Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Парикмахер вещает @push_dish

Channel

Парикмахер вещает @push_dish

@DianaPushkova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,483subscribers

-543 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486013666
TypeChannel
Username@DianaPushkova
DescriptionБлог парикмахера про уход за волосами! Полезные посты в закрепе! https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67c986f6d0f339346a66d238
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DianaPushkova

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,24631,03830,6427 August 2026 — 31,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,026 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,038 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,010 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,993 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,975 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,940 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,914 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,877 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,847 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,822 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,807 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,773 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,740 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,701 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,678 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,652 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,607 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,549 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,507 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,491 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,449 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,399 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,341 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,246 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,270 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,318 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,325 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,394 subscribers25 September 2026 — 30,483 subscribers30,4837 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net -543. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,127–31,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:4030,483+89
17 Sept 2026, 10:4130,394+69
15 Sept 2026, 12:0130,325+7
13 Sept 2026, 18:0030,318+48
11 Sept 2026, 21:3930,270+24
9 Sept 2026, 12:1530,246-95
6 Sept 2026, 06:3830,341-58
4 Sept 2026, 03:5530,399-50
2 Sept 2026, 16:4430,449-42
1 Sept 2026, 12:3230,491-16
31 Aug 2026, 12:5530,507-42
30 Aug 2026, 10:1330,549-23
29 Aug 2026, 07:0230,572-35
28 Aug 2026, 07:4930,607-22
27 Aug 2026, 06:3830,629-23
26 Aug 2026, 04:5430,652-26
25 Aug 2026, 06:5130,678-23
24 Aug 2026, 04:5830,701-39
22 Aug 2026, 10:2430,740-33
21 Aug 2026, 00:0330,773first reading

Engagement

222 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.41%
avg views ÷ 30,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 222 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 87 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held222 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total90,507
Reactions total1,528
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 05:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,010
Videos
≈1,480
Links
≈991

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,799 reactions across 213 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,21484.6%
👍2195.76%
👏1443.79%
💔1253.29%
🥰651.71%
😍320.842%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 214 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 11:14 UTC766 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Voice message

Делюсь честно когда я увидела у мужу залысину и что я подумала в самый первый момент! Очень честна с вами Что может мужчин тревожить, а что наоборот их особо не волнует и что они НЕ готовы делать самостоятельно И конечно мой опыт что чаще всего делают мужчины, исходя из того с чем ко мне приходят девушки и что пишут в комментариях ЧТО ПОМОГАЕТ ОТ ВЫПАДЕНИЯ МУЖЧИНАМ? Рассказала тоже в подкасте 👆🏻

❤2

29 Sept 2026, 10:33 UTC797 views5 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

PUSH UP — тот случай, когда мне не нужно долго доказывать, что средство работает 😄 Потому что у меня есть результаты — мои, ваши и теперь ещё мужа + есть исследования на наш лосьон! У мужа не было никаких дополнительных процедур, препаратов и сложных схем — только наш лосьон, да и то нерегулярно Но даже при таком использовании результат уже заметный ❤️ PUSH UP — это не один модный актив в красивой банке, а многок…

❤5

29 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC723 views15 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Результат от лосьона на муже за 4 месяца НЕРЕГУЛЯРНОГО использования ‼️ И это важно Не неделя.Не месяц.А 16 недель. Сейчас выглядит так. Согласитесь, стало гораздо лучше? Уже нет такого ярко выраженного «островка» без волос Естественно, у трихолога он не был 😄 Но я думаю, ради бренда мы его туда всё-таки доведём — уже интересно отслеживать результат под трихоскопом и понимать, что происходит объективно При этом …

❤14👍1

29 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC828 views10 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Лысеть он начал примерно в 31 год, и ему на это абсолютно ПОХ 😂 Мой Водолейка вообще никак не смущается Мужчины в целом очень разные: 🔺 кто-то каждое утро укладывает волосы феном 🔺 а кто-то, как мой, стрижётся покороче, чтобы помыл — и готов 😂 И вот заставить мужчину каждый день мазать лысину лосьоном — отдельный квест. Я очень часто слышу от девушек: «моего не заставишь» Поэтому у нас всё просто: я поставила ему…

❤10

29 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC990 views4 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Хейтеры добрались до моего мужа 😂 Ну а что, пора … Чтобы вы понимали, в отзывах на WB написали примерно следующее: «Если ваши средства действительно такие хорошие, почему тогда у вашего мужа лысина?» И я даже не знаю, что здесь отвечать 😄

