Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jane Boytsova

Channel

Jane Boytsova

@janeboytsova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,061subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745536653
TypeChannel
Username@janeboytsova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/janeboytsova

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0619,2039,1327 August 2026 — 9,203 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,203 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,199 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,191 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,180 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,161 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,155 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,136 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,126 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,119 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,123 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,105 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,097 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,086 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,061 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,040–9,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 03:589,061-25
17 Sept 2026, 13:029,086-11
13 Sept 2026, 04:009,097-8
9 Sept 2026, 05:359,105-18
3 Sept 2026, 12:209,123+4
31 Aug 2026, 17:049,119-7
28 Aug 2026, 20:379,126-10
25 Aug 2026, 20:049,136-19
22 Aug 2026, 14:029,155-6
19 Aug 2026, 11:069,161-19
16 Aug 2026, 16:069,180-11
13 Aug 2026, 07:539,191-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:149,199-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:009,203no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:569,203first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17070.0%
🔥3916.0%
❤‍🔥197.82%
😍83.29%
👍72.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC≈2,080 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Прогулялись сегодня по Летнему саду 🤍

❤52😍8❤‍🔥4👍3

19 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC≈2,300 views94 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Рандомные образы 🤍

❤69🔥19❤‍🔥6

17 Jun 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,070 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Новая рубрика «Находки из ТЦ» )

❤49🔥20❤‍🔥9👍4

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @janeboytsova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стилист для простых смертных
@vavdeyukekaterina · 33,114
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
СТИЛИСТ JENNYHAET
@jennyhaet · 46,753
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
kapsula_ready
@kapsulaready · 32,399
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
АЛЕКСА ЕВДОКИМОВА
@alexastylist · 37,159
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
Стилист Жанна Тюрина
@zhanna_dressme · 44,732
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 27 August 2026
Канал о стиле Тани Компаненко
@kompanenkotanya · 57,293
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026
Оксана Денисова - стилист
@effectionlady · 30,082
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
Стилист Katia Kida | Катя Кида
@stylistkatiakida · 23,805
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
Канал стилиста Iriglow
@iriglowstyle · 45,214
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 28 August 2026
stylist.irina_
@stylist_irina13 · 45,957
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
STREET STYLE | Всё о стиле
@streetstyle_looks · 31,955
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Стилист Катя Гершуни
@gershuni · 20,841
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 26 September 2026
Mihi Style
@mihi_style_channel · 35,911
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 2 September 2026
nosachevastyle
@nosachevastyle · 71,998
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
Anastasia_Parfenova
@anastasia_parfenova_stylist · 31,111
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 6 September 2026
Blue Unicorn
@blueunicorn_ru · 33,243
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Лена Балтина одевает 🛍️
@lenabaltina · 22,089
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 September 2026
Стилист Оксана Самарина
@OksanaSamarina · 30,987
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jane Boytsova” (@janeboytsova), 9,061 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janeboytsova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.