9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,799–48,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:35
48,805
-7
11 Aug 2026, 16:36
48,812
-16
10 Aug 2026, 16:22
48,828
-11
9 Aug 2026, 18:41
48,839
-3
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
48,842
+5
7 Aug 2026, 18:24
48,837
+10
6 Aug 2026, 17:01
48,827
-3
6 Aug 2026, 01:46
48,830
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:06
48,830
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 48,805 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,740
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
54 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
418,020
Reactions total
4,723
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,000
Videos
≈3,060
Links
≈14,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 06s
Average length
1m 23s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,769 reactions across 40 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
708
18.8%
🤣
692
18.4%
😐
447
11.9%
😁
316
8.38%
❤🔥
291
7.72%
🗿
272
7.22%
👍
158
4.19%
😢
146
3.87%
😱
144
3.82%
💅
143
3.79%
😭
59
1.57%
💔
45
1.19%
👏
35
0.929%
🔥
33
0.876%
🌚
30
0.796%
🤯
28
0.743%
🤷♂
28
0.743%
😡
25
0.663%
🤷♀
17
0.451%
🎄
16
0.425%
27 further kinds
136
3.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 54 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @superslowflow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Yung Lean “Robotboy”
Внезапный новый сингл
Yung Lean выпустил новую версию песни Robyn “Robotboy”. Трек стал переосмыслением трека шведской певицы, вышедшего в 2005 году. Идея такого кавера пренадлежит самой Robyn, которая хотела услышать, как Yung Lean передаст ее меланхоличное настроение.
Ранее Yung Lean и Robyn вместе работали над ремиксом “360” Charli XCX. Оба артиста выросли в стокгольмском районе Седермальм.…
Жена Wormganger выбросила дочку из окна
Анну Образцову отправили в СИЗО
Анна Образцова, жена рэпера Wormganger, столкнула с балкона 10 этажа их общую трехлетнюю дочь. Сообщается, что женщина была в нетрезвом состоянии. Также у нее участились нервные срывы после того, как сам Wormganger сел в тюрьму. Сейчас дочь находится в тяжелом состоянии.
Суд арестовал Анну на два месяца, до 10 октября. За покушение на убийство…
Pitchfork поставил 0/10 альбому Tyga “$tarface”
Все из-за ИИ
На сайте Pitchfork появилась рецензия на альбом Tyga “$tarface”, который тот выпустил на одноименном сайд-проекте. Альбом получил оценку 0 из-за того, что сделан при помощи нейросетей.
Сначала Tyga утверждал, что альбом полностью сделан людьми и записан с использованием винтажного оборудования, но позже признал, что использовал ИИ как инструмент.
Автор …
"Этот нигер — гей": A$AP Rocky об ориентации Tyler, the Creator
Рофл или реально?
A$AP Rocky ответил на вопрос, действительно ли Tyler, the Creator гей или просто троллит. Тема возникла во время недавнего появления A$AP Rocky на The Jason Lee Show.
“Этот ниггер гей”, — заявил Rocky. Затем добавил: “Я никогда не видел, чтобы этот ниггер делал что-то гейское. Но он весь день играет в гея”.
После этого разговор пере…
Aqyla, Voskresenskii “Акраповичъ”
“Я хочу себе Гелик, как физрук”
Voskresenskii и Aqyla выпустили фит “Акраповичъ”. Вы можете помнить это дуо по треку “Да хун пао”. Продакшн на “Акраповичъ” — тоже Aqyla. Несмотря на строчки в припеве: “Akrapovič, у меня всё окей, этот опп — он гей”, Воскресенский на куплете признается, что он добряк и желает “Уюта в каждый дом и котлету в каждый карман”.
Сразу два трека с упоминан…
Жена Pharaoh высказалась о творчестве мужа
“Сука — это многогранник” 2.0
Соня Егорова, участница шоу “Битва экстрасенсов” и жена Pharaoh, выложила ролик, где отвечает на вопрос: “Соня, мне кажется, ваш муж поет только про сук и про какую-то хуйню. Почему вы считаете, что он талантлив?”.
“Очень сложно вам попытаться что-то даже объяснить и тем более доказать, если вы воспринимаете творчество настолько прямолинейно.…
Инстасамка не уезжает из России
Развела аудиторию ради промо релиза
Инстасамка призналась, что выдумала историю с переездом из России ради хайпа. В пятницу у артистки выйдет трек “Лишь раз”, и она решила вбросить фейковый инфоповод, чтобы о нем написали медиа.
“Ну что ж, друзья, не думала я, не гадала, что мы с вами так жестко хайпанем. В пятницу я планировала дропнуть очень экспериментальный и необычный для меня …
Слава КПСС “Кто виноват? (Larl Diss)”
Слава КПСС появился в клипе “Кто виноват? (Larl Diss)”. Это рекламный клип букмекерской конторы и киберспортивной команды Team Spirit.
Жанр — шуточный дисс на киберспортсмена по Dota 2 Дениса Larl Сигитова. Слава КПСС предстает в образе скуфа, который следит за игровым процессом, выпивая пиво и сидя на унитазе. В треке он обвиняет игрока как во всех неудачах команды, так и в ве…
Gataski “Химия”
“Стрессы, болезни, пишу песни, побыл милым — хер с ним”: так страдают от любви рэперы
У Gataski вышел альбом “Химия” — 13 треков о разрушительных отношениях: бесполезных попытках исправить человека рядом и надежде на то, что в этот раз все будет по-другому, которой не суждено сбыться.
На фитах появляются Taketake и Deathoria. У первого сейчас вирусится трек “Baby my type” в тиктоке и чартах стримин…
Spotify начнет маркировать ИИ-артистов
Spotify объявил, что с середины сентября начнет маркировать ИИ-исполнителей пометкой AI Persona (ИИ-персона).
Пометка позволит слушателям понять, что “личность артиста может быть сгенерирована искусственным интеллектом и не имеет отношения к реальному человеку”, говорится в блоге сервиса.
Начиная с сегодняшнего дня создатели ИИ-артистов также могут самостоятельно указывать эт…
Баста, Гуф “Никто не верил в нас”
Баста и Гуф выпустили клип “Никто не верил в нас”. Он начинается с отрывка старого интервью рэперов накануне выхода альбома “Баста / Гуф” в 2010 году, а затем продолжается нарезкой архивных кадров их совместных выступлений. В том числе в кадре появляются Айза с еще маленьким Сэмом, а также Ориджинал Ба Тамара Константиновна.
Трек “Никто не верил в нас” вошел во вторую часть альбома…
Lildrughill “Dreams”
Lildrughill выпустил клип “Dreams”. Трек вошел в его недавний альбом “Mike”. В песне используется тот же семпл, что и в хите Kizaru “Nikto Ne Nuzhen” 2015 года. Клип Lildrughill снят на пляже — в клипе Kizaru тоже есть кадры на побережье.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaQsxisVNAE
😁7❤4❤🔥4😐3🗿1🤷♀1😨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @superslowflow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,564 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Oxxxymiron @norimyxxxo · 155,528 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Anacondaz(ru.wikipedia.org) “…«Мама, я люблю» с альбома «[[Байки инсайдера]]».{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/superslowflow/27449?single|title=The Flow|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-11-22}}…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Flow” (@superslowflow), 48,805 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superslowflow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.