Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тупи40k Г.Аллина (по читать)

@mcabaret

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002186855352
TypeChannel
Username@mcabaret
DescriptionЧай, сахар есть - и то хорошо
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mcabaret

Growth

1327 Aug 2026, 14:22 — 132 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:45 — 132 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:229 Aug 2026, 00:45
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:45132no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22132first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.8%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held14 (28 May 202616 July 2026)
Views total104
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,830
Videos
129
Links
315

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3836.9%
🔥2625.2%
👍1413.6%
🗿1211.7%
custom 527387215759042943743.88%
🤝43.88%
custom 527837017376031518532.91%
🆒21.94%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @themovieblogteamPhoto

ДЕД В СВОЁМ СТИЛЕ: Мэтт Дэймон вспомнил, как он встретился с Ридли Скоттом, чтобы отказаться от «Марсианина» Актёру показалось, что это слишком похоже на его роль в «Интерстелларе», где оба персонажа оказались отрезанными от мира в космосе. Ридли Скотт тут же сказал ему: «Да всем похуй!»

5

29 Jun 2026, 13:55 UTC174 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Слегка пропал. Июнь выдался невероятно тяжелым месяцем, пережил переезд и в принципе дал себе время на восстановление. Буду постепенно возвращаться к жизни. Тем более, что Хи-Мена посмотрел.

4👍4custom 52783701737603151853🔥1

5 Jun 2026, 21:18 UTC243 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

АААААААААААААААААААААААА

4🔥4

5 Jun 2026, 14:42 UTC203 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вот времена были: раньше в рамках реалити-шоу можно было навыебываться и вырубить человека, и это покажут по ТВ. Сейчас только 'полный выпуск смотрите в моем личном тг" Конечно, насилие осуждаем. Но вспоминать забавно. https://youtu.be/dQmQht4D-wg?si=JgPm5x2fFQ4ddUCp

custom 527387215759042943741

5 Jun 2026, 14:37 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня 20 лет исполняется культовому для целого поколения альбому "Blood, Sweat and Towers" от Towers of London! Дебютный альбом группы, быстрый буст популярности которой вызывает дискуссии и по сей день. Богатые родители братьев Турретов или просто востребованность медиа того времени в провокационных пьяных панк-рокерах? Ответ возможно где-то между. Тем не менее, дебютный альбом группы в ее золотом составе — это

5🔥4

5 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ади Шанкар окончательно сошел с ума и решил, что у него получился хороший "Devil May Cry".

2

5 Jun 2026, 12:08 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, те кто десяток лет назад смеялись над скринами комментов из одноклассников — сами превратились в посмешище нынешнего интернета со своими телегами в тредс.

👍42

4 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC142 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я знаю, что тут есть люди которые знают группу Celebrity Skin (и что это не только песня Hole), их мало, но они тут есть и сейчас охуеют: Так вот, хоть они и распались лет 30 лет назад, в 2020 они умудрились записать ЕР и молча выложить его на саундклауд. Вообще нигде об этом не рассказав. ВООБЩЕ. Я не знаю как и почему, но у меня ушло минут 20 чтобы точно уточнить, что это одна и та же группа. Настолько все, включа

🔥5🆒2

4 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я наконец прошел Death Stranding 2 и ушло на это больше месяца. Начинаю как обычно издалека — такой уж формат и я считаю он лучше помогает читателю понять автора и из чего его мнение растет. Так вот, я полюбил игры в эпоху PS2. Я не настолько молод, чтобы это была моя первая приставка конечно, но именно на ней я перестал воспринимать игры как "с дворовым корешем в драчки поиграть", а осознанно погружаться в игровые

🔥3

3 Jun 2026, 22:27 UTC92 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Клинт Иствуд завершил свою 70-летнюю карьеру в кино. Фактурный актер прошедший арку от крутого мужика до рефлексирующего повзрослевшего мужчины, своими руками переосмыслив жанр и свой же архетип сделавший его звездой. Самое интересное в Иствуде, что он превосходный режиссер. Причем режиссер опередивший своей время, ставивший во главе представителей угнетенных групп еще за десятки лет до того как это назовут повестк

🔥9👍6🤝4

1 Jun 2026, 23:49 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зак Снайдер снимает «Metal Gear»! Ну почти. Под руководством Джона Карпентера он снимает ремейк «Побега из Нью-Йорка», плохая новость в том, что сценаристом числится тоже Зак. Я не из тех кто считает Снайдера совсем печальным, у него действительно есть стиль и видение. Но у него есть большая личностная проблема: микс СДВГ и дислексии. Оба эти фактора не только широко известны, но и видны невооруженным взглядом, а г

5

1 Jun 2026, 10:57 UTC133 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рефн кажется возвращается в свой прайм и уже в следующем году выпустит свой ремейк "Маньяка-полицейского". С концептом ремейка он носился два десятилетия и вот оно срослось наконец. Видимо для Рефна это станет чем-то вроде "Франкенштейна" для Дель Торо. Ждем, благо недолго.

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mcabaret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 742,613 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тупи40k Г.Аллина (по читать)” (@mcabaret), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mcabaret.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.