This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,380–27,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:53
27,490
+10
14 Aug 2026, 09:38
27,480
+21
13 Aug 2026, 00:04
27,459
+3
12 Aug 2026, 01:33
27,456
-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:04
27,457
+23
9 Aug 2026, 21:32
27,434
+20
9 Aug 2026, 00:52
27,414
+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:31
27,410
+11
6 Aug 2026, 18:43
27,399
+5
6 Aug 2026, 02:03
27,394
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 27,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,340
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
29 (20 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
233,550
Reactions total
3,645
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈382
Videos
≈993
Links
≈1,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 25m
Average length
12m 05s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,594 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,477
41.1%
❤
1,026
28.5%
👍
898
25.0%
😁
81
2.25%
👏
73
2.03%
🤯
17
0.473%
😱
10
0.278%
🥰
8
0.223%
🤔
4
0.111%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Запись эфира с Олегом Степаненко, основателем проекта Система Притяжения.
Олег Степаненко - аспирант Института Мозга Человека им. Бехтеревой, исследует влияние сверхнагрузок на костный мозг и образование стволовых клеток
- врач-остеопат, использует комплексный подход к оздоровлению
• Система Притяжения - психофизическая практика восстановления жизненной силы и раскрытия потенциала через поднятие сверхтяжестей.
См…
Система притяжения
Друзья сегодня вечером в 19.00 смотрите запись эфира с основателем проекта Система Притяжения Олегом Степаненко
Начни изменения с себя — и увидишь, как меняется твоя ВЕТКА РЕАЛЬНОСТИ
Бесплатный онлайн ИНТЕНСИВ Алана Мамиева ⤵️
«ЧЕЛОВЕК БУДУЩЕГО.
Три инструмента новой эпохи»
❓ КОГДА ❓
📌 21,22,23 августа
⏰ 17.00 по Мск
Запись на ИНТЕНСИВ ⤵️
https://t.me/intensiv_Mamiev
✅•ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ• Мараф…
МЫ РОЖАЕМ ДЕТЕЙ, НЕ ПОНИМАЯ, КОГО ПРИВОДИМ В ЭТОТ МИР
Мы привыкли думать, что зачатие — это физиология.
Мужчина, женщина, беременность, роды.
А если это вообще не так?
С Марией Самариной поговорили о том, что происходит ещё до рождения человека: почему одни дети приходят как тяжелейший кармический урок, как женщина «ткёт» судьбу ребёнка, зачем мужчине накапливать энергию перед зачатием и что на самом деле происход…
8 августа 2026 года в Ангарске произошло достаточно знаковое событие для всего шаманского сообщества России — прошли выборы нового Верховного шамана России.
Им стал Артур Цыбиков, с чем я его искренне поздравляю!
На выборы съехались сотни шаманов, хранителей традиций и представителей различных духовных школ со всей Евразии и из стран бывшего СССР. Люди разных народов, культур и древних традиций собрались в одном ме…
🌑 Продолжение ритуала «Отпустить — выбрать — закрепить»
После того как ты отпустила старое — не спеши сразу загадывать новое.
3. Порог
Закрой глаза и проведи 3–5 минут в тишине. Представь пространство между прошлым и будущим. Ничего не проси и не пытайся его заполнить. Просто побудь в этой паузе.
✨ 4. «Я выбираю»
На правой стороне листа запиши 3 состояния или качества, которые выбираешь для своей новой реальности.…
Почему одного логического мышления уже недостаточно?
Мир требует не только умения анализировать, но и способности создавать новое
Логика помогает находить решения
А воображение видеть возможности там, где другие проходят мимо!
Чем гармоничнее мы развиваем разные стороны своего мышления, тем легче адаптируемся к переменам и создаем что-то ценное
Как вы чаще принимаете решения: через логику или интуицию?
Начни изм…
За что идёт борьба ?
Обсудили с Виктором Алексеевичем Ефимовым что определит будущее - военное превосходство, экономика, технологии ?
Или то , какое представление о человеке и обществе станет опеределяющим ?
Ссылки на интервью ⤵️
▶️
YouTube
📱
ВКонтакте
💙
Rutube
Начни изменения с себя — и увидишь, как меняется твоя ВЕТКА РЕАЛЬНОСТИ
Бесплатный онлайн ИНТЕНСИВ Алана Мамиева ⤵️
«ЧЕЛОВЕК БУДУЩЕГО.
Три инструмента …
Что нас ждёт дальше ?
Поговорили с Екатериной Самойловой о том, что сейчас происходит с миром, почему привычная реальность меняется, как отличить ум от разума, зачем человеку возвращаться в естественное состояние и почему будущее зависит не только от внешних событий, но и от нашего внутреннего выбора.
В разговоре поднимаются темы осознанных сновидений, страха смерти, коллективного намерения, перехода от потребления…
ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСТВО ГОТОВЯТ НЕ К ВОЙНЕ, А К НОВОЙ РЕАЛЬНОСТИ
Бояться будущего. Бояться перемен. Бояться потерять. Бояться умереть.
Но что, если именно страх — главная сила, которая удерживает человека в клетке?
В новом выпуске мы со Светланой Драган говорим не только о будущем России и мира. Мы говорим о том, что происходит с каждым из нас прямо сейчас:.
⚡️Почему ближайшие годы станут переломными.
⚡️Зачем миру нужен кри…
Побеждать будут не самые сильные.
ЧЕЛОВЕК БУДУЩЕГО НЕ ЖДЁТ НОВУЮ ЭПОХУ. ОН САМ СТАНОВИТСЯ ЕЁ СОЗДАТЕЛЕМ.
🔥 Бесплатный онлайн-интенсив
«ЧЕЛОВЕК БУДУЩЕГО. Три инструмента новой эпохи»
✅21–23 августа | 17:00 МСК
Приготовься открыть инструменты, которые уже сегодня определяют человека завтрашнего дня.
👇 Вход свободный
https://t.me/intensiv_Mamiev
❕❕❕❕Н А П О М И Н А Ю
🎧 Мои песни доступны для прослушивания на пл…
Депутат Государственной думы, член фракции «Единая Россия» Александр Ильтяков, похоже, невнимательно читал Библию. А если всё-таки читал, то ни фига в ней не понял.
Рассуждая о том, что у женщины якобы «нет самого состояния тела», стоило бы для начала открыть первую главу Книги Бытия:
«И сотворил Бог человека по образу Своему, по образу Божию сотворил его; мужчину и женщину сотворил их».
Бытие 1:27
Точка.
Бог-Тв…
👍79😁44❤26🔥16🤯13👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @probuzdenie17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@probuzdenie17 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 291,923 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Злой эколог @zloyecolog · 111,403 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Хранители и Вершители @alphaingenium · 103,492 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ канал” (@probuzdenie17), 27,490 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probuzdenie17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.