Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -842. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,531–31,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:26
30,702
+7
5 Nov 2026, 21:00
30,695
-15
4 Nov 2026, 17:47
30,710
+12
3 Nov 2026, 19:16
30,698
+35
2 Nov 2026, 18:39
30,663
-15
1 Nov 2026, 17:46
30,678
-10
31 Oct 2026, 17:50
30,688
-10
30 Oct 2026, 17:09
30,698
-3
29 Oct 2026, 17:29
30,701
-20
28 Oct 2026, 14:38
30,721
-12
27 Oct 2026, 11:51
30,733
+5
26 Oct 2026, 13:06
30,728
+9
25 Oct 2026, 10:27
30,719
-5
24 Oct 2026, 07:06
30,724
-10
23 Oct 2026, 06:16
30,734
-16
22 Oct 2026, 06:59
30,750
-9
20 Oct 2026, 23:56
30,759
-7
19 Oct 2026, 20:35
30,766
-11
18 Oct 2026, 20:18
30,777
-12
17 Oct 2026, 16:51
30,789
first reading
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.07%
avg views ÷ 30,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
102 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
82,542
Reactions total
1,667
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 23:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,340
Videos
≈941
Links
≈3,820
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 20s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,095 reactions across 99 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,363
57.7%
🔥
1,017
24.8%
👍
439
10.7%
👌
93
2.27%
😁
76
1.86%
🥰
69
1.68%
🥴
38
0.928%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
11.8%
12 of 102 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
12
posts carrying an erid · 11 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,610
over 12 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,140
over 90 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanykEC1r3
2
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2Ranyks9eqq
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2RanynC8JFD
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2SDnjc792Qt
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
2SDnjcjFHKA
1
31 October 2026
31 October 2026
2SDnjcogat3
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2SDnjeTo2TM
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2SDnjeYKzvg
1
3 November 2026
3 November 2026
3apb1Qrvkg3QnCRp84ixMoF6TKxmY5CddV3MN14Rx4Euf
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
3apb1Qrvkg3QnCRs6V6CWS4hmoaUTDVdJt3SaqwFc7ADE
1
13 October 2026
13 October 2026
3apb1Qrvkg3QnCRtCvrLWXdQ6Ziu3NPMgGmEMwnYcVgMs
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Случился неожиданный шопинг. Влюбилась в этот комбинезон от Love Republic. Сел идеально. Для мероприятий люблю такие варианты иметь - и нарядно, и силуэт вытянут, и не нужно ломать голову над подходящим верхом или низом. Надела и пошла. Платья и комбинезоны в этом плане самые беспроблемные вещи.
Вы в комментариях пишите, что я мало ношу юбки и платья. Вот исправляюсь😀 очень полюбилась мне эта юбка от Elisa.and.me. Тут и женственность, и смешные кактусы с ковбоями. Принт не дает свалиться образу в рафинадную женственность. Отсюда универсальность модели - можно и с каблучками ее носить, и с казаками👌
Девочки, не забывайте забирать купоны у продавцов, они расположены в карточке товара👉после вкладки «характеристики».
У меня после применения всех скидок высвечивается «итого» за ботинки - 4553₽🥰
Вспомнила про эти ботинки, которые ношу до глубоких холодов, почти 3 года у меня живут. На Али брала, верх натуральная замша. Кто со мной активно шопился, наверняка помните бренд Beautoday? У них реально хорошая обувь, ей сносу нет. У меня несколько кед от бренда и две пары зимних ботинок.
Вот ссылочка на мои https://ali.click/o2mpp1x?erid=2SDnjc792Qt
На стопу 23,5 см размер 7 брала. Специально на размер больше, чт…
Редко нравится такой явно-женственный стиль, но это пальто покорило. Впервые увидела его на презентации бренда @letora_le, а сейчас оно на Lamoda появилось. 100% шерсть и выглядит, конечно, сногсшибательно.
Я тут в ночи на Алике сижу. Заказала себе:
Кардиган из шерсти мериноса
https://ali.click/cigkp1w?erid=2SDnjeYKzvg
Очки в металлической оправе и
https://ali.click/kmgkp18?erid=2SDnjf2VmHE
Кожаную сумку
https://ali.click/mdgkp1v?erid=2SDnjdmrNUL
8050₽ заплатила. Меня ИТОГО очень вдохновило. Заказ должен прийти на мой пункт ВБ, сто лет ничего не заказывала из Китая. Будем вместе распаковывать с вами посылку🥰
11.…
И под вечер иду опять с коктейлями 😂 Если вы живете в этих городах:
Санкт-Петербург, Волгоград, Уфа, Ялта, Казань, Сочи, Владивосток, Калининград, Краснодар, Ростов-на-Дону, Самара, Таганрог, Омск, Нижний Новгород, Пермь, Пятигорск, Пенза, Абрау-Дюрсо, Новосибирск, Екатеринбург, Балаклава, Ярославль, Саратов, Ижевск, Воронеж, Ставрополь и Москва.
