Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stanislas Berton

Channel

Stanislas Berton

@Stanislas_Berton

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,015subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429325753
TypeChannel
Username@Stanislas_Berton
Created1 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stanislas_Berton

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fdesoucheofficiel/520799 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC@Stanislas_Berton/11745 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC1.001.7 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@fdesoucheofficiel5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hours@fdesoucheofficiel (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 249 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,9739,0279,0006 August 2026 — 8,998 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,995 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,988 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,988 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,983 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,976 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,979 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,983 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,981 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,973 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,979 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,992 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,995 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,005 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,013 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,021 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,027 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,021 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,022 subscribers13 November 2026 — 9,015 subscribers9,0156 August 202613 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 99 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,965–9,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 00:499,015-7
8 Nov 2026, 15:029,022+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:069,021+5
30 Oct 2026, 14:079,016-11
27 Oct 2026, 23:119,027+6
24 Oct 2026, 19:119,021+5
18 Oct 2026, 11:009,016+3
15 Oct 2026, 15:269,013+8
12 Oct 2026, 12:199,005+10
5 Oct 2026, 20:418,995+3
28 Sept 2026, 18:578,992+13
18 Sept 2026, 19:408,979+6
14 Sept 2026, 14:408,973-8
11 Sept 2026, 03:418,981-2
6 Sept 2026, 15:018,983+4
1 Sept 2026, 18:238,979+2
29 Aug 2026, 18:468,977+1
26 Aug 2026, 13:218,976-1
23 Aug 2026, 03:128,977-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:118,983first reading

Engagement

297 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 9,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 297 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 127 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held297 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total161,620
Reactions total4,349
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 00:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13m 06s
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,061 reactions across 288 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,05025.3%
🙏2,27218.8%
❤2,22618.5%
👏8467.01%
🤬5954.93%
💯5704.73%
😈4653.86%
🔥2442.02%
🤮2412.00%
🤔2331.93%
👌2111.75%
❤‍🔥1080.895%
😁1050.871%
🤣1030.854%
🤪1020.846%
😭740.614%
🍾720.597%
🤯720.597%
🥴720.597%
👎530.439%
26 further kinds3472.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 289 of the 297 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 297 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 129 posts held from the last 30 days (6.98%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC684 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Pour un décryptage de l'opération Q et le récit de ses coulisses, lire le livre exceptionnel de @paul_furber dont la seule traduction au monde est française! Le livre de référence sur un sujet qui donne les clés pour comprendre la géopolitique passée, présente et future. https://www.amazon.fr/dp/2958490610

👍11❤1🥴1

12 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC890 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Vu l'intérêt suscité par ce sujet, je vous propose de découvrir ma capsule consacrée à l'Opération Q. J'en présente les grandes lignes et reviens sur quatre éléments importants dont les autres "experts" ne parlent jamais... https://youtu.be/rv_Sp5_oY9c

👍14🤣3

12 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC974 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Capture d'écran du fameux message d'octobre 2025, effacé depuis. Si j'étais journaliste, j'aurais tout de suite appelé son secrétariat et demandé pourquoi le PDG du fond souverain russe retweetait du Q et comment la Russie et la Chine se coordonnaient avec Trump. 🤷‍♂️

👍18🤪4🤔2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,000 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Steve Witkoff et Jared Kushner, envoyés par le président Trump, ont été accueillis par Kirill Dmitriev avant de rencontrer le président Poutine. Le même K. Dmitriev qui, il y a un an, retweetait le message de Q sur la coopération russo-américano-chinoise contre le NWO. https://x.com/kadmitriev/status/2120746499642413164

🙏17👀2

12 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,070 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Très bon rappel du Saint Père. Depuis des décennies, les "raisons pastorales" ont servi de prétexte pour diluer, voire nier l'enseignement de l’Église sur un grand nombre de sujets, et particulièrement sur la morale et la sexualité. Le pape a rappelé qu'aucune intention pastorale, aussi généreuse soit-elle, ne peut rendre moralement juste ce qui est intrinsèquement mauvais. "Le pape a également dénoncé les fautes p…

