سطح شهر می دزدند.
مدیر ادارهٔ برق می گوید کابلهای برق را در شهر میدزدند.
مدیر گاز میگوید:
فشنگی علمک گاز منازل را در شهر را میدزدند.
شهردار میگوید ابزار و وسایل و تجهیزات ساخت و ساز، لامپها، گلهای میدانها و پلهای آهنی روی جداول را در سطح شهر میدزدند.
پلیس راهور می گوید: …
میگفت:
به نفست قسم...
و راستترین حرفها را میزد
میگفت و مینوشت:
بوس به نفست...
که معنایش میشد:
دوستت دارم
وقتی دور بود مینوشت:
نفس کم آوردهام!
که یعنی دلتنگتم...
نفسش بودم
#محبوبه_احمدی
از مزایای بزرگ شدن هم اینکه حقهایی را که شاید به خودت نمیدادی، حالا به خودت میدهیشان. مثلا برای خودت حق خسته شدن قائل نبودی. باید یکریز کار و تلاش میکردی. اما حالا جاهایی از زندگی، میایستی و میگویی خسته شدم. کافیست. بعد یک چایی خوشرنگ میریزی برای خودت و نفسی میکشی و مینشینی و دیگر به هیچ چیز فکر نمیکنی جز طعم و عطر چای.
#محبوبه_احمدی
@maharathayezendegiiiii
حقیقتی در اعماق درون تو وجود دارد که در انتظار تو نشسته تا آن را کشف کنی،
و آن حقیقت این است: تو لیاقت تمام چیزهای خوبی را که زندگی به تو پیشنهاد میکند، داری.
صبحها که از خواب بلند میشوی برای نور خورشید ، برای زندگی و برای قدرت سپاسگزار باش. برای غذایی که میخوری و لذتی که از زندگی میبری شکرگزار باش.
#راندا_برن
فردا ، برای قدم زدن روی زمین، برای تماشای آفتاب، برای دوست داشتن، برای عشق ورزیدن پروانه ها ، بیدارم کن. حالا میخواهم با شب، همسکوت شوم و به تو فکر کنم.
#محبوبه_احمدی
هربار که یادت میافتم،
«جملهای آشنا، به ذهنم خطور میکند،
در اين سرزمين، چيزی هست
كه ارزش زندگی كردن دارد.»
داخل گیومه را جناب #محمود_درویش میگوید.
...باید چیزی داشت، بهانهای، برای زندگی کردن، دوام آوردن، برای ادامه دادن...
باید جانپناهی داشت اینروزها، دلیلی که ارزش زیستن داشته باشد. من فکر میکنم جانپناه همان بهانهای ست که آدم را برای شروعهای مکرر، سرپا نگه میدارد. هر آدمی لازمش هست که بهانهای داشته باشد که…
امروز شد ده هزار تا ...
دوست داشتنت را می گویم
بعضی چیزها را نمیشود نوشت
آنها را قدم میزنم
مثل همین خیال تو را ...
#محبوبه_احمدی
#پاییزعزیزمان_دارد_میرسد
روز به روز، تعداد «این که ضروری نیست، فعلا نگیرم»هایمان بیشتر میشود! انگار که داریم خودمان را از زندگی حذف میکنیم! چه تلخ و ناعادلانه!
👍4
Signed Ahmadi.B
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @m_ahmadib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آرامش (چهلسالگي)... @chehel_salegi · 31,218 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“یادداشت های م.احمدی” (@m_ahmadib), 753 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_ahmadib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.