33 часа в Control. Наигрался уже до тошнотки, а оно все продолжается без проседаний. Не могу решить, хорошо это или плохо 🤨
❤109custom 577379695345638172847💩26custom 58031887375128365539🤣4🌭2🤨1custom 51953570931078681511
Signed Aptyp Black
![Telegram profile photo for Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/e2/e2464fb456174ec44a81abf5a9ca77fc0760c9807d07cc3f5a2a8ff49b9af642.jpg)
Channel
@blackufa_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,510subscribers
+126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001703311199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blackufa_official |
| Description | Обитель прекрасных людей (и стримера) | Мой Twitch: twitch.tv/blackufa Паблик ВК: https://vk.com/b_silver Архив на YT: https://vk.cc/cIb5Gk РКН: https://vk.cc/cIb5cX |
| Created | 17 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blackufa_official |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 52,510 | +15 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 52,495 | +11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 52,484 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 52,492 | +33 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 52,459 | +10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 52,449 | +21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 52,428 | +19 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 52,409 | +21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 52,388 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 52,386 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:44 | 52,388 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 52,400 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 52,406 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 52,408 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 52,412 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 52,413 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 52,404 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 52,398 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 52,396 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 52,406 | first reading |
321 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 321 (2 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,833,900 |
| Reactions total | 350,977 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
536,722 reactions across 321 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 153,860 | 28.7% | |
| 😁 | 60,763 | 11.3% | |
| 💩 | 53,360 | 9.94% | |
| 🤣 | 50,228 | 9.36% | |
| custom 5363908854096601297 | 43,335 | 8.07% | |
| custom 5773796953456381728 | 34,675 | 6.46% | |
| custom 5886273028723051867 | 25,482 | 4.75% | |
| custom 5364137196032893587 | 22,698 | 4.23% | |
| custom 5195357093107868151 | 20,365 | 3.79% | |
| custom 5803188737512836553 | 14,492 | 2.70% | |
| 🔥 | 14,028 | 2.61% | |
| 😢 | 8,558 | 1.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6,780 | 1.26% | |
| 💯 | 4,718 | 0.879% | |
| 🤮 | 3,946 | 0.735% | |
| 😱 | 3,618 | 0.674% | |
| 🤯 | 2,862 | 0.533% | |
| 🤨 | 2,452 | 0.457% | |
| 🥰 | 1,914 | 0.357% | |
| 🤔 | 1,777 | 0.331% | |
| 9 further kinds | 6,811 | 1.27% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 321 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536,722 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 321 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
33 часа в Control. Наигрался уже до тошнотки, а оно все продолжается без проседаний. Не могу решить, хорошо это или плохо 🤨
❤109custom 577379695345638172847💩26custom 58031887375128365539🤣4🌭2🤨1custom 51953570931078681511
Signed Aptyp Black
Чаттерсы, сегодня без меня, плохо спал, да и вообще чёт за сентябрь 170+ часов стримов вышло, надо меньше стримить. Завтра играем в Аааню с Темой, выходит Gears of war: E-Day
❤1,080custom 5363908854096601297307custom 5773796953456381728147💩118🕊22😢20🤗16custom 536413719603289358713
Signed Aptyp Black
Хана вестибулярке
😁733custom 5773796953456381728214custom 536413719603289358786💩57🔥21❤15custom 519535709310786815113custom 580318873751283655311
Signed Aptyp Black
Video, posted without a caption
😁899custom 5773796953456381728122🤣97💩47❤18custom 53639088540966012978custom 53641371960328935878💯6
Signed Aptyp Black
Video, posted without a caption
custom 5773796953456381728670😁342🤣167💩37custom 536413719603289358720🤮8❤7😱7
Signed Aptyp Black
Норм освещение
custom 5773796953456381728452💩72custom 536413719603289358750custom 536390885409660129730😁25❤18🤮4🤣3
Signed Aptyp Black
Такс, ну не все потеряно. Но близко, эти люди ходят среди нас 👨🦳
😁654🤣182custom 5773796953456381728102custom 580318873751283655358💩49custom 536390885409660129713❤12custom 53641371960328935879
Signed Aptyp Black
Уже раз 😨
💩696🤣395custom 5773796953456381728149custom 519535709310786815142custom 536390885409660129720😁14custom 580318873751283655312❤7
Signed Aptyp Black
Posted without readable text
custom 5363908854096601297648custom 5773796953456381728266💩88custom 536413719603289358752🤣45custom 580318873751283655339❤16🌭7
Signed Aptyp Black
Неплохо посидели, пришло 7 тысяч человек (или ботов), что было несколько неожиданно. Ремастер пока (ПОКА) не рекомендую - картинка пересвеченая днём, сильно темная ночью и в помещениях. На удивление в Велене ситуация улучшилась, но в Белом Саду, во вступлении, и в Туссенте, куда мы заглянули оценить, было прям плохо. Плюс вырвиглазные, перекрученные цвета. Плюс игра на моем железе очень посредственно работает - без а…
❤911💩115custom 536390885409660129795custom 577379695345638172875🥰32custom 536413719603289358722🤨9🤮8
Signed Aptyp Black
Photo, posted without a caption
❤754custom 5773796953456381728353custom 536390885409660129792💩79🔥24🤣22custom 580318873751283655315🤮14
Signed Aptyp Black
14:00 МСК TWITCH.TV/BLACKUFA ВК: LIVE.VKVIDEO.RU/BLACKUFA Ну тогда договорились, сидим сегодня смотрим обновление на Ведьмака, вспоминаем-ностальгируем, а чат лутает дропсы для плотвы (дают за 90 минут просмотра)
custom 5363908854096601297750custom 5364137196032893587167❤120💩88custom 577379695345638172841custom 519535709310786815130🤮13❤🔥4
Signed Aptyp Black
Showing the 12 most recent of 321 posts we hold for @blackufa_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Смотрим обновленного ведьмака завтра?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
С Росомахой мы
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сегодня можем сходить в
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 321 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игровой Канал Блэка [BlackUFA] 🎮” (@blackufa_official), 52,510 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackufa_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.