❤20👏14

12 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,160 views43 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Très bon post de @paul_furber sur Gab qui rappelle que les changements de fond semblent au départ imperceptibles et ce n'est qu'une fois que le processus est arrivé à son terme que l'on peut mesurer l'ampleur du chemin parcouru. En ce qui concerne la situation actuelle : -les médias de masse sont en train de mourir, de moins en moins de gens les prennent au sérieux -de moins en moins de gens croient au changement …

👍21🙏15💯4👌2❤1

11 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,290 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏20

11 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,310 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Il est difficile de comprendre des événements comme les guerres mondiales sans la grille de lecture sacrificielle. Comme l'a expliqué René Girard, le sacré repose sur le sacrifice et seul le catholicisme permet, par le sacrifice ultime du Christ sur la Croix, de sortir par le haut de la crise sacrificielle et du règne des sacrifices sanglants. Or, les Révolutions, dont celle de 1789 fut la matrice, furent littéralem…

❤26👍19💯4❤‍🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,330 views54 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Nous fêtons aujourd'hui la saint Martin Évangélisateur de la Gaule, Saint Patron de la France, auteur de nombreux miracles. Le Maréchal Foch choisit la date du 11 novembre pour l'armistice en référence à Saint Martin. Saint Martin, priez pour nous et pour la France.

🙏38❤16

11 Nov 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,280 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Je vous informe que le vendredi 11 décembre à 19h30, je donnerai une conférence à Mulhouse sur le thème : "La France à l'heure du choix". Je remercie le cercle @CercleFdC pour son invitation. Les inscriptions sont ouvertes.

👍9🥱1

11 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,250 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Cela fait depuis 2022 (Vol III des Essais) que je parle d'une alliance americano-russo-chinoise qui combat le mondialisme, au-delà des rivalités sur certains sujets et d'intérêts stratégiques parfois divergents. J'ai été mis sur cette piste par le fameux post de Q "Et si la Russie, la Chine et d'autres se coordonnaient avec Trump pour détruire le Nouvel Ordre Mondial ?" qui date justement du 11 novembre 2017. Sans…

👍21🙏4❤3🤪3

11 Nov 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,270 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Pour changer de sujet, une analyse remarquable de l'affaire Huang/Nvidia qui rappelle que Nvidia cherchait depuis des années, avec l'accord de l'administration Trump, à vendre des puces IA à la Chine, "l'espionne" n'étant que l'intermédiaire. En réalité, cette affaire permet aux opposants à cet accord de le neutraliser sans passer par la voie législative, dans le cadre plus large d'une guerre autour des data-centers…

❤4💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 297 posts we hold for @Stanislas_Berton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Christine Deviers-Joncour Officiel
@xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,334
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
Valérie Bugault officiel ⚖️
@valeriebugault · 23,395
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Jean-Dominique Michel (Officiel)
@jdmichel · 19,980
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Aubontouitefrancais
@aubontouite_francais · 48,423
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Chloé F - canal info officiel
@chloefinfosofficiel · 23,068
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
LLP LeLibrePenseur.org
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,470
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Momotchi
@momotchiii · 34,879
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Radio-Québec
@radio_quebec · 41,355
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷
@les_patriotes · 23,502
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
Silvano Trotta Officiel
@trottasilvano · 119,618
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
🎙 ALEXIS POULIN 🎙
@alexis_poulin · 24,776
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
La Nouvelle France 🇫🇷
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,899
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
Rester libre !
@resterlibre · 26,399
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
KOMPЯOMAT
@kompromatmedia_2 · 30,656
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Black Bond PTV ⚔️🦅😇
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,231
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
𝙊 𝘽 𝙎 𝙀 𝙍 𝙑 𝙀
@observelemonde · 19,372
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 September 2026
Infos citoyennes
@LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,783
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
Boris Karpov 🇷🇺 📣 Brèves de Russie
@boriskarpovrussie · 21,088
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
Bon Sens
@vivrecorrectement · 21,029
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press
@LeGrandReveil · 61,777
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
La Vérité Diffusée
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,164
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Alexandra Henrion Caude️️️ ️️
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,852
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE
@GPTVoff · 19,074
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
REINFO Officiel
@reinfocovid_officiel · 25,319
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stanislas Berton” (@Stanislas_Berton), 9,015 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stanislas_Berton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.