Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 11 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 126 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 11 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @pro_crypto. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 11 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -136,079. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 772,827–949,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 19:26
793,239
-2,270
9 Nov 2026, 04:10
795,509
-2,263
8 Nov 2026, 00:01
797,772
-2,110
6 Nov 2026, 20:00
799,882
-2,304
5 Nov 2026, 21:25
802,186
-1,380
4 Nov 2026, 22:01
803,566
-1,652
3 Nov 2026, 20:17
805,218
-1,484
2 Nov 2026, 21:44
806,702
-1,572
1 Nov 2026, 23:39
808,274
-2,235
31 Oct 2026, 21:56
810,509
-1,775
30 Oct 2026, 23:06
812,284
-2,702
29 Oct 2026, 22:30
814,986
-1,797
28 Oct 2026, 23:47
816,783
-1,853
27 Oct 2026, 19:37
818,636
-1,780
26 Oct 2026, 19:09
820,416
-1,358
25 Oct 2026, 21:56
821,774
-1,325
24 Oct 2026, 18:37
823,099
-2,036
23 Oct 2026, 17:10
825,135
-2,451
22 Oct 2026, 19:28
827,586
-2,692
21 Oct 2026, 15:15
830,278
first reading
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.46%
avg views ÷ 793,239 subscribers
Avg views / post
27,500
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.241%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
133 (15 June 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
521,650
Reactions total
1,259
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 02:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,650
Videos
≈710
Links
≈3,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 45m
Average length
4m 03s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,436 reactions across 133 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,735
44.3%
❤
2,891
34.3%
😎
1,407
16.7%
👍
403
4.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 133 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @team_krm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 133 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.752%
1 of 133 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
29,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
30,100
over 132 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀 Вывел 248$ с RADAR
🔗 https://t.me/Radarminiapp_bot
⬇️ Сыпет без остановки, давно такого проекта не было!
💵 Вход всего от 10$
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
💎 Получить 2 GRAM за регистрацию
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипто карта без KYC
💜 OLOID x AI - доход 0…
👀 За ночь накапало чуть больше 200$
🔗 https://t.me/Radarminiapp_bot
И это я еще забыл авто реинвест поставить, и пропустил много платежей из-за этого.
💱 Ну ничего страшного, уже включил, чтоб не пропускать.
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
💎 Получить 2 GRAM за регистрацию
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистраци…
📲 Быстрые х5+ за день!
🔗 https://t.me/Radarminiapp_bot
Кароче у проекта большой ажиотаж, более 3.000+ пререгистраций!
Какой у меня план:
- захожу в апку
- жду в офф канале анонс времени старта проекта ( сегодня )
- закину ~500$ за депозит ( он будет открыт до старта )
- и попробую первым выкупить пакеты ( по очереди покупаются )
Если я смогу первым залететь то все люди после меня закроют мне пакеты и я словлю бол…
💵Вывел 14 Gram с Cocoon Drive
👉 https://t.me/CocoonDriveBot
💥 За регистрацию дают карту ша 2 gram
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
🐸 Подарки от Secret Pixel
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипто карта без KYC
💜 OLOID x AI - доход 0.9% - 1.5% в день на Форекс рынке!
🎞…
💵Вывел 160 Gram (200$) с Cocoon Drive
👉 https://t.me/CocoonDriveBot
💥 За регистрацию дают карту ша 2 gram
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
🐸 Подарки от Secret Pixel
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипто карта без KYC
💜 OLOID x AI - доход 0.9% - 1.5% в день на Форекс р…
📡 Матрица с AI-агентами, куда пристроить ликву для х10?
🔗 https://t.me/Radarminiapp_bot
‼️Регистрации ограничены: 3 человека в час!
По этому сохраните ссылку и пробуйте позже, если сейчас не доступно!
Такие мощные запуски случаются буквально раз в год, и пропускать их — огромная ошибка. Также подключается зарубеж и Китай, ликвидность колоссальная.
Коротко о том, почему этот проект порвет рынок:
— 🤖 Умные ИИ-агент…
🕯 Вывел 1017$ с OLOID x Ai
🔗 Регистрация в проекте
💜 Доход от 0.9% до 1.5% в День!
