Responsabilité pénale à 16 ans, procureurs sous instruction : sur la carte du Courrier, Bruno Le Maire est à +3,5 sur l'autorité, le RN à +3,8. https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/bruno-le-maire-brise-le-monopole-du-rn-sur-lautoritarisme/

Channel
Rester libre !
@resterlibre
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
26,399subscribers
-590 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001268279556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @resterlibre |
| Description | Le canal libertarien du Courrier des Stratèges |
| Created | 20 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/resterlibre |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 26,399 | -37 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 17:54 | 26,436 | -6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 26,442 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 26,456 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 26,459 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 26,470 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:27 | 26,475 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:57 | 26,488 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 26,497 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:55 | 26,508 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 26,510 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 26,516 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 26,521 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 26,530 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 26,532 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 26,534 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 26,536 | +14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 26,522 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 26,526 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 26,530 | first reading |
Engagement
623 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 153 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.20%
- avg views ÷ 26,399 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,430
- 293 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.985%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 293
- of 623 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 286 of 293 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 623 (29 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 711,529 |
| Reactions total | 6,868 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 18:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,030
- Videos
- ≈3,330
- Links
- ≈15,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7h 37m
- Average length
- 3m 47s
Measured directly from 121 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,019 reactions across 605 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4,369 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 3,344 | 19.6% | |
| 👎 | 2,349 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 2,197 | 12.9% | |
| 😱 | 2,053 | 12.1% | |
| 😁 | 1,303 | 7.66% | |
| 👌 | 438 | 2.57% | |
| 👏 | 313 | 1.84% | |
| 😢 | 194 | 1.14% | |
| 🏆 | 155 | 0.911% | |
| 😭 | 150 | 0.881% | |
| 🎉 | 65 | 0.382% | |
| 🙏 | 63 | 0.37% | |
| 🕊 | 26 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 607 of the 623 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,019 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 623 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 293 posts held from the last 30 days (1.02%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
La Commission européenne veut décider de ce qu'est une interface numérique loyale. Après le DMA et le DSA, voici le Digital Fairness Act. Jusqu'où ira l'administration européenne dans la réglementation de l'économie ? https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/digital-fairness-act-bruxelles-veut-reglementer-jusquaux-boutons-de-vos-sites-web/
🔥6👎5
Signed L A
300 000 euros pour des travaux sans autorisation : voilà ce que prévoit le Code de l'urbanisme. Remplacer des volets battants par des volets roulants peut suffire à déclencher une obligation de déclaration préalable. Jusqu'où ira le contrôle administratif ? https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/changer-ses-volets-sans-papier-en-mairie-cest-1-200-euros-damende-minimum/
👎23🔥10❤4👍3
Signed L A
Bouaye interdisait les rassemblements devant le lycée jusqu'au 1er mars, puis a retiré l'arrêté deux heures avant l'audience. Strasbourg et Poitiers suspendus. https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/lhumeur-de-veerle-une-maire-chouanne-veut-supprimer-la-liberte-de-reunion/
🔥6❤2
Teddy Riner candidat le 9 novembre, sans parti ni programme publié. Philippe recule à 10,9 %. Le centre se cherche un visage faute d'avoir des idées. https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/teddy-riner-candidat-la-notoriete-ne-fait-pas-un-programme/
😁21😱1
Posted without readable text
❤2
17% de l'épargne des morts et des oubliés spoliés par l'Etat
👎11
Supprimé par les députés de LFI au RN, le prélèvement de 17 % sur l'argent oublié des Français revient au Sénat. 1,4 milliard affiché. https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/argent-des-morts-et-des-oublies-supprime-par-les-deputes-le-prelevement-de-17-revient-au-senat/
👎18🔥3
Un décret publié, un règlement prêt, aucun versement : à qui la faute si 1 000 demandes dorment dans les tiroirs ? https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/artistes-auteurs-lurssaf-recupere-leurs-aides-sociales-et-ne-verse-rien-depuis-cinq-mois/
👎14🔥5
Signed L A
Generali Vie assure 6 des 18 contrats en ligne relevés, Suravenir 4. La garantie FGAP plafonne à 70 000 € par personne et par assureur. https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/qui-assure-vraiment-votre-assurance-vie-la-carte-de-31-contrats-assureur-par-assureur/
👍3
Deux millions d'immigrés en moins. 280 milliards d'euros pour redresser les finances publiques. Éric Zemmour lance sa campagne présidentielle avec deux chiffres spectaculaires. Mais derrière les annonces, où sont les mécanismes, les garanties juridiques et le financement détaillé ? https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/eric-zemmour-je-veux-quil-y-ait-moins-dimmigres-a-la-fin-de-mon-quinquennat/
❤12👎11👏7🔥5
Signed L A
Un SMIC à 2 200 euros : la promesse est généreuse sur un plateau de télévision. Mais le boulanger et le plombier devront bien trouver l'argent pour payer leurs salariés. Et ceux qui ne le pourront pas ? https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/fabien-roussel-nous-demandons-de-porter-le-smic-a-2-200-euros-brut/
👎38😁21👍3😱3🎉2❤1
Signed L A
Showing the 12 most recent of 623 posts we hold for @resterlibre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 29 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Trump est tombé à cause de la remigration...
