Channel
@xuanshangP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,693subscribers
-511 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001729561838 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xuanshangP |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xuanshangP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 2,693 | -346 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 3,039 | -122 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 3,161 | -43 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 3,204 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#最新消息 #波贝 2026年6月15日，柬埔寨联合执法力量对位于卜迭棉芷省波贝市（Poipet）乌佐分区（Ou Chrov）团结胜利村（Samakki Mean Chey）的一栋建筑展开突击检查行动。 行动期间，有新闻媒体记者前往现场拍摄相关画面，但一名执法人员阻止记者进行拍摄。 对此，媒体提出疑问：为何禁止记者拍摄现场情况？ 呼吁有关领导对此事进行调查和关注，并对相关执法行为进行审查。
#菲律宾新闻 假执法真抢劫！菲律宾一团伙专盯华人商铺，已连作案多起 菲律宾新怡诗夏省近期出现一伙假冒执法人员的不法分子，专门针对华人商铺实施敲诈抢劫，引发当地华商高度警惕。 据爆料，这伙人通常以“检查假货”或“中国人无证看店”为借口强行进入店铺，随后封锁出入口、切断监控设备，并直接翻找保险柜和收银台现金。 更恶劣的是，嫌疑人还会以“放人”为条件向店主索要钱财，整个过程形同抢劫。据称，对方既没有执法证件，也无法出示搜查令。 消息称，近一个月来，新怡诗夏省卡巴纳图安市已有五六家华人商店遭遇类似事件，其中包括五金店等华商经营场所。 知情人士透露，该团伙通常驾驶两辆车辆行动，并安排专人在街头踩点，锁定由华人看守的商铺后通知同伙实施作案。 由于部分受害者担心自身签证或经营手续存在问题，不愿报案，也让这伙人变得更加肆无忌惮。 当地华商被提醒，如遇自称政府执法人员上门检查，务必要求对方出示合法证件及搜查令。如无法提供，应立即报警…
#斯里兰卡新闻 斯里兰卡警方成立新部门专门打击网赌电诈 今年已逮捕1000多人，已向中方移交一批涉诈人员 据外媒9日报道，斯里兰卡警方宣布设立新部门专门打击网赌电诈，今年以来已逮捕1000多名嫌犯，大多在首都科伦坡和西部海滨旅游区落网。该新部门正同移民局、央行合作深化治理。 报道指出，随着柬埔寨等国加大对诈骗园区的打击力度，部分犯罪团伙正向斯里兰卡转移，并流向酒店、公寓等隐蔽场所。斯国的免签政策、完善的网络和非正式汇款体系对其具有吸引力。 中国驻斯使馆5月底表示，这属于区域犯罪链条外溢。今年以来，中斯执法部门深化合作，斯方开展多次清查行动，打掉多个涉多国公民的赌诈窝点，并向中方移交了一批中国籍涉诈人员，形成有力震慑。
#柬埔寨新闻 柬埔寨移民总局发声明 柬埔寨移民总局发布声明表示：网站 并非柬埔寨政府认可的合法网站，亦非移民总局运营的、用于咨询进入柬埔寨王国电子签证业务的官方平台。 柬埔寨移民总局再次郑重确认：凡填报入境柬埔寨王国的电子系统，请务必通过官方网站 或 “Cambodia e-Arrival” 应用程序进行。欲获取官方权威信息，请访问移民总局官方网站：www.immigration.gov.kh，或直接拨打热线电话进行咨询：(+855) 78 38 66 99。
#群友爆料 #海悦大酒店 海悦大酒店，不知是哪家的皇家部队这么明目张胆，窗帘都不拉，全部现形出来了，赶紧逃吧。
#老挝新闻 沙湾拿吉省警方捣毁赌博团伙94人并缴获大量犯罪证据 6月10日，沙湾拿吉省警察总部警员与省人民检察院及相关部门合作，对两处地点进行了检查：一处是沙湾拿吉省凯山丰威汉县班蓬沙旺泰村的金通宾馆，另一处是沙湾拿吉省凯山丰威汉县班纳老村的一栋公寓楼。此前，警方接到线报称，该地点涉嫌计算机犯罪活动。 通过调查，当局查获并拘留了94名涉嫌电信诈骗的嫌疑人（诈骗犯），其中包括4名女性，他们来自7个不同的国家：72名中国公民和2名女性，11名印度尼西亚公民和1名女性，3名缅甸公民，4名台湾公民，2名埃塞俄比亚公民，1名柬埔寨公民和1名女性，以及2名老挝公民，同时还缴获了大量电脑和手机。 目前，老挝当局正根据老挝人民民主共和国法律对此案进行调查。
