10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,184–14,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 08:36
14,193
+6
13 Aug 2026, 00:45
14,187
-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:52
14,188
+1
11 Aug 2026, 05:31
14,187
-3
10 Aug 2026, 03:21
14,190
-13
9 Aug 2026, 01:40
14,203
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:43
14,205
-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:15
14,209
-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:04
14,210
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:54
14,210
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 14,193 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,060
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
17 (5 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
44,670
Reactions total
612
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,610
Videos
≈584
Links
≈3,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
852 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
450
52.8%
❤
308
36.2%
🔥
14
1.64%
🤡
14
1.64%
😁
13
1.53%
👏
9
1.06%
😍
6
0.704%
🤔
6
0.704%
🤣
6
0.704%
👎
5
0.587%
🙏
5
0.587%
🤮
5
0.587%
🌚
2
0.235%
💯
2
0.235%
🎅
1
0.117%
💋
1
0.117%
💩
1
0.117%
🖕
1
0.117%
😢
1
0.117%
🤨
1
0.117%
1 further kind
1
0.117%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️🌚 Ca y est, la Lune vient de passer devant le soleil 🙂
Plus sérieusement, deux choses qui ne sont mentionnées nul part pendant cette éclipse solaire et qui devraient pourtant attirer l'attention de tout le monde, c'est comment un astre aussi gros peut être aussi proche de la Terre avec toujours la même face visible depuis la Terre.
Et la seconde : pourquoi la Lune est à la fois 400 fois plus petite que le soleil …
Les sources à "Cobra" font de la divulgation progressive assumée (ce qui inclut donc temporairement une certaine quantité de désinformation pour la sécurité opérationnelle).
Et comme je l'ai mentionné il y a quelques années, mettez un calque de la chronologie détaillée qu'a reçu Corey Goode en 2022 sur les mises à jour de Cobra et vous vous rendrez compte que plus les années vont passer, plus leurs informations fini…
"Dans cette vidéo, je vous explique pourquoi la vision calorique de la perte de poids est insuffisante et parfois contre-productive, à travers l'exemple fascinant de la tribu des Hadza, chasseurs-cueilleurs de Tanzanie qui ne font pas de sport intensif, ne suivent aucun régime… et restent minces et en pleine santé.
Pourquoi bouger plus ne fait pas forcément maigrir :
Le rôle central du microbiote intestinal dans le …
Wow ! Vraiment une très bonne vidéo qui mérite d'être écoutée jusqu'au bout. Activez les sous-titres.
A n'en pas douter, la World Commerce Corporation a joué un grand rôle dans ce qui est allait se développer par la suite : le Programme Spatial Secret de l'ICC qui contrôle toute l'infrastructure de notre système solaire.
Alors qu'une divulgation contrôlée en cours continue de se développer progressivement, est ce q…
"Deux milliardaires de la Silicon Valley auraient secrètement engagé des scientifiques pour trouver un moyen de nous faire sortir de la simulation.
Mais que signifie réellement « sortir de notre réalité » ?
Tout commence en 2008 avec Lerina García Gordo, une femme affirmant s’être réveillée dans une version presque identique de sa propre vie — à une différence près : l’homme qu’elle fréquentait depuis plusieurs moi…
Un de ces facteurs, pour faire suite à mon avant-dernier post (probablement une des leçons les plus importantes que l'humanité va apprendre en cette fin de cycle), c'est que le mal imite parfaitement le bien.
Ces entités démoniaques qui contrôlent cette planète depuis des millénaires peuvent apparaitre comme elles le souhaitent. Elles peuvent susciter des émotions, voire un sentiment d'extase. Elles peuvent contrôle…
Pour améliorer sa compréhension du réel, ne jamais se contenter d'un seul point de vue, d'une seule source, d'un seul bouquin, d'un seul blog...
Sinon voilà comment on finit par croire en des choses complètement loufoques, grotesques et insensées avec toute la merdouille qui circule sur les réseaux.
Ou comment on finit par faire une dépression voire une tentative de suicide (j'en connais) après avoir cru depuis des…
🐝💧 Une fontaine pour abeilles fabriquée maison.
En cette période de chaleur, n'oublions pas que les animaux et les insectes ont eux aussi besoin de notre aide pour s'hydrater 🙏🫶
👉 https://exoconscience.com/terriens-documentaire/spiritualite-conscience/
👉 https://exoconscience.com/moins-de-viande-le-guide-complet-des-proteines-vegetales-indispensables/alternatives/
⚠️ 20 documentaires pour une meilleure compréhensi…
(suite) ...Et si vous aviez des groupes comme cela qui venaient du même système solaire et que trois ou quatre d’entre d’eux déclaraient être des Pléiades, ou quel que soit le nom du système solaire, cela devenait très compliqué pour le Programme Spatial Secret et les syndicats secrets de déterminer le faux du vrai.
Ils ont dû aller sur place et faire leurs propres vérifications.
Les Pléiades sont un vaste amas d'é…
🛑 Pourquoi je n'ai jamais utilisé le terme "Pléiadien" ?
Eh bien tout simplement parce qu'en 12 ans de recherches, je n'ai encore jamais trouvé à ce jour un groupe se présentant comme tel être réellement originaire de cet amas d'étoiles.
Il y a des allemands d'un Programme Spatial Secret qui prétendent venir de cet endroit là depuis la seconde guerre mondiale.
Il y a des humains d'un futur lointain qui sont allés …
👍17❤14👎3🌚2👏2🥴1
Signed Florent David
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DivulgationOfficiel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 449,967 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exoconscience.com” (@DivulgationOfficiel), 14,193 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DivulgationOfficiel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
