Channel
@dkdanceblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,043subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001982050208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dkdanceblog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dkdanceblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 3,043 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 3,047 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 3,070 | -39 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 3,109 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 3,109 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,653 |
| Reactions total | 358 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
292 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5407058861511184587 | 143 | 49.0% | |
| custom 5406589623449196414 | 73 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5409007286309914787 | 52 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5406719876922380606 | 16 | 5.48% | |
| custom 5407094853337126740 | 8 | 2.74% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dkdanceblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqx9WBPQ | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В России вырезали Монеточку из нового «Человека-паука». Её заменили на Рианну До полноценного проката фильма в России ещё две недели. Но на всяких рутюбах уже появились пиратские перезаливы — и там нет «Монополии», зато звучит хитяра Рианны. По-моему, пираты попутали берега и зря отказались (раньше прокатчиков) от звонкой Монеточки.
custom 540658962344919641435custom 54070948533371267408
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 540658962344919641415custom 54067198769223806068
Зашёл на «Колобка», а тут...
Вечеринка в ДК ДАНС — подборка #22 Наконец готов показать вам новую подборку отличных песен из предложки. Музыканты, спасибо, что делитесь! огонёк — Собачий кайф Альтернатива с рэгги, психоделикой и этникой. С каждым припевом прилипает всё сильнее. аквапарк — усталые люди Современный извод рок-н-ролла. Задорно, симпатично и заразительно. Vlad Maru — So Fine Мягкий инди-поп: в этом треке приятно побыть, будто все …
custom 540705886151118458726custom 54090072863099147876
Я скучаю по временам, когда все медиа пилили тесты: кажется, в каждой редакции был отдельный человек, помешанный на них. Когда-то (в хабаровском медиа HLEB) таким парнем был я. Но самые угарные тесты выпускали авторы легендарного издания W-O-S.ру — к большому счастью, их жемчужины до сих пор можно найти. Вчера мне подкинули залипательный тест на музыкальную субличность. Грубо говоря, какая роль в музыке тебе подходи…
custom 540705886151118458715custom 54090072863099147878
1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ лучших песен 2026-го С начала года я параллельно веду два плейлиста (на ЯМ и Спотике), куда закидываю самые любимые песни. Не те, что просто зацепили, а те, к которым я сам тянусь и возвращаюсь. И там набралась уже сотня! Спешу поделиться: — 100 лучших зарубежных песен (Spotify) — 110 лучших песен на русском (Яндекс Музыка) Отдельно скажу про июль. Вышел фирмовый альбом Стива Лейси, захватывающий днб-ал…
custom 540705886151118458724custom 54090072863099147877
Где музыка? Моё большое ворчание Сейчас выходит больше качественной музыки, чем когда-либо в истории. Не потому что все резко стали талантливыми. А просто потому что никогда ещё написание песен не было настолько доступным делом, и чисто статистически мы получаем больше хорошего материала. Беда в другом — в переизбытке, в том, где теперь и как искать классные релизы. Слушатели и артисты тянут друг к другу руки, но д…
custom 540705886151118458758custom 540900728630991478723
В России начали продавать сборники нейротреков на виниле Это не прикол: автор той самой «Гармоники» запустил в продажу пластинки со своими ИИ-песнями. Теперь послушать SunoЕсенина можно за 4-5 тысяч рублей на проигрывателе. Сохраним голоса роботов для потомков!
custom 540658962344919641423custom 54067198769223806068
Если бы инди-музыканты были посудой (часть третья) Снова взялся за игру в подбор посуды к музыкантам по их вайбу. Прям интересно включать дискографию артиста и искать ему ассоциативно предмет. Если что, первая часть тут, вторая здесь. Мальбэк и Сюзанна — это ступка с пестиком; именно вместе у них получается всё самое вкусное polnalyubvi — это средневековый темно-красный кубок, мрачный, почти вампирский RSAC — это…
custom 540705886151118458720custom 54090072863099147878
В России разгорается toly summer С нашего прошлого разговора новая звезда поколения альфа окончательно перестала быть тикток-форсом на неделю. Вот — у Толи Саммера уже полмиллиона слушателей на Яндексе. Вот — он выступает на Дне молодёжи в Москве и готовится дать сольник в Питере. Вот — разносит сцену на концерте у рэпера tuborosho, где толпа раздаёт слэм под «ЗА ЛЕСАМИ, ЗА ГОРАМИ». Траектория успеха Анатолия может…
В последний месяц лета мы планируем закрывать все свои летние гештальты, наслаждаться теплыми вечерами, доедать оставшуюся черешню и много танцевать. Вместе с Никитой Зинченко — журналистом и автором «ДК ДАНС» — по традиции делимся с вами российскими музыкальными новинками июля, которые нас приятно удивили.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dkdanceblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 19,473 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДК ДАНС 🎸” (@dkdanceblog), 3,043 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dkdanceblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.