Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Equipe Top Gun

Channel

Equipe Top Gun

@EquipeTopGun

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,138subscribers

-217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001806870515
TypeChannel
Username@EquipeTopGun
DescriptionLes traductions de l'équipe Top Gun, toutes réunies ici.
Created17 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/EquipeTopGun

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@AileaStick/2292630 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC@EquipeTopGun/3356 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@AileaStick/231249 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC@EquipeTopGun/3387 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC1.007 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@AileaStick6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.6 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 47 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Viv_publication. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,1388,3558,246.56 August 2026 — 8,355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,355 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,346 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,342 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,337 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,333 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,319 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,313 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,305 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,299 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,289 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,275 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,269 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,262 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,242 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,223 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,216 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,208 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,200 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,194 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,190 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,180 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,169 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,163 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,153 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,147 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,138 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,105–8,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 13:498,138-9
7 Nov 2026, 07:178,147-6
4 Nov 2026, 14:378,153-10
1 Nov 2026, 21:568,163-6
30 Oct 2026, 03:588,169-11
26 Oct 2026, 22:558,180-10
24 Oct 2026, 00:068,190-4
21 Oct 2026, 04:508,194-6
18 Oct 2026, 04:088,200-8
15 Oct 2026, 08:518,208-8
12 Oct 2026, 06:368,216-7
5 Oct 2026, 14:168,223-19
28 Sept 2026, 01:018,242-20
18 Sept 2026, 14:168,262-7
14 Sept 2026, 13:198,269-6
10 Sept 2026, 22:418,275-14
5 Sept 2026, 18:388,289-10
1 Sept 2026, 08:378,299-6
29 Aug 2026, 02:348,305-8
25 Aug 2026, 15:538,313first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 8,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held47 (25 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total8,577
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈645
Videos
≈1,830
Links
≈2,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8h 01m
Average length
22m 57s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,379 reactions across 47 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34124.7%
🔥25618.6%
❤16111.7%
👏1168.41%
🤬1047.54%
🤮866.24%
🙏825.95%
💩594.28%
💯463.34%
😈362.61%
😱211.52%
🤡130.943%
👎100.725%
👀90.653%
💊90.653%
👌80.58%
🤯50.363%
💔40.29%
😭30.218%
🤔30.218%
5 further kinds70.508%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC802 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationVideo

Une nouvelle présentation édifiante du Prof. Stefan Homburg à voir absolument : Complices de la politique Covid ❇️ Mme Hennig, journaliste du podcast "Le point sur le Coronavirus" avec Drosten, a eu une audience de plus de 150 millions de téléchargements et d’écoutes cumulés. Elle déclare en novembre 2026 à la Commission d’enquête sur le Covid : "En février 2020, par exemple, les chiffres d'infection étaient bas gr…

🤬13🔥5😱3❤1

9 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC855 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026

https://youtu.be/rf0BzKfZcRQ 👇🧐Manufactured Crisis- HPV Hype and Horror est un documentaire de l'Alliance pour la santé naturelle. Il est sorti en 2017, il est censuré sur #Youtube. Ce documentaire raconte les histoires déchirantes de familles du Royaume-Uni, d’Amérique, d’Espagne et du Danemark qui ont subi les conséquences des vaccinations contre le cancer du col de l'utérus - #HPV par le #Gardasil ou #Cervarix. …

👍15❤1👏1🙏1

4 Nov 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,130 views44 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @AileaStick

👇🧐 https://youtu.be/KoANBw37XGc En 2016, Mia a reçu le vaccin contre le HPV, le #Gardasil du laboratoire #Merck (vaccin contre le cancer du col de l’utérus), à l’école à l’âge de 12 ans. Conséquences : elle ne peut que cligner des yeux et parler. Elle est devenue incontinente et a des difficultés pour se nourrir. N'oubliez jamais : ➡️Les Bénéfices et l'immunité sont toujours pour #BigPharma. ➡️Les Risques, sont pour…

😱14🙏10👍6🤬5💔4😈2😭2❤1

4 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,390 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationVideo

Clemens Arvay s'exprimait fin sept. 2022 à l'antenne du Bild, sur le vaccin Covid aux essais "télescopés", les signaux d'effets secondaires négligés, et le mépris des patients souffrant d'effets secondaires graves De l'ironie et du mépris, il y en a à plusieurs niveaux, dans cette interview 😅 BILD est le journal quotidien le plus vendu en Allemagne et l'un des tabloïds les plus influents d’Europe. C'est un peu comm…

🙏20❤3👌2💯1😭1

25 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,750 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationPhoto

🎬 Réservez vos places - emmenez vos proches, amis, collègues, voisins ! Infos et réservations sur https://la-hype.ch/ Un film que chacun doit voir et revoir !

