Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MovieBlog 🎥

@themovieblogteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,121subscribers

+716 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001820971529
TypeChannel
Username@themovieblogteam
DescriptionТвой проводник в мир кино 🎬 По всем вопросам: @MagicalStarykh Реклама: telega.in/c/themovieblogteam Папка с нашими каналами: t.me/addlist/43QtSZ-YOtgyMzQ6 РКН: clck.ru/3FgpEz
Created10 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/themovieblogteam

Growth

32,40533,12132,7636 August 2026 — 32,405 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,605 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,652 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,852 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,022 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,121 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +716. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,298–33,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:5433,121+99
11 Aug 2026, 08:2333,022+170
10 Aug 2026, 07:3132,852+200
9 Aug 2026, 07:1332,652+10
8 Aug 2026, 07:3132,642+37
7 Aug 2026, 05:4032,605+200
6 Aug 2026, 17:1732,405first reading

Engagement

133 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 33,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,240
132 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
133
of 133 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held133 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total823,442
Reactions total24,568
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
53,100
Videos
187
Links
1,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34m 24s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24,568 reactions across 132 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,15333.2%
🤣4,58518.7%
custom 54493641519378381132,2359.10%
🔥2,1778.86%
custom 54519645699519689881,4235.79%
🤯9413.83%
custom 54498244865326210176712.73%
custom 52446734580837344075902.40%
custom 54521146704690327325502.24%
custom 54498185208230203745392.19%
😭4982.03%
🥴3141.28%
🌭3121.27%
🎉2811.14%
🍾2681.09%
custom 54565368504013439192150.875%
🏆1730.704%
💋1560.635%
👏880.358%
🫡850.346%
13 further kinds3141.28%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,568reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 132 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @themovieblogteam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 133 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC731 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый взгляд на персонажей 13 сезона «Американской истории ужасов» Премьера стартует 24 сентября!

🔥122🥴2🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC≈2,650 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

СЛУХ: HBO устраивает массовую зачистку телевизионного контента DC Джеймса Ганна По данным портала The Ankler, стриминг запретил производство сериалов «Уоллер» и «Потерянный рай» об амазонках Чудо-женщины. По тому же «Бустеру Голду» идёт поиск новых сценаристов, а судьба «Фонарей» будет решаться после выхода первого сезона. Скорее всего, ситуация в студии идентична той, которая сейчас происходит с Marvel. Кинокомикс

🤣97🤯86🔥5🏆1

12 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈5,030 views178 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В УОРНЕР БРАЗЕРС СИДЯТ ИДИОТЫ: лента «Хитрый койот» добилась восторгов от критиков Картина, от которой Warner Bros. в 2023 году отказалась ради списания убытков, оказалась очень удачной смесью комедии, живого кино и анимации, которая с неожиданной теплотой переносит легендарный дух вселенной Looney Tunes на большой экран. Фильм действительно забавный и смешной: здесь работают и физический юмор, и остроумные диалоги

🔥144🤣1912🤯2custom 54493641519378381131

12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈5,020 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

УРАААААА ДИНОЗАВРИКИ ЮХУУУУ: критики довольны лентой «На краю Оук-Стрит» с Энн Хэтэуэй и Юэном Макгрегором Картина представляет из себя эффектный и бодрый блокбастер, который удачно сочетает в себе и семейную драму, и хоррор, и приключения в духе классических фильмов 80-х. В ней много зрелищных сцен, чёрного юмора, саспенса и впечатляющих визуалом динозавров, а актёрская игра Хэтэуэй заметно усиливает общую эмоциона

53🥴10🍾7🤣2

12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈5,530 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сэму Джексону и Еве Грин уже плевать в чём сниматься: дебютный трейлер ленты «Сыграть в ящик» от Мартина Кэмпбелла («Казино Рояль», «Зелёный Фонарь», «Иностранец») Джек планирует инсценировать собственную смерть, чтобы получить страховую выплату в 30 миллионов долларов. Соучастницей в этой афере становится его жена Нора, но у неё другой план: убить Джека на самом деле. Премьера в РФ — 3 сентября.

🥴425custom 54493641519378381135custom 54519645699519689884

12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,720 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Мужик зажарился: Уолтон Гоггинс встречает фанатов на съёмках третьего сезона Fallout

118🔥27👏11🙊3

12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈5,660 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

СТИЛЬ: персонажные постеры боевика «Натиск» от Адама Вингарда и A24 Российская премьера состоится 17 сентября!

🔥57custom 54519645699519689886custom 544982448653262101743

12 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈5,600 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

37custom 545196456995196898834🌭3🔥1🥴1

12 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈5,630 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Специальный рекламный ролик в придачу Режиссёром выступил Барри Дженкинс («Король Лев», «Лунный свет»).

54custom 545211467046903273233🌭5🤯3custom 54519645699519689882

12 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈5,660 views232 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самая любимая актриса канала: Зендея в новой рекламе Prada Beauty ❤️

custom 545211467046903273211096🙊8🔥7custom 54519645699519689885🌭4💅2

12 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,780 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЗДЕСЬ БУДЕТ ГОЛАЯ САМАРА УИВИНГ: в 19:00 по мск начинаю смотреть в вашей компании второй сезон «Людей Икс '97» Приходите на Твич: www.twitch.tv/magicalstarykh www.twitch.tv/magicalstarykh www.twitch.tv/magicalstarykh

🤯44custom 544936415193783811316🥴6custom 545196456995196898851custom 54498244865326210171custom 54521146704690327321

12 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,940 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Полтора зрителя «Ричера» в восторге: трейлер сериала «Нигли» от Prime Video, спин-оффа шоу с Аланом Ритчсоном Фрэнсис Нигли покинула команду Джека Ричера и стала частным детективом в Чикаго, используя весь свой боевой опыт, полученный во время сложных и опасных операций. Однажды она узнает, что её давний друг погиб при странных обстоятельствах. Героиня решает провести собственное расследование и разобраться, что же

28custom 545196456995196898818🤣11🔥1🤯1🙊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @themovieblogteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@themovieblogteam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 29,141 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CherevatBlog
@cherevatstreams · 152,087
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MovieBlog 🎥” (@themovieblogteam), 33,121 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themovieblogteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.