Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 33 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,229–29,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:20
29,301
-21
15 Sept 2026, 12:39
29,322
-26
13 Sept 2026, 23:57
29,348
-20
12 Sept 2026, 06:21
29,368
-22
10 Sept 2026, 02:36
29,390
-59
6 Sept 2026, 16:19
29,449
-57
4 Sept 2026, 03:38
29,506
-16
2 Sept 2026, 16:39
29,522
-19
1 Sept 2026, 14:06
29,541
-19
31 Aug 2026, 12:03
29,560
-22
30 Aug 2026, 14:44
29,582
-24
29 Aug 2026, 17:43
29,606
-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:33
29,612
-18
27 Aug 2026, 18:46
29,630
-10
26 Aug 2026, 21:54
29,640
+2
25 Aug 2026, 23:07
29,638
+14
23 Aug 2026, 09:13
29,624
-15
21 Aug 2026, 17:49
29,639
-32
20 Aug 2026, 16:12
29,671
-27
19 Aug 2026, 14:18
29,698
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.76%
avg views ÷ 29,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
44 (13 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
76,960
Reactions total
2,337
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,810
Videos
≈383
Links
≈701
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 15s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,590 reactions across 44 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,327
64.8%
🔥
665
18.5%
👍
271
7.55%
🎉
94
2.62%
😍
88
2.45%
😢
43
1.20%
😁
42
1.17%
💯
32
0.891%
🤩
16
0.446%
👏
7
0.195%
🥰
5
0.139%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
2 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,690
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,670
over 42 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5wftH8N
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqM7otVP72cWz9D4J2ppSBPJyPZPUzVvhwh9dJ
1
22 September 2026
22 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В видео показала вам универсальные бюстгальтеры на каждый день, а вот фото пост получился очень томным ☺️
Я люблю кружевные комплекты за то ощущение, которое они дарят. Они менее универсальны, требуют определенного образа, но как же это красиво!
С тех пор, как я открыла для себя BLOOMBRA, изменилось мое отношение к телу, к белью, к ежедневному ритуалу одевания. Я даже полку в шкафу для бюстгальтеров организовала та…
Из-за изменившегося размера многие вещи и даже белье сидят на мне не так, как нужно.
Поэтому я решила к осени выбрать себе пару универсальных комплектов, и за этим пошла к любимым BLOOMBRA. Парой мы не ограничились 😁
Как обычно, отправила свои новые мерки, и спустя неделю распаковывала посылку с идеально подошедшими бюстгальтерами, трусиками и даже утяжкой!
Я не знаю, как консультанты BLOOMBRA это делают, но кажды…
У меня сегодня день рождения 🥳
И вот такую красоту я обнаружила в студии, когда пришла туда днем)
Теперь я счастливый обладатель архива журнала Yes! с 2004 по 2007 год. Именно на этих выпусках я выросла, сформировался мой вкус и даже подход к блогу ❤️
Я помню каждую съемку в этих выпусках.
Листала журналы и прослезилась.
Подарок от любимых подружек 🫶🏻
Любимые Randewoo выпустили классные новинки для подростков с первыми ароматами.
Эмилия и Тимур видят, что мы с мужем регулярно наносим парфюм, и просят их тоже попшикать) теперь у каждого своя коробочка с целым арсеналом на выбор.
Все ароматы легкие, свежие, уместные, как раз то, что нужно, чтобы познакомиться с миром запахов подростку. Но, если честно, я и сама туда ныряю: Flora Gorgeous Gardenia разблокировали мо…
Эфир был невероятным 🔥
Я сейчас практически не практикую как стилист, мне больше интересно жить реальную жизнь и интегрировать одежду в нее.
Но с 4FORMS у нас отдельная любовь и дружба. Они предложат мне с крыши прыгнуть, я пойду 😂
Была счастлива собрать свою капсулу. Тут подошла к вопросу опять через призму личного опыта и собрала образы, которые носила бы этой осенью сама. От отвезти детей в школу до свидания/ в…
Для тех, кто уже вернулся с шопинга домой — важная и приятная новость ☕️
Завтра в 11:00 | Смотреть тут
Мы будем ждать вас на прямом эфире
с другом бренда — Яной Бакировой 💋
Утро начнется с прекрасного общения — ждем ❤
Приехала в студию в воскресенье, потому что через пару часов проведу прямой эфир для любимых 4FORMS. Тема максимально практичная! Универсальный гардероб на осень: готовые образы от офиса до прогулок с детьми.
Никакого сложного стайлинга, только то, что можно реально надеть и пойти этой осенью.
А так как я не могу одновременно говорить и переодеваться, в кадре демонстрировать образы будет прекрасная Яна (да, модель …
Ну и раз тема зашла о еде, покажу, что готовила, а мои ребята ели на этой неделе.
Финская уха, конвертики из фарша и индейка с рисом. Это не все, в середине недели был суп с фрикадельками, и котлеты с солянкой, но красивых фото нет)
Можно взять как готовый план на следующую неделю.
Заказала на пробу новый вкус десерта Рекс-пай, я их очень люблю и часто вам показываю) мне нравится удобный формат упаковки по одной штучке, беру с собой и храню в студии, если хочется вкусняшку к кофе.
Такой формат пая беру уже второй раз. Классический очень вкусный, но этот с маракуйей просто нечто. Мягкий бисквит, тягучий маршмеллоу в середине и кусочки маракуйи внутри 😍
Только, в отличие от чокопая, здесь нет с…
Сентябрь в Хабаровске прекрасен. Лучший месяц в году!
Поэтому сегодня, пока ждала детей утром с филармонии, решила не сидеть, а пойти на пробежку по набережной.
С бегом у меня отношения не ровные, я бегаю всю жизнь, но в сильно большом весе, конечно, пропускала эту активность. Поэтому я здесь больше энтузиаст-любитель, и бегаю исключительно для своего удовольствия.
Пробежка в Хабаровске в сентябре - как раз такое …
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @yana_bakirova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Зольникова ходит, думает и пишет @allokreativ · 1,970#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Раздетый стилист Лена Червова @elennne_style · 101,022 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
СОНЕТА @sonn_etaa · 71,073 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 4 September 2026
Стилист для Плюс сайз @stylist_plus_size · 22,265 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
Подборки от Романовской @PODBORKI_PLUS_SIZE · 23,303 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 18 September 2026
Ксения Князева (стилист, дизайнер). О моде, стиле и преображении с юмором. @knyazeva_life · 37,785 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
Стилист Мария Милютина | Marimi @marimi_stile · 29,288 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 8 September 2026
Blue Unicorn @blueunicorn_ru · 33,291 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
ЛОСКУТОВА МАРИЯ @loskutova_maria · 93,129 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
у меня дома | in_myhome @in_myhome · 35,191 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 2 September 2026
nosachevastyle @nosachevastyle · 72,086 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
VIKISEWS PATTERNS | шей, твори, люби @patternsvikisews · 37,940 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЯНА БАКИРОВА | стиль и любовь к себе” (@yana_bakirova), 29,301 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yana_bakirova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.