Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Daily Slime

@dailyslime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,842subscribers

+1,715 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001582524053
TypeChannel
Username@dailyslime
Descriptionне газета @DailySlimeBiz - for all questions мой спотик - https://open.spotify.com/user/3sz1h1bkbrdjspv8btccqqep3?si=tNy92JoISvqKYV6WjuQduQ&utm_source=copy-link
Created10 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dailyslime

Growth

36,12737,84236,984.56 August 2026 — 36,127 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,294 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,390 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,551 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,599 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,666 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,842 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,715. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,870–38,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:0537,842+176
11 Aug 2026, 16:2437,666+67
10 Aug 2026, 16:5437,599+48
9 Aug 2026, 19:0237,551+161
8 Aug 2026, 18:0637,390+96
7 Aug 2026, 20:0737,294+250
6 Aug 2026, 20:1037,044+917
6 Aug 2026, 02:3436,127first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 37,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held57 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total695,550
Reactions total22,157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,950
Videos
1,740
Links
574

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,493 reactions across 45 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,33856.6%
custom 54336964677242875801,68310.2%
❤‍🔥1,3157.97%
🕊1,2517.59%
💯1,0196.18%
🔥8565.19%
💔3622.19%
🆒3562.16%
💘1470.891%
💋1340.812%
🍾320.194%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
368
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 57 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
333
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dailyslime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC≈3,040 views209 reactions333 Starsread 12 August 2026

раз в месяц надо просто врубить влр и все чил

136🕊32🔥23💯10🍾4custom 54336964677242875803💘1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

12 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈6,000 views349 reactionsread 12 August 2026

сегодня в 18:33 пропадает гравитация. просьба всем оппам выйти на улицу.

❤‍🔥22970💋33custom 54336964677242875808💘4🕊3🔥2

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

12 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈7,360 views166 reactionsread 12 August 2026

секретные гости кое-кто + кое-кто

108🔥24🕊18💔6🆒3💋2💯2custom 54336964677242875802

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

11 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC≈9,280 views230 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

выбираем лучший соус в макдональдсе в комментах

💯145custom 543369646772428758046🕊239💋3💘2🆒2

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

11 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈10,300 views153 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

вот уже практически два года как я в москве и параллельно со всей музыкальной и не только деятельностью я еще и очень люблю свою работу на лейбле коала мьюзик. у нас прекрасная команда, мы сотрудничаем с лучшими артистами великого 2026, которых вы все прекрасно знаете, и продолжаем оставаться самым чил и при этом очень крупным лейблом в нашей талантливой стране. 13 июля стартовал прием заявок на третью ежегодную Ак

🕊7139💔23🍾7custom 54336964677242875806🆒3💋2❤‍🔥1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

11 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈11,500 views618 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

мама ща сказала что у кардина бранные слова она не хочет слушать но говорит вот я взрослая женщина но ШАЛАВА ТРЯСЕТ П@**% заело в голове

421🔥99custom 543369646772428758077💯12💔3🕊3💘2🆒1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

11 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈10,900 views555 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

иногда не понимаю почему с людьми во взрослой жизни нельзя разговаривать как в голосовом чате в кс в 7 классе

385🆒80🕊61custom 543369646772428758016💔4💘3❤‍🔥2💯2

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

10 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC≈10,600 views486 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ntahompagazeeeeeeeeePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥253143custom 543369646772428758070🔥12💘6💔1🆒1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

10 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC≈12,600 views615 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

в россии достаточно быть не долбоебом и ты уже чил

410💯115❤‍🔥71custom 54336964677242875806💋5💔4💘4

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

10 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈12,500 views462 reactionsread 12 August 2026

)

🕊306💔8562💘4💯2custom 54336964677242875802🆒1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

10 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈14,000 views355 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DAILY SLIME X ВИЛЬЧИНСКИЙ: «Давно не виделись» 15 АВГУСТА ДК КРИСТАЛЛ УЛИЦА билеты регистрация

244custom 543369646772428758060💯42🔥4💘3💋1🆒1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

10 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈13,300 views841 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

