La protéine Spike et les vaccins qui y sont associés sont mortels... Obscures piqûres, juin 2021, pour ne jamais oublier !! Un très bon travail d'investigation de @RenardBute sur le fonctionnement de la protéine Spike. Points par points, il avait décrypté son évolution, ses répercussions, et comment la vaccination allait affecté notre système immunitaire. Il a levé le voile sur ces "obscures piqûres"... https://t.me…

Channel
Bon Sens
@vivrecorrectement
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,035subscribers
-409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001329496829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vivrecorrectement |
| Description | Relais des vidéos de Silvano Trotta, de la chaîne de Vivre Sainement, et bien d'autres qui ont du bon sens. Liens vers les vidéos Odyssée, YouTube, Lbry Pour éviter la censure... Le Canal n'a aucun lien avec l'association. Il ne reprend que le logo.... |
| Created | 7 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vivrecorrectement |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:01 | 21,035 | -6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 04:08 | 21,041 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 21,046 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:49 | 21,058 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:45 | 21,065 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:00 | 21,071 | -7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 21,078 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:49 | 21,082 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:21 | 21,084 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 21,085 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 21,091 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 21,097 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 21,101 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 21,107 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 21,110 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 21,112 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 21,117 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 21,118 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 21,126 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 21,138 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.9%
- avg views ÷ 21,035 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,770
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (12 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,850
- Videos
- ≈857
- Links
- ≈5,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 47m
- Average length
- 21m 33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Si tous ces gens qui meurent, tous ces gens qui ont subi un accident vasculaire cérébral, tous ces gens qui ont une crise cardiaque étaient morts ou blessés parce que les complotistes leur avaient dit de prendre un produit médical dangereux, alors il y aurait un très bon argument pour mettre en œuvre une censure sur les réseaux sociaux et poursuivre les gens... Mais ce sont eux, pas les complotistes qui ont poussé le…
Vulnérabilités toxicologiques et signaux de sécurité émergents dans la technologie des vaccins à ARNm modifié : un examen narratif de l'expérience COVID-19, https://doi.org/10.1155/jt/8202757
2/2 Nous avons du mal à imaginer comment quelqu'un, même quelqu'un qui continue d'applaudir les injections de thérapie génique, pourrait observer ce graphique et ne pas se poser au moins la question : « Que se passe-t-il ? » Est-ce qu'ils attribueront l'augmentation des dépenses de traitements oncologiques (après avoir corrigé l'augmentation des prix due à l'inflation) à un "meilleur" diagnostic, à l'obésité, au stre…
1/2 Nous avons présenté et expliqué dans cet espace, au cours des quatre dernières années, diverses études qui expliquent les mécanismes oncogéniques des injections anti-COVID à ARN synthétique. Il s'agit de plus de 30 mécanismes indépendants et potentiellement synergiques par lesquels les cellules normales peuvent devenir cancéreuses. Ces études se reflètent dans la pratique clinique, où les médecins constatent une …
Pour ceux qui sont prêts à entendre ! Rapports VAERS des décès dus à l'ensemble des vaccins étant commercialisés depuis 1990... Jusqu'au 28/08/2026 aux États-Unis ● 1990 ➨ 80 (sans ARNm) ● 2000 ➨ 212 (sans ARNm) ● 2010 ➨ 319 (sans ARNm) ● 2011 ➨ 331 (sans ARNm) ● 2012 ➨ 316 (sans ARNm) ● 2013 ➨ 339 (sans ARNm) ● 2014 ➨ 358 (sans ARNm) ● 2015 ➨ 377 (sans ARNm) ● 2016 ➨ 437 (sans ARNm) ● 2017 ➨ 467 (sans ARNm) ● 2018 …
Notre colère, notre tristesse, ont une origine et des destinataires. Elles sont apparues lorsque le monde a basculé, au début de l'année 2020, et que de nombreuses choses que nous tenions pour acquises ont été irrémédiablement modifiées, que des concepts ont été redéfinis sans aucune justification, et que des libertés et des garanties ont été brutalement supprimées. Les destinataires de cette colère et de cette tris…
2/2 Il remonte à la biologie du désastre — protéine Spike toxique, ARNm instable, ADN plasmidique résiduel — et il descend jusqu’à la lame d’anatomopathologie, là où la preuve ne se discute plus. En République tchèque, en Italie, en Suède, au Japon, les statistiques parlent aussi d’une même voix. Et l’on démonte, pièce par pièce, la mécanique comptable, ce fameux « décalage de 14 jours », qui a rendu ailleurs les mor…
1/2 La plus grande catastrophe de l’histoire de la médecine ? Le lecteur jugera. Et si le remède avait fait davantage de morts que la maladie ? Janvier 2020. Le monde s’arrête. On confine, on muselle, on interdit de soigner, puis l’on injecte, à des milliards d’êtres humains, une technologie que personne n’avait jamais déployée à pareille échelle. Cinq ans plus tard, les chiffres sont là. Il suffit de les lire. Ce li…
