Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

doreamer의 투자 충전소⛽

@doreamer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,476subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001542583813
TypeChannel
Username@doreamer
Created30 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doreamer

Growth

2,4762,4782,4777 August 2026 — 2,478 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,478 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,476 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,476–2,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:172,476-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:502,477-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:012,478no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:532,478first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 2,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
352
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,044
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC178 viewsread 7 August 2026

일론 머스크 7/23 이코노미스트 인터뷰 정리 - jian 시간 되면 아래 유튜브 원본 영상 보며 분위기 직접 느껴도 좋을듯 https://m.blog.naver.com/mech05/224369225850 https://youtu.be/XuoqKYxDHVc

5 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC207 viewsread 7 August 2026

널뛰기 인증된 리튬 가격을 고정가에 납품 요구 “국방물류국은 공급업체에 향후 5년간 적용할 탄산리튬 납품가격을 고정해 제시하도록 요구했다.” https://www.theguru.co.kr/mobile/article.html?no=105364

4 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC246 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

중국 휴머노이드 로봇 분해도 유니트리 G1 1800만원/대 https://v.daum.net/v/20260729163938585

3 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC308 viewsread 7 August 2026

“내놔” https://n.news.naver.com/article/032/0003462041

3 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC283 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

2026년 세제개편안 https://mofe.go.kr/nw/nes/detailNesDtaView.do?searchBbsId1=MOSFBBS_000000000028&searchNttId1=MOSF_000000000078809&menuNo=4010100

3 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC109 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samsung_Global_AI_SW

레오폴드 아셴브레너의 투자자 서한 파트너 여러분께, 이번 달 저희는 여러분의 기대에 미치지 못했습니다. 저희는 결코 발생해서는 안 될 수준의 영구적인 자본 손실 위험에 매우 가까이 다가갔습니다. 결과적으로는 투자자 여러분과 펀드를 보호할 수 있는 해결책을 마련했지만, 저희가 펀드를 운용하는 원칙은 애초에 그런 상황 자체를 만들지 않는 것입니다. 변동성은 장기 투자 수익을 얻기 위해 치러야 하는 대가입니다. 지난 2년 동안 저희는 간헐적인 큰 조정을 겪으면서도 뛰어난 성과를 거두었습니다. 하지만 펀드는 언제나 큰 손실을 감내한 뒤에도 다시 일어설 수 있는 구조여야 합니다. 이번 일을 통해 반드시 필요한 교훈을 얻고, 이를 조직에 반영하는 것을 제 가장 중요한 과제로 삼겠습니다. 현재 상황을 말씀드리겠습니다. 7월 한 달 동안 포트폴리오는 큰

3 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC145 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hedgehara

LTCM은 애초에 레버리지가 300배도 갔을걸요

3 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC142 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wallstbearcup

ㄴ LTCM은 처음 채권 차익매매만 하였지만, 알파가 희석되자 M&A Arbitrage 등 전문성과 떨어지는 매매를 하였습니다. 그리고 러시아 금융위기를 맞고 한방에 무너졌습니다. 그리고 개인적으로는 익스포져 규모나 네트워크 측면을 볼 때 LTCM과 비교하기엔 무리가 있지 않나 싶습니다. 그 정도였으면 시타델 정도에서 끝나진 않았을 겁니다.

3 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

시추에이션 어웨어니스와 LTCM의 공통점 1. SA와 LTCM의 3가지 핵심 공통점 ① 고레버리지를 활용한 베팅 SA: 4배 레버리지로 'AI Capex 롱 + 소프트웨어 숏' 포트폴리오 구축 LTCM: 30배 이상 레버리지로 FICC 시장 롱숏 포트폴리오 구축 ② 손실 공개 후 '포식자 매매' 피해 발생 상황 악화 후 자본 조달을 위해 투자자 서한을 발송했으나, 이 사실이 알려지며 시장의 공격 대상이 됨 LTCM: 서한 발송(1998.09.01) 후 공매도했던 미국 국채가 한 달 내내 급등 SA: 서한 발송(2026.07.24) 후 필라델피아 반도체 지수가 4거래일간 15% 폭락 ③ 외부 주체의 포트폴리오 인수로 청산 위험 종식 LTCM: 1998년 9월 23일, 투자자 컨소시엄이 포트폴리오 인수 SA: 2026년 7월 30일, 시타

3 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026

Margin Call : Situational Awareness - 뉴욕주민 https://youtu.be/kmxy8bUAyJA

31 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC277 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @knowledge_to_wealth

오늘의 교훈. IQ나 전략의 싸움이 아니다. 투자는 태도다. 📉 레오폴드 아셴브레너 몰락 — 시타델이 통째로 받아간 24시간 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1. 2001년생 독일 출신, OpenAI 슈퍼얼라인먼트 팀 소속이었으나 2024년 4월 해고됨. 직후 165페이지 에세이 『Situational Awareness』로 "AGI 인프라 병목" 논지를 퍼뜨림. 2. 2024년 말 시드 2.25억 달러로 동명의 헤지펀드 출범. AI 물리·디지털 인프라 극단적 롱 + 밸류에이션 과열된 반도체 풋 헤지가 전략의 뼈대였음. 3. 코어위브·IREN·코어사이언티픽·어플라이드디지털·블룸에너지·SK하이닉스·라이엇·클린스파크 등을 담아 설정 이후 누적 1,000% 이상, 2026년 상반기에만 순수익률 439%를 기록함. AUM은 200억 달러

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doreamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“doreamer의 투자 충전소⛽” (@doreamer), 2,476 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doreamer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.