📊Торговля на Форекс рынке на полном Автомате, с помощью искусственного интеллекта.
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
💎 Получить 2 GRAM за регистрацию
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипт…
💚 Новая карта в Cocoon Drive — всего за 5 GRAM!
👉 https://t.me/CocoonDriveBot
Начать добычу стало доступнее 🚀
🖥 Стоимость — 5 GRAM
💎 Доходность — 0,5% в сутки
⚡ Базовый доход — 0,025 GRAM ежедневно
🗓 Срок работы — 6 месяцев
Бонусы NFT увеличивают доход от карты 🔥
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
💎 Получить 2 GRAM за регистрацию
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
…
🕯 Вывел 1058$ с OLOID x Ai
🔗 Регистрация в проекте
💜 Доход от 0.9% до 1.5% в День!
📊Торговля на Форекс рынке на полном Автомате, с помощью искусственного интеллекта.
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипто карта без KYC
💜 OLOID x AI - д…
💵Вывел 75 Gram (100$) с Cocoon Drive
👉 https://t.me/CocoonDriveBot
💥 За регистрацию дают карту ша 2 gram
#CocoonDrive
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
🐸 Подарки от Secret Pixel
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
💰 Регистрация на BINGX
👤 Регистрация на WEEX
💳 Получить крипто карту
💳 Крипто карта без KYC
💜 OLOID x AI - доход 0.9% - 1.5% в ден…
💬 Делись Cocoon Drive в чатах и получай 0.001 GRAM за каждый новый чат!
📍 Открой «Рефералы» → «Делись и получай GRAM» → «Поделиться»
🚀 После отправки нажми «Подтвердить публикацию» под постом✅
💬 До 100 чатов в день. Один чат — одна награда в сутки.
⬇️🙂😉😘😘🥳🔥😘😘✊🤗
🐸 Подарки от Secret Pixel
🗿 Бесплатная рулетка Gorilla
🐸 Заработок звезд во FrogCase
⛰ Регистрация на MEXC 🔝
💳 Крипто карта MEXC
🌐 Регистрация на BYBIT
…
🔥28❤19😎9👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @team_krm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @team_krm as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PAS Community @Pas_Community · 144,994 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
🤑 CryptoTrade | SIGNALS @cryptotrade_me · 26,465 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 September 2026
Tony Bounty Invest. Пассивный доход из любой точки мира 🌍 @tonybountyinvest · 19,195 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 September 2026
Soon Trade 📈 @Soon_Trade · 25,804 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
EARTH TON @earthtonofficial · 20,645 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
Криптокрип Сайлер @mrsyler · 55,468 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
iBeHappy | Digital & VPN @iBeHappyVPN · 18,950 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 September 2026
Bergerz @Bergerz1 · 63,854 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 September 2026
🔐CRYPTO PRIVATE @crypto_privateVIP · 26,512 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
Арбузер @arbuzvcryptee · 22,000 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
Kharitonov Crypto @tu_crypto_ideas · 21,645 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Combo Tap | Комбо, Шифр, Загадка, Ребус, Код @combo_tap · 30,711 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
🐋ЭсTONец на TONе @estonec_na_tone · 32,259 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
village"ton @villageton · 20,323 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
Crypto Expert📈 @cryptoinsidstrade · 25,366 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 September 2026
NotYet Crypto @notyetcrypto · 18,689 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 September 2026
Влад | КриптоСамец @cryptosamec · 18,100 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
Crypto Pump Calls 🚀 @Crypto_Dex_Calls_Signals · 25,514 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
Raw & Chill @Raw_Chill · 65,170 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
МЕТОД ТРЕЙДЕРА @Tradmethod · 85,171 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
Псевдо Аналитик @psedvo · 24,392 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 September 2026
CRYPTOLUCID @crypto_lucid · 30,660 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
MONEY HOUSE TEAM @dominvestornews · 25,913 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
OG TON @OG_TON · 63,557 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
9 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лёха в Short’ах Long’ует” (@team_krm), 793,239 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/team_krm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.