И будете завтра в Москве, идите с паспортом в ресторан «Зарядье» (он …
На примере одной футболки покажу устаревшую и актуальную стилизацию.
Дело не в самой вещи, а в том, как ее носим. Часто мы берем классную вещь и загоняем ее в рамки «старых ГОСТов». В итоге вместо дорогой расслабленности получаем зажатый комплект без воздуха.
Главное правило современного стиля — носить вещи свободно, миксовать фактуры и создавать ощущение, что не потратили три часа на сборы👌
Сегодня-таки сдалась и пошла на сложное окрашивание в Москве, уже больше 6-ти месяцев не могу доехать до своего мастера. И не случилось. Колорист сделал тест-прядь, концы на прежде окрашенных, обломались сильно. Решили тонированием цвет облагородить и проф. уход Tokio Inkarami сделать (оно сейчас в топе во всех салонах), посмотрим, как сработает на осветленных прядях. Через месяц повторить и потом на сложное идти🤞А о…
Впервые за 5 лет сняла гель-лак с ног, ногти как салфеточка🙈
Решила дать отдохнуть ножкам до весны, буду только на гигиенический педикюр их водить. Девочки, у кого есть проверенное средство для укрепления ногтей, посоветуйте в комментариях🙌
Времена нынче диктуют здравый смысл. Переплачивать за баночки с красивой философией не модно. Серия для волос SYNERGETIC PRO EXPERT - идеальная рабочая база. 800₽ за две литровые банки! Спасибо, вам, ребята, за адекватность!
Шампунь промывает кожу головы идеально, при этом волосы свежие на следующий день и длина не стоит дыбом.
Кондиционер с биокератином и аминокомплексом убирает пух и дает накопительный эффект (ма…
Обзор на сумки с Ozon из натуральных материалов до 8000₽.
На их примерах заодно про тренды рассказала. Сумки приятные, под разные задачи.
Арт на модель с ремешкам: 2802839377
Арт на модель с клапаном: 3512453864
Арт на большую сумку: 2764267797
❤29👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @OksanaSamarina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @OksanaSamarina as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
29 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Соня Гельд. Просто. Элегантно. Со вкусом @soniageld · 40,989 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 August 2026
Канал о стиле Тани Компаненко @kompanenkotanya · 56,428 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026
Оксана Денисова - стилист @effectionlady · 29,724 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
Канал стилиста Iriglow @iriglowstyle · 45,418 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 28 August 2026
СТИЛИСТ JENNYHAET @jennyhaet · 46,020 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
Стилист для простых смертных @vavdeyukekaterina · 32,501 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
nosachevastyle @nosachevastyle · 70,906 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
Сокор по правде @sockor_po_pravde · 60,425 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
Lavrova Pro Style @lavrovaprostyle · 26,658 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Mihi Style @mihi_style_channel · 36,211 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 2 September 2026
АЛЕКСА ЕВДОКИМОВА @alexastylist · 36,511 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
juliaodevaet @Juliaodevaet · 33,366 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 October 2026
Стилист Жанна Тюрина @zhanna_dressme · 43,961 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 27 August 2026
Лена Балтина одевает 🛍️ @lenabaltina · 21,706 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 September 2026
Ксения Князева (стилист, дизайнер). О моде, стиле и преображении с юмором. @knyazeva_life · 37,389 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
Стилист Katia Kida | Катя Кида @stylistkatiakida · 23,539 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
Мода в капсуле | Образы | Стиль | Тренды @shoppingfyou · 32,425 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 September 2026
у меня дома | in_myhome @in_myhome · 35,157 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 2 September 2026
Раздетый стилист Лена Червова @elennne_style · 99,592 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
stylist.irina_ @stylist_irina13 · 45,051 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
kapsula_ready @kapsulaready · 32,084 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
Blue Unicorn @blueunicorn_ru · 33,003 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
STREET STYLE | Всё о стиле @streetstyle_looks · 31,566 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
ЛОСКУТОВА МАРИЯ @loskutova_maria · 92,046 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стилист Оксана Самарина” (@OksanaSamarina), 30,702 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OksanaSamarina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.