Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МЯЧ Family

Channel

МЯЧ Family

@myachfamily

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

36,907subscribers

+810 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002519140591
TypeChannel
Username@myachfamily
DescriptionСамый уютный канал из Вселенной МЯЧ Production! Дружим с Fonbet. № 7010901908
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/myachfamily

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

35,50837,01836,2636 August 2026 — 36,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,071 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,013 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,992 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,975 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,961 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,949 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,890 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,839 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,719 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,676 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,690 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,671 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,610 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,543 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,523 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,508 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,565 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,622 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,639 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,620 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,591 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,559 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,533 subscribers6 September 2026 — 35,764 subscribers9 September 2026 — 37,018 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,948 subscribers13 September 2026 — 36,953 subscribers15 September 2026 — 36,931 subscribers17 September 2026 — 36,907 subscribers36,9076 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +810. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,282–37,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:5936,907-24
15 Sept 2026, 15:5936,931-22
13 Sept 2026, 20:5736,953+5
12 Sept 2026, 03:1636,948-70
9 Sept 2026, 17:2137,018+1,254
6 Sept 2026, 07:4135,764+231
3 Sept 2026, 21:5835,533-26
2 Sept 2026, 15:2335,559-32
1 Sept 2026, 13:2535,591-29
31 Aug 2026, 09:5435,620-19
30 Aug 2026, 10:0835,639+17
29 Aug 2026, 09:3335,622+57
28 Aug 2026, 07:3635,565+57
27 Aug 2026, 04:2535,508-15
26 Aug 2026, 03:3435,523-20
25 Aug 2026, 03:1335,543-22
23 Aug 2026, 21:3435,565-45
22 Aug 2026, 02:2835,610-61
20 Aug 2026, 18:4435,671-19
19 Aug 2026, 20:2535,690first reading

Engagement

339 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.9%
avg views ÷ 36,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,100
207 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
207
of 339 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held339 (30 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total3,123,470
Reactions total117,989
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,140
Videos
261
Links
492

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 39s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

174,073 reactions across 331 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
64,42337.0%
😁41,93924.1%
🤣29,75117.1%
🔥11,4846.60%
👍7,9014.54%
👎3,5852.06%
👏2,9081.67%
❤‍🔥2,7491.58%
🤯1,5720.903%
😐1,3910.799%
💯1,2350.709%
🥰1,1530.662%
🤔5300.304%
🍌4580.263%
💔4260.245%
🥴3120.179%
🤬2470.142%
🎉2430.14%
🤓1280.074%
🥱1070.061%
42 further kinds1,5310.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 339 of the 339 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177,316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 339 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,250 views187 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰126😁4114🤣51

Signed Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ

23 Sept 2026, 11:36 UTC≈5,080 views309 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣280🥰1712

Signed Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ

22 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC≈9,180 views521 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣402😁52🔥3124👍6🤪4👎2

22 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈11,200 views499 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🤨 Гриша зачем-то заспойлерил следующий матч «Реала».

😁375🤣8921👍5🤬5👎2👏1🥰1

21 Sept 2026, 18:29 UTC≈12,700 views516 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Вован сегодня в первый раз сидел за режиссерским пультом и записывал в формате прямого эфира новый «ХИТ». Лёша отошел в сторону и не мешал)

432🔥42😁24🏆10👍6❤‍🔥2

Signed Почти не про футбол | Александр Журавлев

21 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTC≈13,300 views574 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🔟 Вместо того, чтобы сравнивать каких-то там Крооса и Зидана, лучше зацените отсылку Никиты на лауаш. В следующем выпуске ждем косплей на курагу. 3️⃣ ТРЕТИЙ ЛИШНИЙ

😁48647🤣33👍6👎2

21 Sept 2026, 07:17 UTC≈12,200 views81 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @futizdatdv

Posted without readable text

55👍9👎9🔥5😴2👌1

20 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈14,000 views888 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Если бы Атлетико отдал бы Альвареса Барсе, то Барса бы не получила такого шикарного Рафинью… И хоть бы один фан каталонцев поблагодарил, а.

593🤣235😁36👍7👎6🔥5🤨3🥴3

Signed topolina

20 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC≈14,200 views773 reactionsread 23 September 2026

А вот если бы «ПСЖ» не купил Феррана, «Барса» бы не получила такого шикарного Рафинью… И хоть бы один фан каталонцев поблагодарил, а.

😁62878🤣37🔥11👎8😍4👍3💯2

Signed Капитан Финт l О футболе и всем, что его окружает | ЛЧ, АПЛ, Ла Лига, Серия А, Лига 1, Бундеслига, РПЛ

20 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC≈14,400 views574 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Если попытаться найти что-то позитивное в этой игре для Реала, то это 2 момента. 1. Навал в конце с навесами работает. Который раз уже за сезон, даже в меньшинстве. 2. Моуриньо имеет авторитет, чтобы менять кого угодно в любой момент матча. И все еще чувствует тайминг замен. Я боялся, что он постарел. Но нет. Игру заменами менять может. Жаль самой поставленной игры пока нет.

345🤣180👍23😁10❤‍🔥6👎5🤔3🍌1

Signed Почти не про футбол | Александр Журавлев

20 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈14,200 views763 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Реал - осасуна, признаём

😁555🤣151👎2113❤‍🔥12🤬5👍2🗿2

Signed Он Эйр | Роман Нагучев

20 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈14,000 views453 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Что я вам про Дэвида в старте говорила?)) А вы смеялись надо мной, что Реал не Осасуна))

🔥33648😁32👎25💯5❤‍🔥3🥴3🍌1

Signed topolina

Showing the 12 most recent of 339 posts we hold for @myachfamily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@myachfamily edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 September 2026
Most recent edit
11 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTCAnonymous Poll5,840 voters approx.

Чего вам не хватает в контенте МЯЧ Family?

  1. Мемов и приколов43%
  2. Футбольной аналитики26%
  3. Постов от ведущих на футбольные темы26%
  4. Постов от ведущих на нефутбольные темы29%
  5. Рубрик, раскрывающих ребят34%
  6. live-контента со студии41%
  7. Чего-то другого (напишу в комментах)4%
  8. Всего хватает, вы красавчики!21%

The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTCAnonymous Poll5,770 voters approx.

Важный вопрос. Вы едите арбуз с косточками?

  1. Да, с косточками48%
  2. Нет, без них52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 339 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МЯЧ Family” (@myachfamily), 36,907 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myachfamily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.