Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РУБАЕВ ☭

Channel

РУБАЕВ ☭

@rubaevCIS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,090subscribers

+268 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001152461749
TypeChannel
Username@rubaevCIS
DescriptionПолитолог Аслан Рубаев По всем вопросам звонить на +7 (919) 104-67-64 Майя
Created5 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rubaevCIS

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bbbreaking/2349344 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC@rubaevCIS/20894 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC1.002 minutes
@bbbreaking/2351687 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC@rubaevCIS/20915 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC1.0072 seconds
@bbbreaking/2352147 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC@rubaevCIS/20926 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC1.004 minutes
@bbbreaking/23606919 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC@rubaevCIS/21018 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC1.0072 seconds
@bbbreaking/23620621 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC@rubaevCIS/21039 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC1.0027 hours
@bbbreaking/23635924 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC@rubaevCIS/21056 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC1.006 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bbbreaking9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@bbbreaking (9–0)
@konfliktworld5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0042 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@lanabadVan8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0047 minutesthis entry (5–3)
@set_partia12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0041 minutesthis entry (9–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 167 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,8128,1017,956.56 August 2026 — 7,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,825 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,824 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,820 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,833 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,825 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,833 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,829 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,812 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,826 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,861 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,956 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,991 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,002 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,007 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,001 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,988 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,972 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,967 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,092 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,101 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,092 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,098 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,090 subscribers8,0906 August 202611 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 97 days, net +268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,769–8,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 14:158,090-8
4 Nov 2026, 18:298,098+6
1 Nov 2026, 22:548,092-9
29 Oct 2026, 20:488,101+9
27 Oct 2026, 03:478,092+125
23 Oct 2026, 19:397,967-5
20 Oct 2026, 12:167,972-16
17 Oct 2026, 04:267,988-13
14 Oct 2026, 11:308,001-6
11 Oct 2026, 02:568,007+5
4 Oct 2026, 20:158,002+11
25 Sept 2026, 13:207,991+35
17 Sept 2026, 06:557,956+95
13 Sept 2026, 02:377,861+35
9 Sept 2026, 05:147,826+14
31 Aug 2026, 14:067,812-17
28 Aug 2026, 06:247,829-4
24 Aug 2026, 20:587,833+8
21 Aug 2026, 03:327,825-8
17 Aug 2026, 22:127,833first reading

Engagement

223 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 8,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,110
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 223 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held223 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total214,437
Reactions total4,229
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,030
Videos
≈3,110
Links
≈3,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28m 21s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,764 reactions across 210 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,32415.7%
🤡2,26515.3%
🤬1,58110.7%
🤣1,52310.3%
👍1,0827.33%
custom 52471949474838869737244.90%
😡6574.45%
🔥6554.44%
❤6434.36%
😁5253.56%
😢5143.48%
🤔4943.35%
🙏3872.62%
🤯3012.04%
⚡2901.96%
😱2131.44%
👎1941.31%
😈1100.745%
🤨690.467%
👌660.447%
8 further kinds1470.996%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 223 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,612 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 223 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rubaevCIS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 223 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 69 posts held from the last 30 days (2.90%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 20:56 UTC407 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚡️В Дублине началась встреча Уиткоффа и Кушнера с Зеленским, — украинские СМИ.

🤔8👏2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,260 views57 reactionsread 13 November 2026

❗️Бомба для подрыва полковника прилетела на воздушном шаре со стороны Прибалтики — СМИ По предварительным данным, СВУ перенаправили на территорию Ленобласти при помощи воздушного шара. Неизвестный подобрал «посылку» и в назначенное время в нужном месте сделал закладку для исполнителя Также стало известно, что сам подрывник после Турции направился в Кишинев, откуда не осуществляется выдача подозреваемых российской с…

🤬49🤣4🔥2🤡1😁1

12 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,270 views69 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Этих лечить только крепостным правом и дореволюционным алфавитом, пусть по нему и пишут

💯48👍11🤡7❤2🤣1

12 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,370 views53 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Первые кадры с места подрыва автомобиля полковника в Питере СК подтвердил гибель военного. Возбуждено уголовное дело об убийстве

🤬38🙏8😢5🔥2

12 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,360 views57 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

❗️❗️Автомобиль с военнослужащим взорвался в Санкт-Петербурге — СМИ По предварительным данным в Шушарах на Колпинском шоссе погиб полковник. Рядом с ним находился член семьи, он выжил, но получил ранения В машине военный находился один Взрывчатку прикрепили к днищу машины полковника и подорвали дистанционно, когда он выезжал из двора В том же микрорайоне в конце августа погиб подполковник 6-й армии ВВС и ПВО Серге…

😢31🤬19🔥2🤔2❤1😁1🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC≈1,310 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Каждая пядь нашей земли будет России возвращена "Что будет" с Иваном Панкиным (@Pankin_Ivan) на радио "Комсомольская правда". Подключайтесь к трансляции ВКонтакте или на Rutube. Слушайте в прямом эфире Радио "КП" или смотрите в Telegram в 08:00 МСК.