мой любимый сок! пью только его! яблоко топ

custom 5433696467724287580481194🕊119💯17🔥15💘8🆒6💔1

Signed dr.korner ◢ ◤

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @dailyslime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 978 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

āрсéнbq
@arsenbbq · 214
2 posts
cardinparis
@cardinparis · 14,547
2 posts
elegravezde
@mdctg · 1,034
2 posts
pk
@meinmynature · 76
2 posts
MOROSE
@MoroseFN · 127
2 posts
nastya's safe space
@sossgirlworld · 76
2 posts
dj Alive
@alivecrazzyy · 78
1 post
кружки аутиста
@AuCircles · 93
1 post
AV
@avbestproduction · 96
1 post
AVLNI
@avlnii · 51
1 post
Bakiia, why u haven't replied?
@bakiias · 318
1 post
бастард
@bazlo007 · 79
1 post
blackiphone4s
@blackiphone4s · 111
1 post
метал брейкдаун
@bleachtheskin · 95
1 post
bolt
@bolttttttttt · 71
1 post
CATSTER HUB
@catster_hub · 250
1 post
Coralean
@coraleann · 509
1 post
d1gitaldel
@d1gitaldel · 8,015
1 post
VITMAN фан страничка
@dailyslime_top · 226
1 post
dj flürr
@djflurrr · 1,622
1 post
airplxne.
@ear_worm_airplxne · 43
1 post
el’
@elyaalam · 122
1 post
peculiar
@ethereal555 · 527
1 post
finessplug
@finessplugg · 187
1 post
холерик
@holeric02 · 43
1 post
HOTBOX UNIVERSE
@hotboxclub · 2,235
1 post
platinov
@inetstars · 1,765
1 post
JENNY JIN
@JENNY420JIN · 22
1 post
ДЖОЗИДРОП
@josydropp1 · 92
1 post
kellygine
@kellygine · 152
1 post
kira percocet
@kira_percocet · 804
1 post
karpenko btw
@kkarpenkkoo · 562
1 post
🤬meinklopfklopf
@klopfklopfm · 414
1 post
👁💋лантана
@lantanaswaggin · 214
1 post
лерок
@leeeeeerockkkk · 8,909
1 post
очень голые женщины
@lelelelesiskipiski · 1,261
1 post
anokhina_elizabeth_2007
@lizzynashka · 20,877
1 post
LUVVEX
@luvvex · 251
1 post
Мак$им
@mausitty · 122
1 post
мамэтотолькодляфото
@mijfp · 2,728
1 post
миввака
@mivvakarfilmingrn · 101
1 post
music of kaych 🎶💙
@musicofkaych · 94
1 post
#k1
@MWbeatsF · 23
1 post
n̤͉͚̬̫͛͆́͑̏i²⁴lab
@ni24lab · 2,314
1 post
nikirew
@nikirew · 318
1 post
nikki lover
@nikkilov3r · 112
1 post
nneuby
@nneubyplugg · 340
1 post
bloodsommelier
@notesformywho · 40
1 post
NIKITA VISHNEVSKY®
@nshironeprod · 70
1 post
outst
@outstt · 18
1 post
pivAlina
@pivalinaaaa · 129
1 post
помело
@polwemh · 211
1 post
iceyr0$emane
@r0semane · 66
1 post
right nau
@rightnau · 479
1 post
sawoiia
@sawoiia · 225
1 post
щавелий///
@shaveliy1123 · 126
1 post
SMOOTH CLUB
@smoothclub · 1,325
1 post
SONYLARPP
@sonylarpp · 350
1 post
Sunshine Routine
@sunshineddj · 557
1 post
архив темных двадцатых
@td20core · 7,912
1 post
St. triumph monastery
@triumphmonastery · 1,548
1 post
<twentyysixth!!3
@twentyysixt · 46
1 post
wakey alroy
@wakey_alroy · 29
1 post
wheaxx
@wheaxx · 64
1 post
XILV
@XILVVV · 197
1 post
XTREME
@xtremextreme · 12,782
1 post
Justplugg <3
@youweek · 169
1 post
BOLSHOIMALCHIK
@zanosi_kapusty · 48
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 49 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 252,386
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daily Slime” (@dailyslime), 37,842 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailyslime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.