- Marine Le Pen n'osera pas l'essayer en France19%
- Le faire en France, c'est la révolution immédiate dans la rue13%
- La remigration est souhaitable pour relever le pays28%
- Je ne suis pas contre, mais je pense que personne n'osera19%
- Déporter massivement des gens qui travaillent et ont une famille est une honte21%
- Fermer les frontières suffirait et serait déjà immense48%
- Ceux qui souhaitent la remigration ne savent pas ce que c'est13%
- Sans immigrés, même clandestins, le pays s'arrête12%
- Aucun Français ne voudra faire le boulot des immigrés19%
- Sans opinion7%
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
La grande crise bancaire
- Une vieille lune : à force de l'annoncer, elle arrivera... mais quand ?19%
- Je la crois imminente18%
- Je ne pense pas qu'elle arrivera sous la forme cataclysmique qu'on croit14%
- Je pense que les institutions ont mis en place des dispositifs qui amortissent les chocs7%
- Les dirigeants sont incompétents : le risque existe plus que jamais28%
- L'objectif de la caste est de créer le chaos par une crise généralisée51%
- J'ai peur de ce qui va arriver11%
- Il y aura des secousses, mais je pense que la caste s'est préparée à les limiter12%
- Aucune opinion7%
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Le SMIC : l'augmenter ou le baisser ?
- Votre question est une pure provocation : il faut bien sûr l'augmenter13%
- La question mérite d'être posée et débattue28%
- L'écrasement des salaires décourage tout le monde45%
- L'Etat ne doit pas se mêler de politique salariale37%
- Il est bien que l'Etat protège les salariés contre les employeurs6%
- Les employeurs exploitent les salariés6%
- Une hausse du SMIC va pousser encore plus à la délocalisation28%
- Aucune opinion6%
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Les jeunes se révoltent-ils contre l'assignation sociale ?
- Je pense que c'est une bonne explication de fond25%
- Je nuancerais beaucoup : ça peut jouer, mais il y a un problème de racailles avant tout40%
- N'importe quoi : la société française n'est pas bloquée2%
- Croire que les jeunes les plus violents sont en réaction contre l'assignation, c'est bull shit31%
- Dans tous les cas, nous devrons faire un examen de conscience sur nos blocages32%
- Ils n'ont qu'à faire des efforts,nous n'avons rien à négocier7%
- Pas d'opinion10%
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Le piège que la caste tend à Marine Le Pen et qu'elle ne semble pas voir...
- Je n'imagine pas une présidentielle sans candidat RN28%
- Je pense que la caste n'hésitera pas à le faire pour se sauver44%
- Les électeurs RN manquent de clairvoyance sur les inconvénients de l'ordre qu'il réclame28%
- Tel sera pris qui croyait prendre et ce sera bien fait10%
- La liberté de manifester, ça suffit - il faut passer à un système fort2%
- La fin de la liberté de manifester est le prix à payer pour redresser le pays1%
- Si Marine est déclarée inéligible, il faudra descendre dans la rue13%
- Je ne vote pas RN, mais je me battrai pour qu'elle puisse se présenter21%
- Le système est terriblement machiavélique42%
- Pas d'opinion6%
The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
La tiers-mondisation de la France...
