😃😃 足球/电竞/𝐍𝐁𝐀红单:💸💸💸💸 🔢🔢 法甲 马赛 𝐯𝐬 斯特拉斯堡🧧 🔢🔢 西乙 科尔多瓦 𝐯𝐬 赫罗纳 🔢🔢 英超 阿森纳 𝐯𝐬 考文垂🧧 🔢🔢 𝐋𝐏𝐋 西安𝐖𝐄 𝐯𝐬 𝐋𝐆𝐃 🔢🔢 𝐋𝐏𝐋 深圳𝐍𝐈𝐏 𝐯𝐬 𝐈𝐆 🔢🔢 𝐋𝐏𝐋 北京𝐉𝐃𝐆 𝐯𝐬 𝐓𝐄𝐒 🔢🔢 中超 成都蓉城 𝐯𝐬 上海申花 🔢🔢 英超 伊普斯维奇 𝐯𝐬 桑德兰 🔢🔢 西甲 毕尔巴鄂竞技 𝐯𝐬 塞维利亚 🔢🔢 法甲 朗斯 𝐯𝐬 欧塞尔 ✅点击跳转查看✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ——————————————————⭐ 🫥𝟏. 免费加盟代理佣金𝟓𝟓% 🫥𝟐. 月新增奖励最低𝟔𝟎𝟎元/人 🫥𝟑. 限时周人头费最低𝟑𝟎𝟎元/人 🫥𝟒. 月均日活奖励最高𝟑𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖 🫥𝟓. 五大联赛冠军盘投注返利最高𝟏𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖 ——————————————————⚡ 👍𝟏. 注册绑定送𝟏𝟎𝟎元 👍𝟐. 首存享 𝟔𝟖%加赠 | 最高送𝟖𝟖𝟖元 👍𝟑. 五大联赛冠军盘免单𝟓𝟔𝟎𝟎𝟎元 👍𝟒.

Channel
❤️ 足球红单|𝐊𝐀𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐍|𝐉𝐈𝐔𝐘𝐎𝐔|世界杯|赛事推荐
@TiYu2828
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,253subscribers
-1,732 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001438491608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TiYu2828 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TiYu2828 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 7,253 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 7,288 | -689 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 7,977 | -76 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 8,053 | -588 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 8,641 | -341 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 8,982 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 8,985 | first reading |
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.17%
- avg views ÷ 7,253 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 157
- 154 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.25%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 158
- of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 154 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 158 (7 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,238 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 03s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😁😀😄「𝐓𝐈𝟏𝟓投注返利每日𝟔𝟎𝟎𝟎元」 活动彩金:𝟓倍流水 活动时间:0⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣➖0⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 🖥活动内容 ▶️ 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔年𝐃𝐎𝐓𝐀𝟐国际邀请赛(𝐓𝐈𝟏𝟓)再次来到中国上海!𝐗𝐆、𝐓𝐑、𝐕𝐆三支中国战队主场作战! ▶️ 活动期间,当日在开云电竞场馆、𝐃𝐁电竞场馆、电竞牛场馆内投注「𝐃𝐎𝐓𝐀𝟐 𝐓𝐈𝟏𝟓国际邀请赛」赛事有效投注额≥𝟑,𝟎𝟎𝟎元,点击【立 即申请】按钮即可获得最高𝟔,𝟎𝟎𝟎元助威彩金! ▶️ 新手专享加赠:活动期间当日注册的新会员,可额外获得最高𝟑𝟎%助威彩金加赠! ▶️ 若同一支战队,累计应援次数≥𝟑次,还可获得对应战队应援彩金!
0⃣【开云-8月22日 23点15分 法甲 朗斯 vs 欧塞尔】 数据初盘开出全场让球:朗斯-1,机构倾向主队优势。法国甲级联赛第1轮,主队早前法超杯1-0击败巴黎圣日耳曼夺冠,球队防守稳固,传控能力强,配合默契,韧性十足,士气大振。客队近五场友谊赛2胜2平1负状态平平,整体表现未如理想。两队近十场交锋朗斯7胜2平1负占优,近两场对绩更获全胜,实力相对更强,另加主场之利,综合分析本场看好主队获胜。 全场让球:朗斯[email protected] 全场大小:小[email protected] 推荐比分:2-0
0⃣【开云-8月22日23点整 西甲 毕尔巴鄂竞技 vs 塞维利亚】 数据方面机构对于主队实力给予肯定,盘口开出主队让0.5/1球。毕尔巴鄂竞技整体运转高效,攻防转换节奏鲜明,主场作战时具备较强的控制力与执行力。塞维利亚新赛季首战告捷,球队士气得到明显提升,进攻端也展现出一定威胁。不过面对整体配合更加成熟的毕尔巴鄂竞技,客队此番作客仍将承受较大压力。综合来看,主队整体体系更为稳定,主场优势也较为明显,本场看好毕尔巴鄂竞技力克塞维利亚。 全场让球:毕尔巴鄂竞技-0.5/[email protected] 全场大小:小2/[email protected] 推荐比分:1-0
❤1
