Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BlexInfinity

Channel

BlexInfinity

@infinityblex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,909subscribers

+543 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001595895281
TypeChannel
Username@infinityblex
DescriptionАпогей идиотии Связь @blexinfinity Реклама: https://telega.in/c/infinityblex
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/infinityblex

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3666,9096,637.56 August 2026 — 6,366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,369 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,395 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,414 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,456 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,468 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,535 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,550 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,556 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,572 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,586 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,595 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,618 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,634 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,675 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,709 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,743 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,748 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,763 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,769 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,777 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,769 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,777 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,778 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,794 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,909 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +543. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,285–6,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 21:566,909+115
5 Nov 2026, 16:446,794+16
2 Nov 2026, 13:006,778+1
30 Oct 2026, 04:016,777+8
26 Oct 2026, 20:176,769-8
24 Oct 2026, 03:196,777+8
21 Oct 2026, 11:466,769+6
18 Oct 2026, 18:386,763+15
15 Oct 2026, 13:446,748+5
12 Oct 2026, 05:216,743+34
5 Oct 2026, 23:416,709+34
28 Sept 2026, 10:166,675+41
18 Sept 2026, 13:396,634+16
14 Sept 2026, 00:406,618+23
9 Sept 2026, 20:576,595+9
4 Sept 2026, 20:376,586+14
1 Sept 2026, 03:576,572+16
29 Aug 2026, 09:376,556+6
26 Aug 2026, 12:446,550+15
23 Aug 2026, 08:096,535first reading

Engagement

130 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.2%
avg views ÷ 6,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,330
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 130 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held130 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total458,490
Reactions total16,144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,600
Videos
≈256
Links
≈3,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

23,109 reactions across 129 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,40932.1%
🤣4,41019.1%
🔥2,1619.35%
😁2,0248.76%
🤡1,5786.83%
😭1,3735.94%
👍1,2585.44%
❤‍🔥4351.88%
💩3291.42%
🥰2921.26%
🤯2341.01%
😈2020.874%
🥱1980.857%
😢1900.822%
🖕1730.749%
🤔1020.441%
👌910.394%
🍌690.299%
🤮630.273%
😴520.225%
34 further kinds4662.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 129 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @infinityblex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 130 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.769%
1 of 130 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,630
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,890
over 128 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGDbgAE14 November 20264 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 87 posts held from the last 30 days (11.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,440 views136 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

ЛАДНО ПРОЩАЕМ ГИКИ. ОТСТАВИТЬ ОПЕРАЦИЮ.

❤97😁31🥰5🤡2🖕1

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,850 views127 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

АРЧИДОС ИДИ НАХУЙ ГИК НОВОСТИ ПОДПИСЫВАЕМСЯ

❤94🔥15🙏9😁7🖕2

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,830 views32 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Смотрю фильм Побег из Претории, обсуждаем последние новости - https://www.twitch.tv/blexinfinity сегодня без завозов ребят, набираю энергию

🔥28❤3🤡1

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,780 views256 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Вот такое прислали со стрима друга канала Арроувудса. Не имел вообще ничего против, но видимо чет ахуел мужик этот Арчидос в край такую хуйню писать. Ведь каждый в этом канале знает, что я и копейки не потрачу на такую хуйню ебаную. Все репосты были сделаны по доброте душевной моих добрых друзей гиков, которых я не просто знаю, а с которыми я регулярно общаюсь и делаю коллабы. Данечка Квен вообще 6 постов на доброво…

❤218🤣29🤡6👍3

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈3,270 views387 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Построил

🤣306😢57❤‍🔥11🤡5🤓3❤2😁2👏1

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC≈4,240 views221 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Бля жаль в фильме таких кадров не будет, тогда мб 9 можно было бы натянуть....

😭188🤡14❤‍🔥9🤣6❤3🍌1

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈4,350 views352 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Хочу обратиться к MAD (своему зрилу которому). Бля мужик ты уже там в долги влез или чо там ради этих мем алертов везде и донатов, бля харе нахуй наверно, а то пиздец я себя неловко чувствую, я бы тебе все кредиты погасил бы будь я мелстроем, но увы. Спасибо за такой актив, реально ебашим, но надо и о себе родном любимом думать. Для всех остальных. В мужскую битву за слот мы влетим конечно, иначе меня просто ссыкло…

❤307🔥18💅9🤣6👍5🤡5👎1💩1

Signed Yury

10 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC≈4,450 views37 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Про фильм Деньги на Двоих (5/10)

🔥25👍4🤡4❤3😁1

Signed Yury

9 Nov 2026, 23:28 UTC≈5,320 views207 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

Два Мега Мега было пройдено за стрим… напомнило чем-то Капхед, такой доисторический. Шарм серии примерно выкупил и понимаю почему у нее до сих куча ебнутых фанатиков из-за которых Капком 40 лет одинаковые игры делают

👍163❤25✍11🤡7💔1

Signed Yury

9 Nov 2026, 21:08 UTC≈5,780 views533 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

SON

😁310😢127😭53🤣13🫡12🤡7❤4👍3

Signed Yury

9 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC≈5,550 views98 reactionsread 10 November 2026

ИГРАЮ В МЕГА МЕН 2 СЕЙЧАС - https://www.twitch.tv/blexinfinity

❤61🤣25🤡8😱3😭1

Signed Yury

9 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC≈4,700 views296 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Что, если…?

🤣264😁13🙏7🤡6👍2🔥2😎2

Signed Yury

Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @infinityblex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@infinityblex edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 November 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @infinityblex as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
33 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,720 voters approx.

Куда выкладывать ролик

  1. На Eternity51%
  2. На Infinity56%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Qewbite
@Qewbite · 73,386
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
ZED
@ZEDTimeToWakeUp · 20,125
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026
MovieBlog 🎥
@themovieblogteam · 34,020
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
МемБлог 🫪
@memeblogteam · 26,167
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
DailyBlog
@thedailyblogteam · 33,242
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Гиковский Вестник
@QewbsNews · 45,649
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
FANDOM MARVEL/DC
@marvel_dc_f · 21,208
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Marvel Rivals | Новости • Утечки
@marvelrivals_rus · 35,096
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
КультасLIVE
@kultas_live · 31,648
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
Котокраб
@Kotokrabs · 35,795
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
hypewave
@hypewave · 55,417
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
SonnyK
@sonnyk1997 · 44,313
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
ПОКВМ | Человек-Паук: Новый день
@PokvmOf · 32,092
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
Кино Огонь
@kinoogon_official · 27,185
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlexInfinity” (@infinityblex), 6,909 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infinityblex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.