Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 51 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,839–9,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 18:18
9,856
-29
17 Sept 2026, 09:20
9,885
-8
13 Sept 2026, 09:18
9,893
-5
9 Sept 2026, 06:38
9,898
-14
3 Sept 2026, 19:01
9,912
-7
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
9,919
-11
28 Aug 2026, 13:43
9,930
-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:03
9,932
-6
21 Aug 2026, 17:36
9,938
-7
18 Aug 2026, 13:34
9,945
-9
15 Aug 2026, 11:59
9,954
-6
12 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,960
-3
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
9,963
-8
6 Aug 2026, 13:10
9,971
+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,970
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:43
9,970
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
41m 57s
Average length
1m 37s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,396 reactions across 31 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
755
31.5%
🤮
444
18.5%
🤬
320
13.4%
💯
247
10.3%
😁
101
4.22%
😈
100
4.17%
💩
74
3.09%
🙏
73
3.05%
❤
67
2.80%
🤔
51
2.13%
👏
39
1.63%
🤡
37
1.54%
🔥
31
1.29%
😱
25
1.04%
🤯
9
0.376%
🖕
6
0.25%
🥴
5
0.209%
👌
4
0.167%
🤣
3
0.125%
🍾
2
0.083%
3 further kinds
3
0.125%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Le Grand Orient est la principale loge maçonnique qui participe à l'Etat profond. C'est le cerveau de tous ceux qui nous dirigent.
On le voit avec le fait que la république est maçonnique. Rappelez-vous ce qu'a dit Macron en discours chez les francs-maçons "vous êtes la république"
Un homme qui a frappé le violeur de son fils de 6 ans a été condamné à 17 ans de prison ferme.
C'est une totale inversion des valeurs, les coupables deviennent des victimes et les victimes des coupables.
Emmanuel Macron a annoncé à l'éleveur Pierre-Guillaume Mercadal lors d'une réunion avec les syndicalistes agricoles qu'il "revoterait pour lui une 3ème fois".
Pourquoi cette affirmation ? Est-ce qu'en effet Macron va rester après 2027 ?
Tout est possible !
Le 28 août à 19h, sur Géopolitique profonde @GPTVoff en direct le grand débat Alain Soral @officielsoral au Dr Thomas Guénolé @thomas_guenole
Ce sera un débat sans censure et sans politiquement correct.
Les idées doivent se confronter librement, c'est ça la réelle liberté.
Il se dit dans certains milieux que Macron veut tout faire pour que Marine Le Pen soit élue afin qu'il y ait une insurrection populaire de l'extrême-gauche, Macron trouverait ainsi l'excuse afin de faire annuler l'élection et se maintenir au pouvoir.
La république a pactisé avec Satan et il faut le dire les réseaux p.do existent comme celui de Pierre Robert cousin de Jean-Michel qui a monté un réseau en France et au Sénégal.
30 gendarmes ont été envoyés à 6h du matin chez Kyria comme si elle était une criminelle alors qu'elle est une agricultrice qui aime son métier.
Honte à toutes ces forces de l'ordre qui ne protègent que le régime et ceux qui la dirigent.
Pourquoi aucun grand média ne parle de l'ingérence des banques depuis plus de 10 ans afin de soutenir un des leur qu'est Emmanuel Macron ?
Il y a en république mauvaise ingérence et bonne ingérence
Il n'y aura pas de présidentielles en 2027, nous allons de plus en plus vers cette solution.
Le système n'ayant pas de remplaçant crédible à Macron, ce fameux système a besoin de Macron pour encore quelques temps.
Pourquoi la justice Française ne veut toujours pas montrer publiquement les 4500 mails de Jeffrey Epstein ?
Qu'est-ce que la justice cache ? Est-elle impliquée dans les affaires Epstein ?
👍62❤29💯5😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @mikeborowski1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mikeborowski1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@paplaquevent named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Chloé F - canal info officiel @chloefinfosofficiel · 23,473 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
🎙 ALEXIS POULIN 🎙 @alexis_poulin · 25,144 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Alexandra Henrion Caude️️️ ️️ @alexandrahenrioncaude · 39,262 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷 @les_patriotes · 23,673 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
Jean-Dominique Michel (Officiel) @jdmichel · 20,024 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Momotchi @momotchiii · 35,120 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Bon Sens @vivrecorrectement · 21,227 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mike Borowski” (@mikeborowski1), 9,856 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikeborowski1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.