Taux de mortalité par cancer chez les 15 à 49 ans entre 1980 et 2023, soit le nombre estimé de décès dus à l'ensemble des cancers chez les personnes âgées de 15 à 49 ans, pour 100 000 habitants. Vous avez remarqué que le nombre de décès liés au cancer dans cette tranche d'âge diminuait depuis 40 ans... OWID (Our World in Data) et l'IHME (institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) montrent maintenant que cette tenda…
ON EN PARLE OU PAS ? Preuves statistiques de « turbo » cancers à apparition très rapide... et une hypothèse quant au mécanisme causal. Petit rappel ! Jamais dans l'histoire humaine l'ARNm synthétique et les nucléotides modifiés n'ont été utilisés (en dehors des essais précliniques et cliniques) pour induire une réponse immunitaire protectrice. N'ayant pas été utilisés avant le SARS-CoV-2 sur quelconque infection pulm…
Soyons clairs, il semble essentiel qu'il soit entendu que la plate-forme synthétique d'ARNm a été proposée pour être utilisée pour remplacer petit à petit les inoculations traditionnelles plus coûteuses, plus lentes et plus complexes à produire. Cela a conduit à « encourager », à enhardir ou à tirer parti de la vaccination massive contre le SRAS-COV-2 (qui a clairement été un désastre, étant donné que les cas augment…
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @vivrecorrectement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@animap_fr · 6,1314 postsCeux Qui Nous Gouverne---ment
@ceuxquinousgouvernement · 4,0942 postsDEEP STATE MEDIA
@deepstatemedia · 3032 postsALETHEIA - Infokanal
@ALETHEIA_Infokanal · 16,1241 postDESOBEIS ILE-DE-FRANCE
@DESOBEISILEDEFRANCE · 831 postDavid Zentao News
@DavidZentaoNews · 181 postDenis Rancourt denies everything
@drdenies · 7711 postEntraide Bourgogne Franche-Comté 🦋
@entraidefranchecomte · 781 postJulia Wltr Officiel
@juliawltr · 931 postLes Qompilateurs
@lesqompilateurs · 2,5671 postUnisVers 𝑙'𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜
@unis_vers · 2,0341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@trottasilvano · 119,743#1
@aubontouite_francais · 48,423#2
@jdmichel · 19,984#3
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,164#4
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,231#5
@christinecotton · 18,176#6
@kompromatmedia_2 · 30,656#7
@savoirlibre · 21,114#8
@momotchiii · 34,879#9
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,852#10
@resterlibre · 26,436#11
@leveil2022 · 35,005#12
@MagazineNexus · 13,111#13
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,470#14
@radio_quebec · 41,355#15
@LeGrandReveil · 61,777#16
@KlaTV_FR · 8,225#17
@AileaStick · 11,753#18
@ah2020_org_canal · 12,869#19
@ChrisInfosTrumpAndCo · 6,679#20
@xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,334#21
@NotFound_4_04 · 13,244#22
@adnm_live · 41,439#23
@FrenchWhistleblowers · 8,349#24
@papersnest · 12,753#25
@valeriebugault · 23,416#26
@SuperMonde · 11,769 (as read 24 September 2026)#27
@stratpol · 70,621#28
@maitreXOFFICIEL · 11,825#29
@infolibre_fil_d_actus · 32,290#30
@PeterElBaze · 9,032#31
@egaliteetreconciliation · 16,908#32
@francereinfo · 4,389#33
@MarcelD442 · 11,516#34
@stefancuvelier · 8,166#35
@DivulgationOfficiel · 13,967#36
@Stanislas_Berton · 9,022#37
@geoeconomie · 26,537#38
@Ni_Oubli_Ni_Pardon · 6,851#39
@ReOpenCovid1984 · 4,109#40
@chloefinfosofficiel · 23,068#41
@SanteRire · 4,997#42
@HocineLeDZ · 13,850#43
@Esprit_Quantique · 18,165#44
@EquipeTopGun · 8,138#45
@essentiel_news · 6,676#46
@complotdunouvelordremondial · 23,222#47
@chemindeleveil · 15,549#48
@grand_reequilibrage · 41,784#49
@linfoenbref · 7,015#50
@redpillyourneighbor · 1,685#51
@kairos_presse_officiel · 11,052#52
@QactusPublic · 9,753#53
@onaeunotdose · 652#54
@brigadesantigraphene · 11,797#55
@strategika · 9,662#56
@QuebecReveille · 10,407#57
@pentagqone · 6,892#58
@Reinformation2point0 · 7,537#59
@RI_ReseauInternational · 10,411#60
@quoi2news · 30,940#61
@francoisasselineau · 15,993#62
@alexis_poulin · 24,792#63
@jqhnspartan · 8,703#64
@LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,809#65
@hakouna007 · 23,048#66
@adinadesouzy · 8,478#67
@GPTVoff · 19,070#68
@ericmontanaofficiel · 7,068#69
@LeCanal17 · 12,849#70
@lesionismedemasque · 6,462#71
@infoblocagefrance1 · 16,229#72
@intelligence_economique · 34,777#73
@infodefenseFRreserve · 28,726#74
@aubedigitale · 2,414#75
@myl_traductions · 6,806#76
@diplomaties · 36,861#77
@internationalreporters · 57,195#78
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,914#79
@JocelynePTraduction · 8,463#80
@mikeborowski1 · 9,729#81
@Vpoutine · 41,141#82
@BRICSTV · 25,704#83
@dessinssemaine · 8,449#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,852
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@reinfocovid_officiel · 25,319
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
@micheldognaofficiel · 21,887
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
@jdmichel · 19,984
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,470
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,164
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@les_patriotes · 23,502
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
@radio_quebec · 41,355
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
@LeGrandReveil · 61,777
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@momotchiii · 34,879
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
@aubontouite_francais · 48,423
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@savoirlibre · 21,114
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@chloefinfosofficiel · 23,068
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
@resterlibre · 26,436
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@trottasilvano · 119,743
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@alexis_poulin · 24,792
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bon Sens” (@vivrecorrectement), 21,035 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vivrecorrectement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.