⚽️🏀8-29初盘战绩⚔️ 1红 0走水 3黑 8月总计 😁收米35 😐走水3 😭挂逼48
❤5👍2

Channel
@daqiugou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
380subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002107376014 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daqiugou |
| Description | 💬💬每日精选推送💬💬 竞彩|体育 |推单 |六合彩 | 篮球 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daqiugou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 380 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 380 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
17 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 70.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 29.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2024 to 30 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚽️🏀8-29初盘战绩⚔️ 1红 0走水 3黑 8月总计 😁收米35 😐走水3 😭挂逼48
❤5👍2
—-19:00*泰国甲级联赛—- 赫恩柯恩联 vs 武里南联 让球 (香港盘) 武里南联 (-2) @ 0.91 —-01:00*西班牙甲级联赛—— 赫罗纳 vs 奥萨苏纳 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (2.5) @ 1.00 —--02:00*沙特阿拉伯职业联赛—— 吉达联合 vs 布赖代合作 让球 (香港盘) 布赖代合作 (+0.5/1) @ 1.04 —--03:30*西班牙甲级联赛—— 拉斯帕尔马斯 vs 皇家马德里 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (3) @ 0.95
⚽️🏀8-28初盘战绩⚔️ 3红 0走水 2黑 8月总计 😁收米34 😐走水3 😭挂逼45
👍1
——17:30*澳大利亚杯—— 新南威尔士 vs 墨尔本胜利 让球 (香港盘) 新南威尔士 (+2/2.5) @ 0.84 —-18:30*韩国足总杯—— 浦项制铁 vs 济州联队 让球 (香港盘) 浦项制铁 (-0.5) @ 0.97 —-23:45*沙特阿拉伯职业联赛—— 伊地法格 vs 阿科多 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (2.5/3) @ 0.94 ——01:00*西班牙甲级联赛—— 毕尔巴鄂竞技 vs 瓦伦西亚 让球 (香港盘) 毕尔巴鄂竞技 (-0.5/1) @ 0.86 03:30/ 马德里竞技 vs 西班牙人 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (2.5/3) @ 1.00
⚽️🏀8-28初盘战绩⚔️ 4红 0走水 1黑 8月总计 😁收米31 😐走水3 😭挂逼43
👍1
—--17:30*澳大利亚杯—— 昆士兰狮 vs 西悉尼流浪者 让球 (香港盘) 西悉尼流浪者 (-1) @ 0.88 18;30/奥林匹克秦斯维 vs 阿德莱德联 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (4) @ 1.01 —-01:00*西班牙甲级联赛—- 马洛卡 vs 塞维利亚 让球 (香港盘) 马洛卡 (-0/0.5) @ 1.08 —--02:00*沙特阿拉伯职业联赛—— 费哈 vs 利雅得胜利 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (3.5/4) @ 0.90 ——-03:30*西班牙甲级联赛—— 巴列卡诺 vs 巴塞罗那 让球 (香港盘) 巴塞罗那 (-0.5/1) @ 0.86
⚽️🏀8-27初盘战绩⚔️ 2红 0走水 2黑 8月总计 😁收米27 😐走水3 😭挂逼42
👍1
—-18:30*韩国乙级联赛—- 天安城 vs 安山小绿人 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (2.5) @ 1.05 ——00:30*意大利甲级联赛—— 卡利亚里 vs 科莫 让球 (香港盘) 卡利亚里 (-0/0.5) @ 1.02 02:45*维罗纳 vs 尤文图斯 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (2/2.5) @ 0.99 ——-03:30*西班牙甲级联赛—— 比利亚雷亚尔 vs 维戈塞尔塔 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (2.5/3) @ 1.04
👍1
⚽️🏀8-25初盘战绩⚔️ 2红 0走水 3黑 8月总计 😁收米25 😐走水3 😭挂逼40 黑单推荐
👍1
—-17:00*日本职业甲级联赛—- 广岛三箭 vs 柏太阳神 让球 (香港盘) 广岛三箭 (-0.5/1) @ 0.82 —-18:00*日本职业甲级联赛—- 神户胜利船 vs 鸟栖砂岩 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (3) @ 0.98 —-21:00*英格兰超级联赛—- 狼队 vs 切尔西 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (3) @ 0.92 —-21:30*德国甲级联赛—- 沃尔夫斯堡 vs 拜仁慕尼黑 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (3/3.5) @ 0.94 —-23:30*英格兰超级联赛—- 利物浦 vs 布伦特福德 让球 (香港盘) 利物浦 (-1.5/2) @ 0.83
⚽️🏀8-23初盘战绩⚔️ 1红 1走水 2黑 8月总计 😁收米23 😐走水3 😭挂逼37 反我发财
👍1
下海推荐 —--00:30*德国乙级联赛—- 汉诺威96 vs 汉堡 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (3) @ 1.03 —-01:00*西班牙甲级联赛—- 维戈塞尔塔 vs 瓦伦西亚 大/小 (香港盘) 小 (2/2.5) @ 1.03 ——02:30*德国甲级联赛—— 门兴格拉德巴赫 vs 勒沃库森 让球 (香港盘) 门兴格拉德巴赫 (+1) @ 1.00 ——03:30*西班牙甲级联赛—— 塞维利亚 vs 比利亚雷亚尔 大/小 (香港盘) 大 (2.5/3) @ 0.96
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daqiugou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 564,147 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大球狗🐶-足球推荐日记” (@daqiugou), 380 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daqiugou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.