❤4

28 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC≈1,150 views35 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Иногда мне пишут: «Ну Clarins — это БРЕНД, а у вас что?» 😄 А я всегда думаю: известность бренда ≠ автоматически лучший состав Да, мы не гигант с рекламой на ТВ и у всех блогеров. Мы обычная команда, которая очень долго мечтала делать эффективные формулы, сильные активы и средства под конкретные задачи волос Сейчас у нас это получается и к этому добавляются ещё и исследования на готовые продукты! И для меня лично …

❤29👏6

28 Sept 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,030 views22 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤19👏3

28 Sept 2026, 11:39 UTC995 views18 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

РАЗБОР CLARINS для волос…. Шампунь 3.900 рублей за 200 мл ! Что имеем ? Хороший базовый достаточно мягкий шампунь.Уникальный? Нет.Просто БАЗА Кондиционер 4400 рублей за 200 мл ! Базовый жирный кондиционер.Не подойдёт тонким волосам,утяжелит.Действительно без силиконов.Но не вижу в этом ничего хорошего честно говоря,потому что они нужны нашим волосам,чтобы давать визуал + удерживать влагу в волосах ! Очень очень дор…

❤18

28 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC832 views5 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

CLARINS HAIR THERAPY — разбираю сыворотку для кожи головы за 5100 рублей Объём — 50 мл. Заявлена как средство для сокращения выпадения, укрепления волос и повышения густоты Состав: Aqua, Alcohol, Propanediol, Glycerin, Niacinamide, Panthenol, PPG-26-Buteth-26, PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil, Ethylhexylglycerin, Parfum, Cassia Alata Leaf Extract, Zinc Gluconate, Phenoxyethanol, Citric Acid, Linalool, Iris Florentin…

👍5

28 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC961 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

СОБЧАК конечно красиво рассказывает, но как жаль, что это неправда 😡 В рекламе отдельно подчёркивают, что, например, во всей линейке и в том числе в масле нет силиконов И меня это сразу зацепило, потому что косметическое масло для волос в большинстве случаев как раз и строится на силиконовой базе — и в этом НЕТ ничего плохого Потому что его основная задача — дать: блеск, гладкость, защиту, меньше трения, более соб…

💔12👏4

28 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC948 viewsread 30 September 2026

Интересно посмотреть разбор средств . Если честно впервые вижу,что они выпустили линейку для волос. Почему то мне кажется,что состав окажется недостаточно хорош для данной ценовой категории . Ждем 🩷

28 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

НОВАЯ ЛИНЕЙКА СРЕДСТВ от Clarins — что внутри и стоит ли она того? В линейке есть: — шампунь — сыворотка для кожи головы против выпадения и для поддержки роста — маска для волос — разглаживающий кондиционер — масло для длины Позиционирование, конечно, очень красивое: «hair therapy», укрепление, гладкость, блеск, работа с кожей головы и качеством волос Но цены там тоже соответствующие, поэтому хочу посмотреть соста…

