Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BonSens.org Officiel

@BonSens_org

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,743subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567986756
TypeChannel
Username@BonSens_org
Descriptionhttps://t.me/BonSens_org Préserver le bon sens pour les générations actuelles et futures
Created9 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BonSens_org

Growth

9,7439,7569,749.56 August 2026 — 9,756 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,756 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,743 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,741–9,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:239,743-10
9 Aug 2026, 11:529,753-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,756no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:429,756first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 9,743 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total29,930
Reactions total929
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
996
Videos
317
Links
1,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 07s
Average length
2m 32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,683 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍87852.2%
23213.8%
🙏1448.56%
😁1227.25%
👏1076.36%
🤬905.35%
🍾362.14%
😢241.43%
🤔221.31%
💯211.25%
👎60.357%
🤷‍♂10.059%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,683reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈2,200 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 COMMUNIQUÉ DE BONSENS_ORG – 1ER AOÛT 2026 Demander la transparence sur les juges n'est pas menacer la République, c'est la défendre. En transformant une demande d'impartialité sur l’#AideAMourir en « menace » contre la Démocratie, le Conseil cherche à couper court au débat. Nous ne nous tairons pas. Le 21 juillet, BonSens.org a déposé une plainte pénale pour prise illégale d’intérêts contre quatre membres du Co

👍93👏369🤔5🤬1

28 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈3,170 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Bonsens_Org vient de déposer une contribution extérieure au Conseil constitutionnel (n° 2026-911 DC) contre la loi interdisant les réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans. Une interdiction générale n’est ni proportionnée ni scientifiquement étayée. Elle risque d’aggraver les dangers pour les mineurs (contournement, isolement, report vers le dark web). Lire le communiqué https://bonsens.info/contribution-exterieure-au

👍100🙏182👏1🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,710 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🧭 COVER-UP FAUCI : LES DOCUMENTS SECRETS DE RAND PAUL FONT TREMBLER WASHINGTON À LA VEILLE DU TÉMOIGNAGE SOUS SUBPOENA Les derniers développements de l’enquête du sénateur Rand Paul sur les origines du COVID-19 : documents explosifs, doutes privés des scientifiques et témoignage imminent de Fauci Alors que le Dr Anthony Fauci doit comparaître sous subpoena devant le Comité sénatorial sur la Sécurité intérieure et le

👍73🤬10🙏2💯1

25 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,420 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour par Pilex

😁78👏13👍4👎1

24 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,330 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🧭 SANTÉ : LE PLAFOND DES FRANCHISES MÉDICALES VA DOUBLER, une mesure qui cible les plus gros consommateurs de soins Le gouvernement confirme un nouveau tour de vis sur les dépenses de santé. La ministre de la Santé, Stéphanie Rist, a annoncé qu'un décret était en préparation afin de porter de 100 à 200 euros par an le plafond des franchises médicales et des participations forfaitaires. L'objectif affiché est de cont

🤬66🤔93👎2

21 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,710 views146 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Loi sur l’aide à mourir : une action inédite pour garantir l’impartialité du contrôle constitutionnel : BonSens_org a déposé une plainte pour prise illégale d’intérêts (art. 432-12 du Code pénal) contre quatre membres du Conseil constitutionnel saisis de la loi sur l’aide à mourir : Richard Ferrand, Jacques Mézard, Laurence Vichnievsky et Alain Juppé. Objectif : permettre à la justice de vérifier l’absence de tout

👍102👏2717

21 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC≈2,590 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour

👍55👎21😁1

18 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC≈4,740 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026

CONTRIBUTION EXTERIEURE A LA SAISINE N° 2026-910 DC RELATIVE A LA LOI SUR LE DROIT A L’AIDE A MOURIR La loi « aide à mourir » a été adoptée… mais le combat continue au Conseil constitutionnel ! BonSensorg dénonce : • Absence totale de traçabilité de la volonté • Critères d’éligibilité trop larges qui détournent la loi de l’objectif de « fin de vie » • Délais de réflexion manifestement insuffisants (seulement 2

🙏8421🤬10👍5

16 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC≈3,470 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

19👍19🤷‍♂1

13 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC≈7,040 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔍 [DNC] SONDAGE ÉLEVEURS BOVINS Hélène BANOUN et Laurent TOUBIANA ont lancé une enquête scientifique TOTALEMENT indépendante et 100 % ANONYME soutenue par BonSens, pour recueillir les observations des éleveurs sur les éventuels EFFETS INDÉSIRABLES des vaccins contre la dermatose nodulaire contagieuse bovine (DNC). Que vous ayez constaté ou non des effets indésirables, votre participation est essentielle pour faire

👍63👏2316

11 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC≈3,410 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Le BonSens de l'Humour par Pilex

😁36😢24👍94

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BonSens_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 101,794 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BonSens.org Officiel” (@BonSens_org), 9,743 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BonSens_org.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.