交盘,交付稳定的可以支持小金额做起,

Channel
协议球,比赛内幕,蛇货
@xieyiqiu66
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,150subscribers
+938 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001505254436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xieyiqiu66 |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xieyiqiu66 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 15,150 | -97 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 15,247 | -78 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 15,325 | -134 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 15,459 | -161 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 15,620 | -200 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 15,820 | -119 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 15,939 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:13 | 15,970 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:43 | 15,987 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 16,012 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 16,027 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 16,036 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 16,047 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 16,055 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 16,061 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 16,072 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 16,076 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 16,088 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 16,098 | +9,494 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 6,604 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 15,150 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,560
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 33,290 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 32s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
今天有赛
这里合作场场清,说的周一交付完毕是说号主自己和庄交付完可以开工了,不是指和本工作室交付完。
周一交付完毕的联系管理开工,有安排
有赛事安排,能开工联系管理 @a1805975826
收平博
合作需要联系管理
有皇冠好资源想打拉赛的联系管理,可以拉一个球左右的盘口优势。比如大2.75的盘口,可以让盘口变成大2再往里打,有特定优势,而且透明。
今晚有两场比赛,开工时间比较接近,资源只能开工一场的可以给个口
如果有小白要合作的,直接联系管理的时候说明是小白就可以了,不然有些说得太专业也听不懂: 半吊子不要装成行家,增加沟通成本
最近较忙,有合作需要直接留言
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @xieyiqiu66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chuhuo8888 · 51,492
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
@mltytxdy · 54,731
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@ybtytd · 157,878
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@JNTY999 · 58,659
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@tiyuquan · 101,943
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“协议球,比赛内幕,蛇货” (@xieyiqiu66), 15,150 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xieyiqiu66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.