Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net -243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,931–14,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 05:21
13,967
-6
8 Nov 2026, 17:46
13,973
-5
7 Nov 2026, 11:47
13,978
-2
6 Nov 2026, 10:59
13,980
-7
5 Nov 2026, 07:40
13,987
-3
4 Nov 2026, 08:55
13,990
-2
3 Nov 2026, 12:16
13,992
-1
2 Nov 2026, 13:09
13,993
-2
1 Nov 2026, 11:55
13,995
-6
31 Oct 2026, 11:56
14,001
-6
29 Oct 2026, 07:50
14,007
+2
28 Oct 2026, 05:00
14,005
-4
27 Oct 2026, 08:27
14,009
-5
26 Oct 2026, 10:16
14,014
+2
25 Oct 2026, 09:35
14,012
-5
24 Oct 2026, 06:08
14,017
+1
23 Oct 2026, 06:46
14,016
-3
22 Oct 2026, 07:41
14,019
-2
21 Oct 2026, 04:05
14,021
-8
20 Oct 2026, 00:16
14,029
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 13,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,110
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
46 (5 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
40,441
Reactions total
410
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,660
Videos
≈584
Links
≈3,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,900 reactions across 44 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
963
50.7%
❤
636
33.5%
👏
67
3.53%
🤡
37
1.95%
🙏
34
1.79%
💯
32
1.68%
😁
20
1.05%
🔥
19
1.00%
🤔
17
0.895%
👌
10
0.526%
🤣
10
0.526%
👎
9
0.474%
🤮
7
0.368%
😍
6
0.316%
❤🔥
5
0.263%
🍌
5
0.263%
💩
4
0.211%
😢
3
0.158%
✍
2
0.105%
🌚
2
0.105%
9 further kinds
12
0.632%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,900 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (38.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
"Vous dormez 8 heures par nuit, mais vous vous réveillez épuisé ? Et si le problème ne venait pas uniquement de votre sommeil, mais aussi de ce que vous mangez et de l'heure à laquelle vous prenez votre dernier repas ?
Dans cette vidéo, nous explorons un principe fondamental de l'hygiénisme : le repos digestif. Pourquoi la digestion mobilise-t-elle une partie de notre activité physiologique ? Quel est l'impact des r…
Les interviews avec Louis Fouché, ça élève tellement le niveau !
"Louis FOUCHÉ est médecin anesthésiste réanimateur.
Après quinze années d'exercice à l'Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Marseille, il s'est consacré à la réflexion sur le soin, l'éthique et les transformations de notre époque.
Conférencier et essayiste, il est l'auteur de plusieurs ouvrages à succès, parmi lesquels Tous résistants dans l'âme et Trav…
Les sociétés secrètes, le mouvement en faveur de la divulgation des phénomènes aériens inexpliqués (UAP) et l'ère de la supercherie
Corey Goode 05/11/2026 : « Si le gouvernement rendait publics tous les dossiers sur les ovnis demain, il resterait encore une question à laquelle ces dossiers ne pourraient pas répondre. Qui a le droit de nous dire ce que signifient ces rencontres ?
J’ai vu des gens rejoindre la commun…
MILAB, GATE et « 20 and Back » : pourquoi j’ai dû remettre en question « ma vérité », par Corey Goode
Note Flo: Encore une déclaration de Corey très intéressante qui mérite d’être lu.
Je n'ai pas la même interprétation que lui de certaines de ses expériences mais le point fort dans son témoignage, c'est qu'il a compris qu'il y avait un aspect négatif, une infiltration luciférienne négative dans la divulgation.
C'e…
"Chaque année, Octobre Rose mobilise des millions d'euros, des milliers d'articles de presse et des centaines de marques autour du dépistage du cancer du sein. Mais derrière les rubans roses et les campagnes de sensibilisation, certaines questions dérangeantes restent largement absentes du débat public.
Où va réellement l'argent récolté par Octobre Rose ? Quels sont les bénéfices et les limites du dépistage par mamm…
Pour les personnes qui débarquent seulement dans l'alternatif et qui se demandent d'où vient ce système de croyance de "fédération galactique", vous avez la réponse.
Ces "anciens dieux" d'apparence nordique, qui n'ont pas toujours été sur la même longueur d'onde, contrôlent avec leurs sociétés secrètes tout le narratif de la divulgation.
Dès le début, ils ont façonné notre conscience à travers des systèmes de croya…
Corey Goode 26 octobre 2026 : "Je rédige cette déclaration afin que chacun puisse lire mon histoire en un seul endroit : ce que j’ai vécu, comment j’ai rejoint le mouvement de divulgation, ce qui a bouleversé ma compréhension des choses, et pourquoi je suis revenu vers Jésus. Je souhaite également expliquer les influences religieuses qui m’ont troublé en coulisses, ainsi que les dangers que je perçois aujourd’hui dan…
"Cinq ans après sa suspension, le Dr Louis Fouché, médecin anesthésiste-réanimateur, raconte comment cette épreuve a changé sa vie.
Après des années à résister et à dénoncer ce qu'il considère comme des dérives des institutions, il veut aujourd'hui aller plus loin : et si, au lieu de passer notre temps à dénoncer ce qui ne va pas, on cherchait aussi à construire autre chose ?
Face aux mauvaises nouvelles qui s'accu…
Doucement mais surement, de puissantes sociétés secrètes nous emmènent progressivement dans cette direction.
En tentant de détruire les grandes religions traditionnelles pour en créer une nouvelle.
Tout cela se passe sous nos yeux en temps réel.
*
"Trump, les nordiques, les dieux grecs : la divulgation extraterrestre"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-guufv2Pws
Alors que la France s'embrase et que le paquebot Titanic-France coule et va continuer progressivement de couler jusqu'au prochain basculement des pôles (il va falloir se serrer les coudes pour traverser au mieux tout ce qui s'en vient...), voici une très bonne interview de l'ancien coureur Christophe Bassons dont le témoignage et le parcours méritent d'être connus et entendus.
Le monde du vélo, tout comme du sport e…
👆👆👆 Hier soir, j'ai relevé un passage intéressant dans la petite mise à jour de Cobra sur son blog :
"Des représentants d'une certaine race extraterrestre bienveillante, dont le nom ne doit pas être divulgué, ainsi que d'autres sources, ont indiqué que le délai imparti pour la « Disclosure » touchait à sa fin et que, si les gouvernements mondiaux refusaient de divulguer ces informations assez rapidement, certains va…
👍20❤7🤔7❤🔥1🍌1💩1🤡1
Signed Florent David
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @DivulgationOfficiel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Planète animée FR @cartooncloud · 31,058 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 4 September 2026
Michel Dogna Officiel @micheldognaofficiel · 21,887 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
RGNR - Nous c’est la Vie ! @rgnr_fr · 39,032 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
CDS pour TOUS @CDSpourTOUS · 32,203 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
Bon Sens @vivrecorrectement · 21,029 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
𝙊 𝘽 𝙎 𝙀 𝙍 𝙑 𝙀 @observelemonde · 19,372 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 September 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press @LeGrandReveil · 61,777 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Momotchi @momotchiii · 34,849 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Jean-Dominique Michel (Officiel) @jdmichel · 19,980 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exoconscience.com” (@DivulgationOfficiel), 13,967 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DivulgationOfficiel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.