Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cosmic Origin

Channel

Cosmic Origin

@cosmicorigin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,023subscribers

+150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001223407123
TypeChannel
Username@cosmicorigin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cosmicorigin

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

7,710 average views per post against 7,010 subscribers — an engagement rate of 109.9%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled161,850
Mature posts only117.6% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,010 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1%
Position in cohort99.469th percentile · 8.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.055% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,8737,0236,9487 August 2026 — 6,873 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,873 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,882 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,884 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,889 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,893 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,899 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,910 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,931 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,938 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,937 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,954 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,969 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,970 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,973 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,962 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,965 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,986 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,990 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,005 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,002 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,010 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,019 subscribers11 November 2026 — 7,023 subscribers7 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,851–7,046 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 22:197,023+4
8 Nov 2026, 09:447,019+9
5 Nov 2026, 06:597,010+8
2 Nov 2026, 06:577,002-3
30 Oct 2026, 05:517,005+15
27 Oct 2026, 09:346,990+4
24 Oct 2026, 14:066,986+21
21 Oct 2026, 22:476,965+3
18 Oct 2026, 14:556,962-11
15 Oct 2026, 06:446,973+3
12 Oct 2026, 07:166,970+1
5 Oct 2026, 19:186,969+15
28 Sept 2026, 00:596,954+17
15 Sept 2026, 15:386,937-1
12 Sept 2026, 07:176,938+7
7 Sept 2026, 21:016,931+21
2 Sept 2026, 17:446,910+2
30 Aug 2026, 15:196,908+9
24 Aug 2026, 14:266,899+6
20 Aug 2026, 23:546,893first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.8%
avg views ÷ 7,023 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,780
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held55 (30 June 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total225,620
Reactions total5,899
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 40s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,680 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54631215721370222424,68340.1%
🫡1,67614.3%
custom 54654651940565256191,37811.8%
custom 54634122898833534041,25010.7%
😭1,24510.7%
🦄8757.49%
👨‍💻3022.59%
🗿2712.32%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,680 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 55 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cosmicorigin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (13.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC≈4,580 views290 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ни одного лишнего fps’ика: GTA VI будет идти в 30 кадрах и на базовой PS5, и на PS5 Pro — короче покупка прошки была фулл инвестицией в говно

custom 5463121572137022242241🫡36🦄11custom 54654651940565256192

10 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC≈4,660 views245 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

НУ ЧЕ ПАГНАЛИ

🦄149🫡53custom 546546519405652561921custom 54631215721370222428🗿7😭5👨‍💻2

9 Nov 2026, 17:32 UTC≈4,920 views146 reactions28 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Джеймса Ганна попросили с поста DC киношек — еще до выхода его главного хита «Джимми олсен против гориллы гродда»!

custom 5463121572137022242112custom 546546519405652561917😭14🦄3

7 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC≈6,600 views283 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Режиссер-сценарист фильма Godzilla Minus Zero сказал, что при постановке битв монстров вдохновлялся файтами своих котов. МОГУ ЕГО ПОНЯТЬ «Ну, у меня две кошки, — рассказал Ямадзаки IGN. — И в основном они очень милые и игривые друг с другом, но иногда мне кажется, что — не знаю, не переходят ли они черту между игрой и настоящей дракой. Когда я вижу, как два существа дерутся друг с другом, я обычно думаю о своих кошк…

custom 5463121572137022242210custom 546546519405652561946🦄25🫡2

7 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC≈5,400 views342 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🦄237custom 546546519405652561971custom 546312157213702224230🫡2😭2

6 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC≈5,730 views196 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В твиттере жоско паровозят #SaveMassEffect — кампанию по спасению BioWare и игры. В целом дело идет напористо: уже собрали 300k подписей под петицией, штативы строчат новости, канадские политики тоже подтягиваются и хайпуют на теме, короче норм. Но это все абсолютно лишено смысла, к счастью или сожалению. Сценария, при котором можно спасти Mass Effect, на данный момент не существует: EA проект не был нужен, и никто …

🫡141custom 546312157213702224221🦄12custom 54654651940565256199😭7🗿6

6 Nov 2026, 15:24 UTC≈5,360 views67 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @dtfbestPhoto

Дэвид Гейдер работает с Owlcat Games над The Expanse: Osiris Reborn — он отвечает за «отдельные элементы» повествования. Студия тем временем раскрыла нового исполнителя мужской версии главного героя и его близнеца. https://dtf.ru/games/5396897

🦄41custom 546546519405652561916custom 54631215721370222429👨‍💻1

5 Nov 2026, 22:44 UTC≈5,930 views215 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Не получилось продать жагуары через дайверсити 😏😏😏

custom 5465465194056525619148custom 546312157213702224259🦄8

5 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC≈6,030 views153 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Наткнулся на интересную статью про всеми нами любимый The Pitt. Оказывается, с 2024 года (еще до премьеры первого сезона) против Warner и творческой команды сериала, включая Ноа Уайли, был подан иск — женой Майкла Крайтона, создателя «Скорой помощи». Претензия — нарушение «замороженных авторских прав». Типо никто не имел права делать сиквелы, приквелы, спин-оффы, ребуты «Скорой помощи» без личного одобрения Крайтона …

😭118🦄16custom 546312157213702224211🫡6🗿2

5 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈6,720 views277 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Это из нового сезона Edgerunners?

custom 5463121572137022242240🫡22😭10👨‍💻2🗿2custom 54654651940565256191

4 Nov 2026, 23:19 UTC≈6,170 views208 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5463121572137022242200🗿6🦄2

4 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC≈7,000 views79 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Перед выходом гта 6 немного думаю в сторону нового ГЭЙМЕРСКОГО монитора. Чтобы там оледы, хдры, спросил у грока что норм в среднем сегменте, он ответил Gigabyte GO27Q24A / MO27Q2A Что скажете, эксперты?

custom 546546519405652561959custom 546312157213702224215🗿4🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @cosmicorigin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

StopGame.ru - Игровые новости
@stopgamenews · 35,419
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
StopGame.ru
@stopgameru · 82,412
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cosmic Origin” (@cosmicorigin), 7,023 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmicorigin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.