👍16❤1

13 Oct 2026, 19:03 UTC≈2,650 views39 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @AileaStickVideo

👇🤔Dans une interview datant de septembre 2022, Melissa Fleming, Sous-secrétaire à la communication mondiale des Nations Unies, explique comment lutter contre la désinformation en modelant la pensée collective avec l'aide des GAFAM. Autrement dit : « Nous possédons la science et le monde doit penser comme nous.» #WEF 🔗👇🔗#Climat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnarHXcGN8M

💩23🔥10🤬4💯1🖕1

11 Oct 2026, 05:06 UTC≈2,480 views41 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @espritdeverite

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CFBIcshpgA Plus le temps avance, plus ils sont nombreux à faire le même constat. Ian Carroll est un vidéaste américain très suivi qui décortique également le scandale Epstein depuis des années. Dans cette vidéo il s'est associé à Ryan Matta - un autre communicant très actif pour dénoncer les réseaux p*dos - pour réaliser ce documentaire qui complète favorablement notre vue d'ensemble…

🔥21💯8❤5👍4🙏2👎1

9 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,790 views33 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationVideo

Le rédacteur en chef du « Blick » appelle à un bilan de la crise du Covid Un appel urgent adressé au rédacteur en chef du Blick pour qu'il regarde le film « La Hype ». Source

👏28❤5

28 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,790 views28 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationPhoto

🎬 🎞️ Venez voir le film de Mike Wyniger, La Hype – 2020 revisitée, en français, avec vos proches au cinéma ! Pour Neuchâtel, vous pouvez déjà prendre vos places, pour les autres villes, réservez la date, des informations suivront. Site officiel : https://la-hype.ch/ pour toutes les infos ! GENÈVE - NEUCHÂTEL - VEVEY - LAUSANNE

👍17🙏8❤3

28 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC≈2,280 views29 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationVideo

Nous avons connu le terrorisme d’État pendant la pandémie de Covid – entretien avec Pirmin Schwander (interview de Mike Wyniger) Il est clair que, sans un véritable travail de réflexion sur la période de la pandémie, le terrorisme d’État peut resurgir à tout moment et que seul le Conseil fédéral décide quand il commence et quand il prend fin. 🎙️ Version doublée en 🇫🇷 📄 PDF de la traduction, pour les recherches ou …

👍24❤4👌1

27 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,130 views37 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Viv_publicationVideo

"Et maintenant, grâce à ce certificat, on peut montrer que l'on n'est pas contagieux." C'est ce qu'avait déclaré le 27 octobre 2021, le conseiller fédéral responsable de la santé, Alain Berset à la SRF. La page de la SRF qui affiche cette déclaration depuis cette date a ensuite été modifiée par un encart : "Précision La déclaration du conseiller fédéral Berset, lors d’une interview, selon laquelle "le certificat p…

🤮21💩8🔥3🤬3❤1🤡1

22 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC≈2,390 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @espritdeverite

Voici une vidéo réunissant quelques documents d'archive intéressants car ils permettent de faire une rétrospective sur les lignes politiques américaine et israélienne au Moyen Orient, avec la présence continue du Rebbe Menashem Mandel Schneerson. Ces pièces d'archives et témoignages permettent d'estimer certaines raisons de l'influence du Rebbe sur les dirigeants du Likoud, des États-Unis, ou quelques célèbres patro…

👍13🔥7❤4😘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @EquipeTopGun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CDS pour TOUS
@CDSpourTOUS · 32,203
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
Michel Dogna Officiel
@micheldognaofficiel · 21,887
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
RGNR - Nous c’est la Vie !
@rgnr_fr · 39,052
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Alexandra Henrion Caude️️️ ️️
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,871
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Radio-Québec
@radio_quebec · 41,355
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Bon Sens
@vivrecorrectement · 21,035
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Equipe Top Gun” (@EquipeTopGun), 8,138 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EquipeTopGun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.