💻稳定盈利,昨晚又收 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️12.00,友谊赛,俄罗斯🇷🇺-0.5/1,全场2-0伊朗,打穿赢全 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🎉181❤170👍167🔥159

Channel
@zuqiu8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,908subscribers
+248 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491328771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zuqiu8 |
| Description | 一手协议足球,体育,包赢,电竞假赛! 赛后盈利55分👾最低5000起投,大额可以面交。‼️首次合作先去看频道置顶消息的合作说明 ⚽️不中包赔全额,合作伙伴共赢!👺唯一联系方式@yc12149 ✅收U地址: TU2ijS4WTJHGrAAR923hu6qi6u88888888 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zuqiu8 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 35,908 | -109 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 36,017 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 36,034 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 36,046 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 36,059 | -70 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 36,129 | -61 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 36,190 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 36,200 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 36,211 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:24 | 36,235 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 36,231 | +144 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 36,087 | -61 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 36,148 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 36,143 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 36,135 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 36,130 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 36,115 | +145 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 35,970 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 35,977 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 35,968 | first reading |
93 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 93 (23 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 45,808 |
| Reactions total | 24,174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 04:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69,717 reactions across 85 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15,331 | 22.0% | |
| 🎉 | 15,318 | 22.0% | |
| 👍 | 15,184 | 21.8% | |
| ❤ | 15,170 | 21.8% | |
| 🤩 | 4,388 | 6.29% | |
| 🥰 | 4,326 | 6.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69,717 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💻稳定盈利,昨晚又收 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️12.00,友谊赛,俄罗斯🇷🇺-0.5/1,全场2-0伊朗,打穿赢全 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🎉181❤170👍167🔥159
💻出单,在线的合作伙伴可以私信拿单了 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
❤144🔥140👍128🎉117
💻昨晚继续收,就搞了一单欧国联 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️2.45,法国🇫🇷-0.5,全场1-0拿下比利时🇧🇪 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
❤180🔥180🎉170👍163
💻开工了,在线的合作伙伴私信上车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🔥186👍183❤174🎉174
💻昨天晚场的初盘也收 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️4.00,阿根廷杯,小保加-0.5,全场3-2竞赛会 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🔥186👍176🎉174❤168
💻欧国联的角球先收一单 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️立陶宛🇱🇹vs阿塞拜疆🇦🇿,小5角,全场就2个角 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🎉198🔥185❤179👍163
💻晚场足球出单,在线的合作伙伴可以私信拿单上车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🔥227❤201🎉200👍185
💻早上的美职业大联盟收3场 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️皇家盐城湖小3.5/4,全场3-0新英格兰革命 ✔️休斯顿迪纳摩小2/2.5,全场0-2堪萨斯城体育 ✔️达拉斯小2,全场1-0洛杉矶 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🔥195👍181🎉158❤154
💻2.00的亚运男足搞一下,在线的合作伙伴私信我拿单 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
👍182❤177🔥175🎉172
💻晚场开工,欧国联出单,合作伙伴速度私信我上车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
🎉181🔥176👍175❤167
💻轻松拿下篮球 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️亚运会女足,韩国🇰🇷➕13.5分,直接85-80拿下中国,赢都赢不了,受让稳如捡钱 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻开工,下午3点的篮球,在线的合作伙伴私信我拿单 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
👍189🎉179🔥174❤169
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @zuqiu8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“足球❤协议球❤️一手资源🥇包赢” (@zuqiu8), 35,908 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zuqiu8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.