#柬埔寨新闻 近一年西哈努克省打击网络诈骗窝点103处 涉案外国人近5000名 柬埔寨西哈努克省持续加大对跨境网络诈骗犯罪的打击力度。根据当地官方公布的数据，近一年来，执法部门共查处网络诈骗窝点103处，累计发现并控制涉案外国人近5000名，显示当地针对电信网络诈骗产业链的整治行动仍在持续推进。 据了解，西哈努克省一直被认为是柬埔寨网络诈骗案件较为集中的地区之一。此次专项行动中，警方联合移民、司法等多个部门，对涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的园区、公寓及商业场所展开排查，现场查扣电脑、手机等大量涉案设备，并依法对相关人员进行调查处理。 近年来，柬埔寨政府不断加强对网络诈骗犯罪的整治力度，特别是针对跨国犯罪集团开展集中清查行动。公开数据显示，自2025年以来，柬埔寨多地持续开展大规模执法行动，累计关闭数百个涉嫌网络诈骗的窝点，大批外国籍嫌疑人被拘捕或遣返。 与此同时，国际社会也持续关注东南亚地区网络诈骗犯罪及人口贩运问题。有国际机构…
#网友投稿 #刘忍 安徽刘会长已顺利回国，平安落地，勿念～～
#马来西亚新闻 世界杯开赛前，马来西亚警方预告严打非法赌球：下注者、收注庄家、中介和主办方都可能被查 2026年世界杯即将开踢，马来西亚警方宣布，将在赛事期间加强打击非法赌球活动。警方强调，无论是线上赌博、实体下注，还是负责收注、拉客、中介和组织的人员，都将成为执法目标。 据马来西亚媒体报道，武吉阿曼刑事罪案调查局总监拿督 M·古马表示，警方将在世界杯期间展开“OP SOGA XI”专项行动，重点打击与世界杯相关的非法赌球活动。 警方称，执法范围不仅包括传统线下赌博场所，也包括线上赌球平台、社交媒体赌博广告、收注群组和相关宣传渠道。 此次行动将由警方联合马来西亚通讯及多媒体委员会、国家银行等机构展开，重点监督并切断线上非法赌博活动，尤其是社交媒体上的赌球推广和广告。 警方表示，涉及非法赌博活动的人员可能会在多项法律下被调查，包括《1953年住家公开赌博法令》、刑事法典，以及《2001年反洗钱、反恐融资及非法活动收益法令…
#柬埔寨新闻 柬埔寨金边七马卡拉区警方拘捕6名印尼籍人员 涉嫌非法网络赌博 金边讯：柬埔寨金边市七马卡拉区（7 Makara）统一指挥委员会持续对辖区内酒店、旅馆及公寓开展检查行动，发现6名印度尼西亚籍人员及一批相关设备，涉嫌从事非法网络赌博活动。 此次行动于2026年6月10日上午9时30分展开，地点位于金边七马卡拉区Veal Vong分区第9村125号路的Relax旅馆（Relax Guesthouse）。 七马卡拉区区长腾·索图（Theng Sothol）表示，此次执法行动由其亲自率队，在金边初级法院副检察官通·拉塔纳（Tong Ratana）协调下进行，并按照金边市长坤盛（Khuong Sreng）及金边市警察局局长朱恩·纳林（Chhuon Narin）的指示，对辖区内外籍人员住宿场所开展行政检查。 执法人员在检查过程中发现，现场共有6名印度尼西亚籍男性居住，并查获一批电子设备，包括： 1台显示器（Monitor…
#网友投稿 #鸭脖 #开云 #菲律宾 公司活不起了？傻逼助理把我们的鸭脖OA系统改了，不是KJY，外宿补贴就不给。 问管理外宿部门人员，只会说按照规矩办事。最初在KJY的时候，说只是出来避一避，两周就回去，告知只带重要的私人物品，衣服带几件就好。 现在呢？ 内宿人员的行李公司安排带来马尼拉，我们外宿的怎么办？补贴不给，现在又回不去。 最傻逼的是，助理把OA改成什么SSBG，不是KJY的就不给补贴？难道我们的东西不是东西吗？ 最初还发通告说，因为出差会维持3个月的补贴，现在他妈的6月就返岗。再这么说按照规则，是不是应该发完5月的补贴？ 这公司最恶心的地方就是： 问助理，助理不知道。 问薪酬部门，薪酬部门说不知道。 不管什么事情都是装傻。 最搞笑的是，5月1日改的SSBG，然后发外宿补贴通告是5月6号。请问有没有带脑子？还是RZ部门和后勤部门想坑钱？ 最后说一句，各位高层的人看见了麻烦解决。 不然我继续爆全…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 2026世界杯官方指定投注网站 永久网址🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩✨ 实力铸就品牌 🌟🌟🌟🌟 i8国际娱乐平台，集团运作|只做信誉 斥巨资打造全网最顶级的😁😁😁😁线上娱乐平台，树立行业标杆 😁😁😁😁：😃 i8.COM😁😁😁😁实力铸就品牌 😁2026世界杯专属平台✨资金安全保障，赢球更安心！ 😁 尊享老玩家特权，VIP等级1:1继承，专属彩金礼遇已为您准备！ 💖新人扶持😁😁U！💱人气火爆｜全网推荐！ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟代理招商 🌟行业最高永久 😁😁🔤 🌟🌟💵💵 首存送 复存送 投注送 🚗豪车嫩模！ ☄️极速提款秒到账，大额无忧 🪙🪙 热门赛事 · 实时互动 · 多元玩法 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @xuanshangP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,108,157 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝光” (@xuanshangP), 2,693 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xuanshangP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.