Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net -152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,771–35,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 20:01
34,803
-52
19 Sept 2026, 16:42
34,855
-8
17 Sept 2026, 08:01
34,863
-10
15 Sept 2026, 11:00
34,873
-18
13 Sept 2026, 22:20
34,891
-29
10 Sept 2026, 02:39
34,920
-24
6 Sept 2026, 18:58
34,944
-4
4 Sept 2026, 07:16
34,948
+25
2 Sept 2026, 17:25
34,923
-14
1 Sept 2026, 15:33
34,937
-37
31 Aug 2026, 15:15
34,974
-10
30 Aug 2026, 15:55
34,984
-13
29 Aug 2026, 13:16
34,997
-3
28 Aug 2026, 15:24
35,000
+2
27 Aug 2026, 15:34
34,998
-4
26 Aug 2026, 12:13
35,002
-3
25 Aug 2026, 09:48
35,005
-2
24 Aug 2026, 12:26
35,007
-12
22 Aug 2026, 20:17
35,019
+8
21 Aug 2026, 09:15
35,011
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.73%
avg views ÷ 34,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,040
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
31 (18 June 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
27,360
Reactions total
143
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 18:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈818
Links
≈3,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 49s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,086 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
330
30.4%
😁
237
21.8%
🔥
180
16.6%
💯
148
13.6%
👎
110
10.1%
🤝
81
7.46%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️При банкротстве россиян начали проверять их расходы на такси, рестораны, гаджеты и поездки.
Банки все чаще изучают личные траты должников, чтобы доказать их платежеспособность. Так, в Петербурге суд запросил у сервисов данные о заказах еды, каршеринге и путешествиях банкрота и его супруги. Кредиторы отслеживают даже соцсети: в одном из дел суду предоставили фото техники Apple, дорогих поездок и брекетов должницы. …
ВС пояснил нюансы оспаривания кредитного договора, заключенного под влиянием телефонных мошенников
https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/vs-poyasnil-nyuansy-osparivaniya-kreditnogo-dogovora-zaklyuchennogo-pod-vliyaniem-telefonnykh-moshennikov/
25 августа Верховный Суд вынес Определение по делу № 18-КГ26-59-К4, в котором разъяснено, что суд должен принимать во внимание при рассмотрении дел об оспаривании заключения догово…
Пропал вклад на 14 млн рублей: банк не признал получение денег, но суд поддержал обманутого клиента | Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова | Дзен
https://dzen.ru/a/ap-faQQUCWUL3kwm
⚖️ ИИ приходит в российское судопроизводство
Верховный Суд РФ утвердил Концепцию внедрения технологий искусственного интеллекта в судопроизводство Российской Федерации.
📌 Приказ Верховного Суда РФ от 03.09.2026 № 59-П
Главный принцип концепции — использование возможностей ИИ для повышения эффективности работы судов при сохранении ключевой роли судьи в принятии решений.
Что планируется внедрить?
🔹 Интеллектуальна…
Первый день прошел на ура!!!
✅Разобрали возможности, масштабы и юридическое обоснование реальности бизнеса.
✅Определили значимость, перспективы и направление технологий исцеления будущего
✅Подчеркнули реальность быстрого роста и доходности
Впереди 2-ой день форума 13 СЕНТЯБРЯ | 11:00 МСК
ДЕНЬ КЛИЕНТА
⚠️Подробный разбор технологий и средств для исцеления с нереальными результатами за короткий промежуток времени.
⚠️…
🔥 Приглашаю тебя на онлайн-форум «ДЕНЬГИ • ЭНЕРГИЯ • МАСШТАБ» 🚀
12, 13 и 16 СЕНТЯБРЯ — 3 дня новых идей, возможностей и сильного окружения.
Ты узнаешь:
💰 как сегодня создаются новые источники дохода;
🌿как современные технологии помогают заботиться о здоровье;
🚀 какие возможности открываются для развития и бизнеса.
🎁 Участие бесплатное!
Я думаю, тебе будет интересно посмотреть и взять для себя полезные идеи ✨
Рег…
Онлайн-сервисы по трудовому праву
Сохраните себе этот пост и 26 сервисов по трудовому праву будут доступны вам из одного места и всегда будут оставаться у вас под рукой!
Панель разделена на два раздела - для работодателя и для работника.
Подготовлено командой @sudpraktik_trud
1️⃣Для работодателей
1. Задать вопрос
2. Электронный инспектор
3. Урегулирование разногласий
4. Электронный кадровый документооборот
5. Бан…
60 микрозаймов более чем на 2,5 млн рублей оформили на парикмахера из Казани без её ведома — женщина воюет с коллекторами больше года.
По данным «Базы», сначала Дарье стали звонить незнакомые люди и говорить, что она должна денег их компаниям. Девушка думала, что это мошенники. Но затем неизвестные перешли на её родителей, звонили на работу, угрожали приехать на домашний адрес. Дарья проверила свою кредитную историю…
ВС пояснил нюансы освобождения гражданина-банкрота от исполнения требований кредиторов
https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/vs-poyasnil-nyuansy-osvobozhdeniya-grazhdanina-bankrota-ot-ispolneniya-trebovaniy-kreditorov/
Верховный Суд опубликовал Определение № 301-ЭC26-525(3) от 22 июля по делу № А43-194/2023, в котором пояснил порядок освобождения гражданина-банкрота от исполнения требований банков-кредиторов.
Как указан…
📱 Вирус в телефоне — деньги остаются на месте
С 1 марта 2027 года у банков появится ещё одна официальная причина сказать вашему переводу: «Никуда ты сегодня не поедешь».
Если банк выявит, что на устройство, с которого «Гражданин» пытается отправить деньги, воздействует вредоносная программа, перевод могут не провести.
И это уже не банковская самодеятельность, а требование № 210-ФЗ от 26.06.2026 г.
Новое правило …
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @agent_svobodi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Приключения Правоведов @firstchannelforyou · 20,500 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 September 2026
Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова @sovetiadvokata · 46,921 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Старая🗝️книга @oldlibrary · 48,149 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
ДАЧНИК @dachniikk · 31,103 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Агент свободы | тайный юрист” (@agent_svobodi), 34,803 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agent_svobodi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.