10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,286–11,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:55
11,396
+11
14 Aug 2026, 15:34
11,385
+15
13 Aug 2026, 08:07
11,370
+4
12 Aug 2026, 06:52
11,366
+4
11 Aug 2026, 10:13
11,362
-5
10 Aug 2026, 07:30
11,367
+2
9 Aug 2026, 10:01
11,365
+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:46
11,363
+59
7 Aug 2026, 08:38
11,304
+4
6 Aug 2026, 13:33
11,300
first reading
Engagement
159 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 11,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,140
159 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
159
of 159 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
159 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
498,731
Reactions total
16,727
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 14s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,727 reactions across 158 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,680
34.0%
custom 5433856365061746058
3,417
20.4%
custom 5370712413005945913
2,242
13.4%
👎
1,440
8.61%
custom 5454383796180763700
1,257
7.51%
👍
1,230
7.35%
custom 5370959021438146805
513
3.07%
custom 5470166383654347072
290
1.73%
custom 5451832396628379533
276
1.65%
custom 5370757127910485287
224
1.34%
🏆
122
0.729%
custom 5357122032674818130
36
0.215%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 159 of the 159 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,727reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 159 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bluecityzens. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 159 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Продолжая тему по всем этим сделкам:
Один из подписчиков попытался узнать у Сэма Ли, что задерживает сделку по Буадди, на что журналист ответил коротко и ясно – Родри.
А Энцо Фернандес сегодня появился на поле в товарищеском матче за «Челси», получив смешанную реакцию от фанатов на «Стэмфорд Бридж»: одни его освистали, а вторые поаплодировали.
После игры Энцо дал полный круг почёта по «Бриджу».
@bluecityzens
Романо: «Барса» направила третий оффер по Родри и сохраняет уверенность в заключении сделки, а «Манчестер Сити» в свою очередь продолжает работать над финализацией сделки по Буадди, а также обсуждает возможность сделать предложение по Энцо Фернандесу, и продолжает контакты с представителями аргентинца.
@bluecityzens
Вторая часть материала, раскрывающая подробности проведенной предсезонной подготовки:
🛑Мареска долго ждал того, чтобы поприветствовать всю команду, ведь шесть человек вернулись только на этой неделе после отпуска из-за Чемпионата Мира. В связи с тем, что Родри уходит, итальянцу придется переформировывать лидерскую группу, в которой с прошлого года остались только Рубен Диаш и Эрлинг Холанд. Вопрос раздевалки пока ос…
Материал Джека Гохана о том, как Энцо Мареска уже оставил свой след в «Сити»: новые методы тренировок, новые лидеры, новые билд-апы, новые требования к своим вратарям и те же большие ожидания, что и у Пепа Гвардиолы:
🛑В раздевалке этим летом было очень много вопросов о переменах, перезагрузке и ожиданиях. Ожидания, пожалуй, стали главной темой размышлений. Даже в последние два сезона, когда команда находилась не в о…
Клуб продолжает скармливать нам отрывочки из документалки про Гвардиолу, которая выйдет уже через несколько дней, 19 августа.
Здесь показали, как Пеп репетировал свою прощальную речь, и заплакал на словах: «Вечными останутся чувства, люди, воспоминания и любовь, которую я испытываю к моему «Манчестер Сити».🥲
@bluecityzens
Романо тоже подтвердил, что «Сити» не отказался от идеи подписания Энцо, но теперь «Челси» контролирует всю ситуацию, включая условия сделки и ценник.
«Сити» продолжил контактировать с лагерем Фернандеса даже после истечения дедлайна.
@bluecityzens
К слову о Тавольери: Он тут пишет, что «Аль Хиляль» договорился с Педру Нету о контракте, а «Челси» готов продать португальца за 60 миллионов евро.
@bluecityzens
Бедолагу Романо опять слегка попустили, но уже косвенно: Под новостью про Харвуд-Беллиса Орнштейн сослался на Сашу Тавольери, на что тот в свою очередь ответил Орни то, что вы видите на скриншоте.😁
@bluecityzens
«Саутгемптон» отклонил оффер в 20 миллионов евро от «Бенфики» по Харвуд-Беллису, но готов продать защитника за более высокую цену.
Нам с любой сделки причитаются П Р О Ц Е Н Т И К И.
@bluecityzens
Алекс Крук: «Барселона» направила третий оффер по Родри на общую сумму в 60+ миллионов фунтов. Испанский клуб настроен оптимистично на завершение сделки.
@bluecityzens
Аргентинский журналист Гастон Эдул говорит по поводу ситуации с Энцо:
«Вопрос с Фернандесом и его будущим будет решён в ближайшее время. У «Челси» был установленный дедлайн, но всё это – вопрос переговоров. Для Энцо крайне важно играть в Лиге чемпионов; переговоры по личным условиям с «Манчестер Сити» продвигаются, и клуб готов потратить на него огромную сумму; переход Родри в «Барселону» напрямую связан с этой сдел…
Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @bluecityzens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто должен войти в лидерскую группу команды, помимо Рубена и Эрлинга:
Гвардиол и Фоден61%
Гвардиол и Гехи11%
Гехи и Фоден6%
Доннарумма и Фоден15%
Доннарумма и Гехи6%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,095 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Москвич – Индус | Васант, Мяч Production, футбол, кино, Tvari.agency @Vasantino · 117,586 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Фабрицио | Трансферы @fabrizio_transfery · 96,522 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
ФУТБОЛЬНИК @football_nik · 107,770 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Реальный Футбол LIVE @rflive · 235,325 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
МЯЧ Production @myachpro · 373,702 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Manchester City FC @manchester_city · 128,951 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
FC BARCELONA @newsbarca · 331,362 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Правильный Манчестер” (@bluecityzens), 11,396 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluecityzens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