👎8🔥3⚡2💔2👍1🤡1

12 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC≈1,290 views46 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚡️Уиткофф и Кушнер прибыли в Россию и уже едут в сторону Кремля После трехсторонних переговоров у них состоится личная встреча с Путиным Они расскажут об итогах встречи в Абу-Даби. Возможно уже сегодня нас ждет мир

🤣39🤔4custom 52471949474838869732🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,440 views45 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Кому интересно Завтра в 8:45 буду в прямом эфире на радио «Комсомольская правда»

👍34❤7👎3🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,440 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @Pankin_Ivan

Переговоры в Абу-Даби в этот раз - полный провал. Абсолютный. Сравнимый, разве что, с известным провалом в Стамбуле в 2022-м. Или даже хуже, с учётом что целых пять лет прошло с тех пор. Была, конечно, ещё встреча сразу после атаки на стратеги. Она тоже в известной степени считалась безрезультатной, да и ещё и имиджево проигрышной. Но сейчас обстоятельства совсем для Киева другие, но на уступки они не идут. Потому чт…

💯31🤨16❤2🤡2

11 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,570 views50 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚡️У нас есть хороший импульс для того, чтобы найти решение до Нового года, — член украинской делегации на переговорах в Абу-Даби Арахамия.

🤡34🤨13😡3

11 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,610 views71 reactionsread 13 November 2026

❗️Итоги переговоров России, США и Украины в Абу-Даби: – Речи о договорняке пока нет и близко. Единственное конкретное решение на данный момент — масштабный обмен пленными, подробности которого раскроют позже – Спецпосланники Трампа отправятся завтра в Москву для встречи с Путиным, а затем могут поехать на Украину для общения с Зеленским – Замминистра иностранных дел Сергей Рябков заявил, что по итогам встреч в Абу…

🤣46🤡12😡9❤3⚡1

11 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC≈1,630 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚡️Трёхсторонние переговоры между Россией, США и Украиной в Абу-Даби продолжатся сегодня в 11:00 МСК, — СМИ.

🤡15🤔7🙏2⚡1❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @rubaevCIS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Borisenko Dmitriy
@borisenkoD · 111,537
7 posts
Русский декаданс
@beregofic · 36,367
5 posts
Донбасский Кейс
@donbasscase · 53,609
5 posts
Пятилетка
@pyatiletka111 · 50,314
5 posts
Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков"
@AlanMamiati · 62,169
4 posts
Романов Владимир | Северный поток 3
@potokseverniy · 27,820
4 posts
Максим Шевцов информационный проект #сетевая_партия. Добрая поддержка 2202 2053 4970 7429 "Сбер"
@set_partia · 10,975
4 posts
Лев Вершинин
@putnik1lv · 42,110
3 posts
Павел Иванов | Аудио статьи
@a_articles · 108,770
2 posts
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА
@arx_spn · 1,018,125
2 posts
Компромат СНГ
@CompromatSNG · 49,261
2 posts
Наивная политология
@greyshemes · 6,538
2 posts
Работает Альфа
@alphanewsam · 13,734
1 post
Бери шинель
@berishinel · 28,459
1 post
Национальная премия «СВОИМ»
@centrsvoim · 100
1 post
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,719
1 post
kavkaz_leakbez
@kavkaz_leakbez · 30,975
1 post
Шамиль Хадулаев
@KhadulaevShamil · 12,801
1 post
Марина Масленникова
@mamaslennikova · 30,064
1 post
ВСЕ В ПОРЯДКЕ - ПАДАЕМ
@MilaRostova14 · 494
1 post
Novostyan
@novostyan · 560
1 post
Ольга Четверикова | Официальный канал
@ONCHETVERIKOVA · 31,385
1 post
Yerevan․Today Rus
@rusyerevantoday · 8,479
1 post
ЛИ́НДРЕ
@y_lindre · 5,753
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков"
@AlanMamiati · 62,169
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Спец
@spetstv · 21,558
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
ПРОБУЖДЕНИЕ канал
@probuzdenie17 · 27,938
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Павел Иванов | Аудио статьи
@a_articles · 108,770
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Алан Мамиев ИНТЕНСИВ
@intensiv_Mamiev · 30,378
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Перехват управления
@logikadysha · 36,957
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
ПАНКИН
@Pankin_Ivan · 23,559
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
СВОБОДНОЕ ДЫХАНИЕ -- ☢ЯДрёна WatchЬ‼️
@shingarkin · 24,435
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РУБАЕВ ☭” (@rubaevCIS), 8,090 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rubaevCIS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.