Channel
@FrenchWhistleblowers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,466subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001232024866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FrenchWhistleblowers |
| Created | 11 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FrenchWhistleblowers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 8,466 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 8,476 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 8,489 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 8,499 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,500 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 8,500 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (1 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,260 |
| Reactions total | 471 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
855 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 309 | 36.1% | |
| 🤬 | 196 | 22.9% | |
| ❤ | 113 | 13.2% | |
| 👏 | 89 | 10.4% | |
| 🙏 | 62 | 7.25% | |
| 🤡 | 57 | 6.67% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 2.34% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 855reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Depuis 2024, nous vous alertons sur ce risque majeur ! ⚠️ Et si le danger venait du ciel ! Ils vous parlent de guerre mondiale, de pandémie, d’effondrement de la société, de l’économie. Avec National Geographic nous vous alertons que le danger pourrait venir du ciel,... du soleil ! ⁉️Si le cycle solaire actuel produisait une éruption aussi forte que l’événement de Carrington en 1859, elle pourrait avoir des conséqu…
👍13❤3🤡1
#Alerte "Quand tu es handicapé, tu n'as rien a faire sur cette Terre" Merci de signaler massivement cette "petite merde"* qui veut tuer ou inciter les handicapés à se suicider ! * Leurs comptes : voir dans les commentaires A TOUS ! Ne pas réagir sur leurs comptes mais les signaler à Pharos https://internet-signalement.gouv.fr/
🤬42❤2👎2🤡2
⚠️ Alerte info Le Conseil constitutionnel censure l'interdiction des réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans car elle porte "une atteinte disproportionnée" à leur liberté d'expression.
👏35🤡15👍10
🆓 DAVID McBRIDE EST LIBRE ! David McBride, l'avocat militaire qui avait divulgué aux médias des preuves de crimes de guerre commis par l'Australie en Afghanistan, a été libéré sur parole jeudi après avoir passé plus de deux ans en prison, suite à un diagnostic de cancer du poumon à un stade précoce. McBride avait été condamné à six ans de prison après avoir plaidé coupable, le juge de première instance lui ayant ref…
🙏16❤8👏2
Une interdiction pour limiter les accidents des jeunes conducteurs Cette nouvelle mesure vise à limiter les accidents impliquant des conducteurs inexpérimentés, même si le seuil de puissance reste encore à définir. La loi RIPOST, entrée en vigueur à la mi-juillet 2026, introduit une nouvelle restriction pour les automobilistes en période probatoire. Son article 3 interdit désormais de conduire, de se voir prêter o…
🤡17👍10❤4
ENTRETIEN. Richard Ferrand : « Vouloir disqualifier le Conseil constitutionnel, c’est s’attaquer à la démocratie » Loi sur la fin de vie, pesticides, réseaux sociaux… Cet été, le Conseil constitutionnel est saisi de nombreux textes sensibles. Son président, Richard Ferrand, sort du silence dans un entretien exclusif à Ouest-France. Pour expliquer comment les neuf Sages rendent leurs décisions : « Le mot-clé de notr…
🤬34🤡15❤5😢1
« Vouloir disqualifier le Conseil constitutionnel, c’est s’attaquer à la démocratie. » La formule est claire. Le message aussi : il ne s’agit plus de répondre à une question légitime d’impartialité, mais de renvoyer hors du champ républicain l’exercice d’un droit de recours. Une question simple et de principe Le Conseil constitutionnel est actuellement saisi de la loi relative au droit à l’aide à mourir, texte d’une…
🤬30👍7❤2👏1
Ce grand feu de Gironde avait-il été annoncé des années à l’avance ? 2022 : Bordeaux Métropole demande aux sylviculteurs du Médoc d’accepter le projet « "Champ captant des Landes du Médoc". Ils refusent, craignant un déséquilibre hydrique sur la forêt. 2024 : un expert québécois est envoyé. Il valide le projet. Mai 2026 : les forestiers dénoncent le "silence radio" de Bordeaux Métropole. Plus aucune nouvelle alors…
🤬44❤7👏3👎1
2 vidéos pour résumer le manque d'anticipation de l'État ! Face aux incendies en Gironde, c'est toute la région qui se mobilise. Les habitants viennent prêter main forte aux pompiers, pour les approvisionner en eau ou arroser les fumerolles et les souches.
🙏32👍4😢1
Compost et canicule : ce geste ultra courant déclenche des départs de feu chaque été En plein après-midi de juillet, le jardin vibre sous 38 °C, le tuyau d’arrosage traîne près du potager et le tas de compost craque de sécheresse. Une légère fumée s’échappe parfois, comme un souffle chaud derrière le cabanon. Réflexe quasi automatique : lui donner une bonne douche pour le « refroidir ». C’est pourtant ce geste banal…
👍14❤7🤬4
Peut-on rouler à 137 km/h en électrique, quels sont les risques ? 🧐 On entend souvent dire : "Si je règle mon régulateur sur 137 km/h, je suis à 130 km/h réel et je ne risque rien." C’est une pratique courante, mais est-ce vraiment une bonne idée, surtout en électrique ? Petit décryptage technique et légal pour vous éclairer. La réalité du compteur vs GPS La plupart des constructeurs appliquent une marge de sécurit…
👏5👎4❤3😢3🤡2
Channel name was changed to «Lanceurs d'alerte Info»
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @FrenchWhistleblowers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 313,668 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lanceurs d'alerte Info” (@FrenchWhistleblowers), 8,466 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrenchWhistleblowers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.