👏10❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @DianaPushkova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DianaPushkova edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼‍♀️
@vaksiktyt · 62,927
#1
Волосы и уход за ними @pavlova_beauty_blog
@pavlova_beauty_blog1 · 4,676
#2
Annabel_haircare
@annabel_haircare_blog · 235
#3
Уход за волосами - MVBEAUTYHAIR
@mvbeautyhair · 9,410
#4
Polikova Beauty|Юлия Полякова
@polikova_beauty · 8,003
#5
Волосотека 📚
@volosoteka · 2,844
#6
Lab.Vera
@beauty_blogers · 53,701
#7
𝚇𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚊 𝙿𝚛𝚘 𝙷𝚊𝚒𝚛
@keratinbabe · 3,050
#8
Записки косметического трихолога
@ks_prohair · 4,403
#9
Мне только кончики
@kkkmarya · 24,242
#10
Екатерина Гребенко
@kategrebenko · 25,053
#11
Марафет
@violettavolos · 9,016
#12
Твоя Эрия
@youreriaa · 4,738
#13
бьютиблогово
@vakhrameeva_l_beauty · 14,915
#14
Переверни этикетку
@kreavs · 7,062
#15
Katyaspivak
@spivakkatyaa · 29,071
#16
Трихолог Копытина Виталия
@VitaKopytina · 13,368
#17
Лизавета в стране волОс
@lizzzivetta · 4,349
#18
Бьютифак
@beautyfuck · 10,020
#19
Beauty Hair Seville
@seville_hairs · 1,345
#20
Легко о косметике
@prokosmetyku · 9,717
#21
Lera – hair girl ✨
@hair_girl · 2,020
#22
BEAUTY HUB
@immelybeauty · 23,495
#23
Koroleva_Daily
@katekorolevaaa · 5,421
#24
ANANASSKIN🧴PRO КОЖУ И УХОД
@ananasskin · 35,032
#25
Химия Волос
@chemistryhair · 6,850
#26
Стабильно Аня Новикова
@hairismywears · 10,859
#27
Елагина про уход
@alina_elaginatg · 851
#28
Ястребова Лера ❤️
@berezhno_salon · 657
#29
Анатомия красоты
@beautyanatomya · 16,267
#30
Красота | Бьюти Мышь🤫🐭
@apriorimakeupp · 25,551
#31
Мария Милли | Дерматолог
@mariiamilli · 10,633
#32
Territory for girls🧚🏻‍♂️
@diana_mood7 · 38,297
#33
ChemCream
@chemcream · 20,039
#34
Волосатая тема 🧬
@tataris · 11,512
#35
Девичник у Вики
@vika_zhinkina · 28,706
#36
Staslaska
@staslaska · 7,812
#37
Взгляд химика на крем
@Lenaprokosmetiku · 52,355
#38
Доктор Кохас
@doctorkokhas · 318
#39
Nathairmagnat
@nathairmagnat2 · 2,532
#40
BEAUTY BY GUBICHM
@gubichmmmmm · 24,875
#41
Красивые волосы -это просто
@tvolosovaa · 608
#42
бьютисóфия
@beautysophia · 19,368
#43
Максимова о Бьюти
@margomaksimova · 2,927
#44
Дарина Pro Волосы
@darina_blonda · 1,979
#45
Мария | Тритментолог про волосы
@marimossooprovolosy · 1,902
#46
Ди про бьюти💅🏻🫧
@margaryandimusic · 20,868
#47
ТОЛЬКО (НЕ) НА ЛИЦО
@kravtz_cosmetology · 32,659
#48
Valentina.you
@valentinayoutg · 1,399
#49
ИНКУБАТОР ВОЛОС
@clubvolos · 3,187
#50
Gagarina • Ближе к природе
@gagarinamaria · 1,351
#51
ALEXSKIN community — сообщество бренда ALEXSKIN
@alexskin_community · 4,176
#52
Мурчание Эли
@aiwaska9 · 4,158
#53
Анастасия Григина. nasty__chill
@nastychill · 396
#54
Ананда | амбассадор блонда
@wellforself · 7,391
#55
more_science_inbeauty
@cosmeticsinsider · 4,876
#56
Алекс Веселова
@aleks_veselova · 12,772
#57
Наталья Куган | Трихолог Эндокринолог Москва
@nataliakugan · 6,908
#58
ALENA YUSHINA • FITNESS
@alenayushina_fit · 1,187
#59
Косметолог Нурматова
@nurmatovacosmetolog · 2,024
#60
NADYA ZOLOTO 💎
@nadya_zoloto · 1,164
#61
Алиса и Чемодан впечатлений 🧳✈️
@LisLisTravel · 1,581
#62
SEKTA | Спартак
@sektamotivation · 31,860
#63
КОРОЛЕВА О ПРОДАЖАХ
@korolevanatali19 · 474
#64
Оля Титова • коуч самозанятых
@olechkatitovaa · 254
#65
Кудрявый эксперт по домашнему восстановлению волос ‼️
@prowolos34 · 83 (as read 7 September 2026)
#66
ЛАЙМ ТРЕВЕЛ 🍋‍🟩 ТУРАГЕНТСТВО
@limetravelsamara · 1,102
#67
🧁Гайды КР🧁
@alisonwood_kr · 251
#68
STYLE BY ALENARESH
@stylebyalenaresh · 59,574
#69
Винокуров Онлайн
@vinokurov_online · 516
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼‍♀️
@vaksiktyt · 62,927
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Девичник у Вики
@vika_zhinkina · 28,706
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 9 September 2026
Екатерина Гребенко
@kategrebenko · 25,053
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Lab.Vera
@beauty_blogers · 53,701
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Katyaspivak
@spivakkatyaa · 29,071
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Парикмахер вещает @push_dish” (@DianaPushkova), 30,483 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DianaPushkova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.