Channel
@tu_crypto_news
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,084subscribers
-557 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002184223437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tu_crypto_news |
| Description | 🚀 Будьте в курсе всех важных крипто-новостей с командой ведущих журналистов Traders Union💰 ➡️ По вопросам партнерства @tu_partnership ❗️Любая информация в данном канале не является инвестиционным советом. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tu_crypto_news |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 52,084 | -86 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 52,170 | -56 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 52,226 | -112 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 52,338 | -50 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 52,388 | -60 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 52,448 | -61 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 52,509 | -37 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 52,546 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 52,590 | -51 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 52,641 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 52,641 | first reading |
67 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,975 |
| Reactions total | 131 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
131 reactions across 67 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91 | 69.5% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Strategy продала акции на $334 млн Strategy продала акции MSTR на $334 млн и не покупала биткоин с 10 по 16 августа. 📊 Компания сохранила 840447 BTC и увеличила долларовый резерв до $4,8 млрд. Новая модель Strategy уже допускает продажу біткоина при необходимости.
❤1
🚀 Биткоин отскочил к $63700 BTC/USD вырос к $63500–63700 на фоне ослабления доллара и снижения ожиданий ужесточения ФРС. 📉 Импульс остается слабым, а рынок сдерживают оттоки из спотовых Bitcoin ETF в США. Прорыв выше $64400 может открыть путь к $65000.
👏2❤1
🔥 World Liberty под огнём вопросов World Liberty связали с гонконгской платформой WorldClaw, продающей китайские ИИ-модели. 📊 Reuters выявил 43 китайские модели, включая решения Alibaba, Baidu и Z.ai. Партнёрство усилило споры о конфликте между политикой США и бизнес-интересами семьи Трампа.
👍2
🔥 ADA у ключевой поддержки Cardano после 10 дней падения тестирует 50-дневную SMA около $0,172. 📊 Активность экосистемы слаба, а TVL и объемы DEX почти не поддерживают спрос. При удержании зоны $0,172 возможен отскок к $0,184–0,188.
❤1
🔥 Ethereum зажат в диапазоне 17 августа Ethereum сохранил силу, но остался в диапазоне $1850–1950. 📊 Волатильность ETH упала до 1,25%, а ETF показали первый недельный отток после пяти недель притока. Чем дольше длится сжатие, тем резче может быть следующий пробой.
❤1
🔥 Chainalysis судится с правительством США Chainalysis подала иск к правительству США из-за контракта ICE на $94,6 млн для TRM Labs. 📊 Спор касается софта для блокчейн-аналитики в расследованиях Министерства внутренней безопасности США. Иск засекречен, а слушания по делу назначены на 2 сентября.
❤1
⚠️ 🚫 Binance режет связи с HTX Binance с 23 августа остановит транзакции с HTX и еще 10 криптоплатформами. 📊 Биржа предупредила о возможной заморозке средств и дополнительных комплаенс-проверках таких операций. Ограничения усиливают давление на сервисы, попавшие под санкции и регуляторный контроль.
❤3
‼️ Видеообзор главных новостей ✅ Утечка Trezor раскрыла данные 13 689 клиентов ✅ Криптокомпании требуют доступ к передовому ИИ для защиты ✅ Глава Delio получил 15 лет за криптомошенничество ✅ Glassnode не видит подтверждения дна биткоина ▶️ Смотреть на You Tube
❤2
🚨 MSCI может убрать Strategy Strategy и Metaplanet могут исключить из индексов MSCI по новым обсуждаемым правилам. 📉 JPMorgan ранее оценивал возможные пассивные оттоки для Strategy примерно в 2,8 миллиарда долларов. Итог консультации MSCI станет известен до 16 октября.
❤2
📉 BTC застрял ниже $64 000 В пятницу BTC/USD держится около $62 800, а отток из спотовых ETF мешает восстановлению. 💸 13 августа американские Bitcoin ETF потеряли $131,1 млн после оттока $61,1 млн днем ранее. Если притоки не вернутся, рынок может снова проверить поддержку $62 250.*
❤1
🔥 Cardano держится у важной поддержки Cardano удерживает уровень $0,181 на фоне слабой DeFi-активности и почти нулевых притоков капитала. 📊 TVL сети составляет около $67 млн, но суточный объем DEX остается низким. При защите $0,181 ADA может отскочить к $0,194, но нужен сильный внутренний катализатор.
❤1
🔥 ETH сжимается перед сильным движением ETH держится в диапазоне $1850–1950, а волатильность упала к минимумам середины мая. 📊 13 августа спотовые ETF на ETH в США получили лишь $6,7 млн чистого притока. Долгая консолидация часто заканчивается резким выходом цены из диапазона.
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @tu_crypto_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tu_crypto_news edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 211,490 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TU Crypto Новости” (@tu_crypto_news), 52,084 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tu_crypto_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.