- Elle est le fait d'une bureaucratie obèse qui veut tout contrôler73%
- C'est à cause des immigrés14%
- A force d'avoir un système de retraites immobile, on ruine le reste15%
- Peu à peu, les classes sociales se figent, et ça paralyse le pays11%
- J'aurais 20 ans, je quitterais la France qui est devenue irrespirable29%
- Le pays est bloqué par ses dirigeants, il s'appauvrit63%
- Le pays est bloqué par les boomers, il s'appauvrit13%
- Tous les Français s'avachissent, et le déclin est une responsabilité collective36%
- Je ne sais pas trop2%
The shares total 256%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 623 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@AFPDepeches · 4,18811 postsNeodia
@neodia · 47,4104 postsTutti i fatti
@tutti_i_fatti · 50,2684 postsEurointel+
@eurointel · 11,0733 postsThe Global Eye
@tglobaleye · 11,4932 postsNew Eastern Outlook FR
@NewEasternOutlookFR · 1,2351 postRerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 160,2651 postAntiFakeNews
@yourantifakenews · 19,2001 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@resterlibre named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 3 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@stratpol · 70,621#1
@trottasilvano · 119,618#2
@kompromatmedia_2 · 30,632#3
@aubontouite_francais · 48,423#4
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,231#5
@rybarFR · 21,448#6
@RI_ReseauInternational · 10,411#7
@egaliteetreconciliation · 16,900#8
@kopylovakatya · 10,263#9
@momotchiii · 34,849#10
@francoisasselineau · 15,984#11
@jdmichel · 19,980#12
@savoirlibre · 21,114#13
@quoi2news · 30,922#14
@GPTVoff · 19,074#15
@infodefenseFRreserve · 28,722#16
@Stanislas_Berton · 9,015#17
@alexis_poulin · 24,776#18
@YoussefHindi · 15,187#19
@InstitutBrennus · 2,312#20
@thomasovitch · 20,023#21
@valeriebugault · 23,395#22
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,164#23
@xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,310#24
@hussonlibrespropos · 1,093#25
@grand_reequilibrage · 41,784#26
@la_realgeopolitik · 12,664#27
@Vpoutine · 41,141#28
@infoblocagefrance1 · 16,225#29
@LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,783#30
@diplomaties · 36,830#31
@TVLofficiel · 6,903#32
@Repaire_k · 9,238#33
@NotFound_4_04 · 13,244#34
@adinadesouzy · 8,478#35
@reseauvoltaire · 3,690#36
@russiepolitic · 3,525#37
@christinecotton · 18,176#38
@GavrocheFrance · 16,229#39
@adnm_live · 41,439#40
@chroniques_des_conflits · 35,330#41
@AileaStick · 11,746#42
@intelligence_economique · 34,750#43
@odctvofficiel · 2,533#44
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,899#45
@MagazineNexus · 13,117#46
@REF_INFO24 · 1,805#47
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,470#48
@LeGrandReveil · 61,777#49
@pierreantoineplaquevent · 2,825#50
@VuDuDroit · 2,825#51
@vivrecorrectement · 21,029#52
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,852#53
@ah2020_org_canal · 12,869#54
@BRICSTV · 25,704#55
@MarcelD442 · 11,515#56
@FrenchWhistleblowers · 8,349#57
@InvestigAction2004 · 5,119#58
@HocineLeDZ · 13,831#59
@internationalreporters · 57,195#60
@boriskarpovrussie · 21,168#61
@leveil2022 · 34,969#62
@eurasianform · 26,273#63
@radio_quebec · 41,355#64
@strategiemilitaire · 12,845#65
@ericmontanaofficiel · 7,068#66
@laurentbrayarddonbass · 5,371#67
@prozorov_fr · 24,374#68
@dessinssemaine · 8,449#69
@hakouna007 · 23,048#70
@lesionismedemasque · 6,462#71
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 202,401#72
@russiabeyond_fr · 9,730#73
@veillestrategique · 4,015#74
@strategie_militaire · 21,991#75
@villagerussie · 6,645#76
@TASS_europe · 5,777#77
@vivreenrussie · 5,618#78
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 65,967#79
@alexandrefrussien · 12,638#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@reinfocovid_officiel · 25,299
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
@GPTVoff · 19,074
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
@les_patriotes · 23,502
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
@jdmichel · 19,980
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,852
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@alexis_poulin · 24,776
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@vivrecorrectement · 21,029
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
@savoirlibre · 21,114
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@valeriebugault · 23,395
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
@kompromatmedia_2 · 30,632
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@momotchiii · 34,849
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,470
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,310
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
@chloefinfosofficiel · 22,991
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,164
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@LeGrandReveil · 61,777
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@aubontouite_francais · 48,423
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@trottasilvano · 119,618
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@stratpol · 70,621
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@micheldognaofficiel · 21,887
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,231
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,783
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
@quoi2news · 30,922
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
@complotdunouvelordremondial · 23,244
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Éric Verhaeghe |
|---|---|
| Description | French official and essayist |
| X / Twitter | @Verhaeghe |
| Official site | https://lecourrierdesstrateges.fr |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rester libre !” (@resterlibre), 26,399 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resterlibre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.