0⃣【开云-8月22日 22点整 英超 伊普斯维奇 vs 桑德兰】 数据初盘开出全场让球平手盘,机构倾向两队均势。英格兰超级联赛第1轮,主队近期斩获四连胜,球队前场把握进球能力有明显提升,表现相当出色,状态火热,愈战愈勇。客队斩获三连胜,球队防守稳固,近期表现出色,状态回暖。两队近十场交锋4胜2平4负形成均势,双方近两场在英冠对绩伊普斯维奇均获胜,整体实力相对较强,另加主场优势,综合分析本场看好主队拿下新赛季首胜。 全场让球:伊普斯维奇[email protected] 全场大小:小[email protected] 推荐比分:1-0
0⃣【开云-8月22日19点35分 中超 成都蓉城 vs 上海申花】 数据方面机构对于主队实力给予认可,盘口开出主队让0.5球。成都蓉城本赛季表现强势,长期高居积分榜首,整体状态与攻防发挥均十分稳定,尤其主场作战气势十足,具备较强的争胜能力。反观上海申花上轮联赛主场0比3惨遭北京国安击败,攻防两端全面失守,球队士气难免受到打击。此役面对状态正佳的成都蓉城,申花后防仍将面临较大考验。综合来看,主队整体实力与近期状态更值得信赖,本场看好成都蓉城主场取胜。 全场让球:成都蓉城[email protected] 全场大小:小3/[email protected] 推荐比分:2-1
0⃣【开云-8月22日 19点整 LPL 北京JDG vs TES】 数据初盘开出全局获胜:北京[email protected]/[email protected],说明机构更倾向于TES的优势。TES目前以9胜3负、+9净胜分位列登峰组第3位,三路线权与前期对线压制力极强;北京JDG则以5胜6负、-1净胜分暂居第5位,中期运营拉扯表现稳健,但前期节奏偶尔陷入被动。在大局往绩上,TES近期交手优势非常显著,不仅在8月2日的直接对话中以2-0横扫JDG,近期对战更是屡屡克制对手。并且TES英雄池储备与阵容容错率更具优势,综合分析本场看好TES凭借顶尖的个人实力与战术压制击败北京JDG。 首局一血:[email protected] 首局击杀让分:[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小:大[email protected]
0⃣【开云-8月22日 17点整 LPL 深圳NIP vs IG】 数据初盘开出全局获胜:深圳[email protected]/[email protected],说明机构更倾向于IG的优势。深圳NIP目前以5胜0负、+7净胜分豪取全胜高居涅槃组榜首,全队状态火热且前期节奏把控极佳;IG则以4胜1负、+5净胜分紧随其后位列第2位,战术风格激进且具备出色的团战爆发力。大局往绩方面,两队历史交手互有胜负,但深圳NIP在最近一次对战中以2-1力克IG,心理上略占微弱优势。并且深圳NIP的阵容体系更显扎实稳定,综合分析本场看好深圳NIP击败IG。 首局一血:[email protected] 首局击杀让分:[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小:大[email protected]
0⃣【开云-8月22日 15点整 LPL 西安WE vs LGD】 数据初盘开出全局获胜:西安[email protected]/[email protected],机构更倾向于西安WE的优势。西安WE目前以6胜6负暂居登峰组第4位,近期战术执行力稳健,运营决策越发成熟;LGD则以4胜7负位列第6位,队伍具备强烈的黑马属性与团战爆发力。在大局往绩方面,西安WE在LPL联赛交锋中对LGD保持着极高的胜率,并在最近一次对局中以2-0完胜LGD,大局对位心理优势显著。并且WE阵容体系更趋稳定,综合分析本场看好西安WE战胜LGD。 首局一血:西安[email protected] 首局击杀让分:西安[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小:小[email protected]
0⃣【开云-8月22日 3点整 英超 阿森纳 vs 考文垂】 (本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知!) 数据方面机构开出主队让2,给予实力的绝对认可。阿森纳与考文垂历史交锋中,阿森纳近10场取得8胜1平1负,整体优势十分明显,面对对手具备较强心理优势。阿森纳近年来保持英超顶级竞争力,球队阵容深度、进攻质量以及主场控制力均处于较高水平,酋长球场的比赛压制力尤为突出。考文垂虽然近年来提升明显,但面对豪门球队时防守压力较大,客场抗衡能力仍需考验。结合双方历史交锋、球队实力以及主场优势来看,阿森纳有望掌控比赛节奏。综合分析,本场更看好阿森纳主场取胜。 全场让球:阿森纳[email protected] 全场大小:大[email protected] 推荐比分:4-1
0⃣【开云-8月22日 3点整 西乙 科尔多瓦 vs 赫罗纳】 数据方面机构开出客队让0/0.5,给予实力的认可。科尔多瓦与赫罗纳历史交锋中,科尔多瓦近10场取得7胜3负,往绩方面占据明显优势。近期状态来看,科尔多瓦近10场取得2胜4平4负,整体表现有所起伏;赫罗纳近10场取得1胜6平3负,虽然不败率较高,但取胜能力不足。科尔多瓦本场坐镇主场,熟悉的比赛环境有助于提升球队发挥,同时历史交锋优势也能带来一定信心。赫罗纳客场作战稳定性尚可,但面对科尔多瓦时心理层面处于劣势。综合分析,本场更看好科尔多瓦主场取胜。 全场让球:科尔多瓦+0/[email protected] 全场大小:小2/[email protected] 推荐比分:1-0
0⃣【开云-8月22日 2点45分 法甲 马赛 vs 斯特拉斯堡】 (本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知!) 数据初盘开出全场让球:马赛-0.5/1,机构倾向主队优势。法国甲级联赛揭幕战,主队近六场友谊赛4胜2负,球队前场把握能力强,球员体能较佳,状态良好,整体表现相对稳定。客队近八场友谊赛1平7负未尝胜绩,球队防守薄弱,表现甚差,状态持续低迷。两队近十场交锋马赛3胜6平1负占优,近年整体实力略胜一筹,另加主场之利,综合分析本场看好主队拿下新赛季开门红。 全场让球:马赛-0.5/[email protected] 全场大小:大[email protected] 推荐比分:3-1
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @TiYu2828. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 42,996 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️ 足球红单|𝐊𝐀𝐈𝐘𝐔𝐍|𝐉𝐈𝐔𝐘𝐎𝐔|世界杯|赛事推荐” (@TiYu2828), 7,253 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TiYu2828.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.