Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Слезы Криптана

@slezi_cryptana

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002031023644
TypeChannel
Username@slezi_cryptana
DescriptionСобираем и публикуем интересные факты и случайные совпадения (Шарий, Одиссей, Grimace, Sundae, Sex)
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 8 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/slezi_cryptana

Growth

267 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:1926no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:5126first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 8 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Videos
14
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2261.1%
👍513.9%
411.1%
🤣38.33%
🤬25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 18 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 May 2024, 17:55 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/LegionXFinance/8 Группа Слёзы Криптана больше не актуальна, никаких публикаций в ней не будет

👍1

23 Feb 2024, 19:13 UTC311 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я наверное ошибся в своих расчётах, это начнётся раньше

😁4

23 Feb 2024, 19:10 UTC263 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Хм, крутейшая схема от суперкриптана, купить эфир на 29к долларов что бы заработать 120 долларов?)))

😁6

23 Feb 2024, 19:06 UTC193 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

АА реально начал винить своих подписчиков в том что они продают его токен??😄

😁5

22 Feb 2024, 17:37 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Как вы считаете, стоит продолжать разборы всяких ЛОМов нечистых на руку или начинать заниматься собственным (независимым) анализом проектов, публиковать всякие обучающие посты и курсы в бесплатном доступе? Либо делать все сразу)

  1. Разборы нечистых39%
  2. Свои проекты13%
  3. Все сразу48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

22 Feb 2024, 17:34 UTC159 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Моё личное скромное мнение - несколько месяцев АА подержит своих людей на обещаниях по ГТА(зеленые огурцы, ваши нищенские лимитки, команда корабля не значит ничего и т.п.), а далее будет то, что и было в предыдущем проекте который он шилил - найдутся виновные!))

👍1

22 Feb 2024, 17:27 UTC131 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @skamshotPhoto

Не обвал, а затишье. Лёгкий штиль. 💱обменять крипту в Bitpapa

😁4

22 Feb 2024, 17:27 UTC139 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Скоро ждём деанон фаундеров GTA?))

🤣3

22 Jan 2024, 20:30 UTC314 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Но такие комментарии на криптоканале шария всячески одобряются и поддерживаются комьюнити)) интересный ход😂 Человек в постах выше, точно так же написал в комментариях глупость и уже пошли угрозы от товарища, как говориться - в чужом глазу... ну вы поняли))

🤬2

22 Jan 2024, 20:26 UTC236 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Тут мы видим ретранслятор криптоканала Анатолия шария (подпольная кличка - Товарищ) как мы быстро подтираем сообщения после определенного поста на канале Одиссея(пост ниже будет)

14 Jan 2024, 19:04 UTC253 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @skamshotPhoto

Да. Действительно. В Д/У Шарий брал ГРИМАС. Вероятно, всем денежки из Д/У вернул.

😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @slezi_cryptana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Feb 2024, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Как вы считаете, стоит продолжать разборы всяких ЛОМов нечистых на руку или начинать заниматься собственным (независимым) анализом проектов, публиковать всякие обучающие посты и курсы в бесплатном доступе? Либо делать все сразу)

  1. Разборы нечистых39%
  2. Свои проекты13%
  3. Все сразу48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 18 May 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слезы Криптана” (@slezi_cryptana), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slezi_cryptana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.